/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.6142242]

Why is there a term like "Absolute Zero" if it's impossible?

[Anonymous No.6142246]

Because it's a limit.

[Anonymous No.6142249]

to distinguish from ice

[Anonymous No.6142254]

Every nigga has his limit.

[Anonymous No.6142260]

>>6142242
Same reason you can refer to "losing your virginity", despite the fact that it will never happen to you. Just because something is impossible doesn't mean it's not a useful concept to refer to - it's a limit that you can get arbitrarily close to, but never achieve.

[Anonymous No.6142324]

>>6142242
Absolute zero = Absolutely no kinetic energy.

It's far from impossible, it's extremely conceivable.
It's just vastly difficult to apply, or engineer.

I've done a lot of theocratic reasoning with absolute zero, as science is getting into it's next stage with quantum-limits meaning it is beginning to breakdown the rational and irrational factors with transcendental ones. I.E. Magic

If you could send impulses of shockwaves to the molecular stuctures in your hand, and control the rate of energy sharing between them, you could with impulses, become immune to temperature, and in-turn be capable of manipulating kinetic energy by willpower.

In simple terms, fireballs could be held in the palm of your hands, or completely encompass the body. It would not only not burn you, but it could keep you cool, warm you slightly, or otherwise any other form of kinetic-related feels.

This is the easiest form of magic that exists; Kinetic-related

In fact, all forms of magic will be related to kinetic energy, or the energy of movement.


>tfw MAGIC = /SCI/ not /X/

[Anonymous No.6142979]

>>6142260
shotsfired!

#REKT

[Anonymous No.6142981]

>>6142324
ACTCHUALLY temperature's defined in relation to entropy - and as a result, you can have stuff with negative absolute temperature, that is, it resists a gain in entropy, releasing any energy attempted to be put into it in other ways.

[Anonymous No.6142982]

>>6142260
#REKT
[X]TOLD
ICEBUTTNED

[Anonymous No.6142983]

Because it needs a name. What do you want to call it? "The temperature that whose name shall not be spoke"

[Anonymous No.6142992]

>>6142260
Damn.
That's-
Wow.
You got rekt OP.

[Anonymous No.6143009]

>>6142260
OP, you're gonna need something cold.

[Anonymous No.6143013]

>>6142260

[Anonymous No.6143017]

>>6142260

REKT
ARCHIVE FOR THE FUTURE GENERATIONS

[Anonymous No.6143038]

>>6142260

/thread

[Anonymous No.6143039]

>>6143017
archived for future generations.

[Anonymous No.6143040]

>>6142260
DONE.

[Anonymous No.6143046]

>>6142260
GET HIM A NOBEL

[Anonymous No.6143070]

>>6143046
lol there was one floating around /sci/

[Anonymous No.6143104]

>>6143039