[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 459 KB, 1164x3700, 1367011647126.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6092511 No.6092511 [Reply] [Original]

Did anyone ever finish this?

>> No.6092512
File: 256 KB, 1164x3700, sci trench.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6092512

>> No.6092528

>>6092512
The descriptions in yellow are pretty bad.
"It gets more abstract from here" is redundant, it goes more abstract at every point.
Computer science doesn't get more rigorous "than math".
etc.

>> No.6092541

>>6092528
What would you put?

>> No.6092544
File: 91 KB, 447x444, 1361361511390.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6092544

>L'Hospital

>> No.6092547

>>6092512
> chemestry

>> No.6092550
File: 19 KB, 371x455, Shinichi Mochizuki.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6092550

does this guy count as level 5?

>> No.6092559

Wheres graphitics?

>> No.6092567

>>6092512
>having a gf

I laughed there a bit much

>> No.6092569

>>6092511

No, because all the 1337 math 300k starting PhD's on /sci/ are actually 19 year olds who haven't taken any math more difficult than calc 3.

>> No.6092572

just to be sure, the so called "social sciences" such as sociology, antropology and derivates are only called science as a formality, they are not really science, yes?

>> No.6092584

>>6092567
IT's kind of true, being an expert in math doesn't seem to be much of a turn-on to bitches. :(

>> No.6092595

>>6092584
i though there would be some mathematician girls

>inb4, read the sticky newfag

>> No.6092606

>>6092595
Eh, you have to be in a special place to find that, and even if -- they're probably ugly.

>> No.6092612

>>6092606
>even if -- they're probably ugly.

So being an expert in math isn't much of a turn-on for you either, I guess.

>> No.6092620

I tip my fedora to whoever works on these things, looks like a lot of work.

>> No.6092621

>>6092606
>and even if -- they're probably ugly
implying you guys have much choice (no offense)

>> No.6092654
File: 12 KB, 252x650, inb4.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6092654

>>6092511
How about this?

>> No.6092658

>>6092612
It would be if the brains attributed to the physical aestetics.

>>6092621
Eh, you're probably right; but likewise for you.

>> No.6092663

>>6092654
I bet you haven't even studied fractal geometry, category theory, and chaos theory.

>> No.6092666

>>6092658
>but likewise for you.

I can't be sad or angry because you are right

>> No.6092691

Can we finish this? This actually looks pretty cool and would be interesting to see.

>> No.6092696

>>6092691
>/sci/
>doing anything
zero board culture.

>> No.6092698

>>6092691
What should go next?

>> No.6092702

>>6092698
triple integrals

>> No.6092703

>>6092698
Shitting my pants.

PEACE OUT SCI

>> No.6092707

Level 2:
Functions of matrices (A^3+A^2+A stuff)
Fourier and Lagrange transforms,
rank, analytic functions,
Cauchy Residue Theorem?, residues?

Level 3 (grad eng math):
eigenfunctions, Sturm–Liouville problems, diagonalization/decomposistion of matrices, linear transformations, self-adjoint operators (ew), variations, functionals, euler-lagrange equation,

going off this:
mmae 501/502 is grad engineering mathematics (for mech e's so not so much complex)
http://www.iit.edu/engineering/mmae/course_descriptions.shtml
and this Math 333: for ee and ce's
http://iit.edu/csl/am/programs/course_descriptions.shtml

>> No.6092709
File: 1.01 MB, 1247x1346, prerequisite math.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6092709

>> No.6092716

>>6092512
this is a joke right?
proved .999...=1 in 9th grade

>> No.6092721

>>6092716
we proved 1=2 in 9th grade.
fun stuff.

>> No.6092727

>>6092721
stop dividing by zero you newfag

>> No.6092744

>>6092727
:(
I didn't understand in 9th grade.

>> No.6092759

>>6092550
That guy counts as level omega^omega.

>> No.6092765

>>6092709
>Cryptography
>Game theory

>> No.6092791

Which is more mathematically demanding of the three: astrophysics, computer science or nuclear engineering?

I hear a lot on /sci/ about computer science being the biggie. Is it more math to do, more intricate math to do, or a mix of both when compared to the aforementioned ones?

>> No.6092795

>>6092727
agreed

>> No.6092837

Keep this thread alive for a couple more days. Im working on it.

>> No.6092842

>>6092837
it will never die.

>> No.6092849

>>6092791
Astrophysics > Nuclear Engineering > Computer Science

The course of CS is mostly IT for Dummies. The pure form of CS is EE + Software Development, Network or SysAdmin

>> No.6092852

>>6092849
> The course of CS is mostly IT for Dummies.
At what school? Our school (Illinois Tech) has a separate IT degree.
CS do the whole operating systems, graphics, data mining, ai.

>> No.6092926

>>6092512
Embarrassed to admit I LOLed at the end.

>> No.6092983

add schwarz christoffel transformations, principal value integrals, conformal mapping to level 3 kgo!

>> No.6092998

>>6092511
I'm guessing the bottom should be the Millennium Prize Problems?

>> No.6093074

>>6092512
haha ok that was actually pretty funny

>> No.6093079

>>6092544

Yeah, little known fact, that was his actual name.

>> No.6093080

>>6092998
Millenium prize problems are very useful for applied math.

>> No.6093107

>>6092709
the fuck does game theory have to do with theoretical physics?

>> No.6093180

>>6093107

it sounds ~sciencey~

i.e. the chart is bullshit

>> No.6093233

>>6092511
What's the depth supposed to represent exactly?

>> No.6093242
File: 19 KB, 242x300, 21.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6093242

>>6093107
>implying QM isn't just a game of chance
>mfw

>> No.6093263

>>6093079
Little known fact, spelling it that way is less frequent and when done so the 's' is silent.

>> No.6093285

>>6092512
>Timecube
Hehehe

>> No.6093287

>>6093233
obscurity?

>> No.6093317

>>6093233
how weird you look when you explain what you're studying to someone

>> No.6094192

>>6093263
Little uninteresting fact :
L'Hospital is the ancient way to orthography the name
(Guillaume François Antoine de L'Hôpital).
A lot of words in French have seen their "os" turned into "ô". (forest (like you) turned into forêt for instance)
That's why you should write
"de L'Hospital" (classy) or
"de L'Hôpital"

both pronounced o-pee-tal

"L'Hopital" is stricto sensu a grave offense to the French people.

>> No.6094216

>>6094192
Everything's a grave offense to the French people.

>> No.6094224

>>6094192
>"L'Hopital" is stricto sensu a grave offense to the French people.

I'm French and this is not a grave offense to me, I understand that my English is not perfect, and I understand that the French of foreign people might not be perfect. Way to spread false rumors. You may think that most French would be offended as opposed to all, but that would be still wrong, only the grammar nazis would get offended at this.

>> No.6094231

>>6094192

It's not pronounced "Lo-Pee-Tall?"
I've been lied to for years

>> No.6094276

>>6094192
>"L'Hopital" is stricto sensu a grave offense to the French people.
Then I'll continue to use it.

>> No.6094281

>>6093263

I'm the guy you replied to. I know the language.

>> No.6094347

>>6094224
France society is predicated upon being grammar nazis. You have a centuries old government body solely dedicated to preserving the "purity" of the French language. Your government passes laws regulating how many English songs can be played on the radio, and forbids the usage of English terminology in official documents.

>> No.6094413

>>6094347
I guess you know more on the subject than myself. Anyway what the government wants the people to do and what the people actually do are two different things. More and more english words are being introduced into the dictionaries. And most people here can't actually spell for shit, so much for being grammar nazis. It hurts the eyes to read some stuff (like when you write "their" instead of "they're", or "your" instead of "you're"), but no one except the ultimate grammar nazis would give a shit if you spelled hopital instead of hôpital.

>> No.6094419

>>6093242
> implying that's game theory

>> No.6094416

>>6094413
Forgot to add, the laws passed to regulate how many english songs are played on the radio are not to preserve the "purity" of the french language but rather to force the radio stations to promote french artists. But then I and many others don't listen to the radio so we are not affected by that in any way either.

>> No.6094423

Apparently, before infants can even count much, they can draw one to one relationships between sets of small magnitude. So OP's pic needs revision right at the top.

>> No.6094778
File: 301 KB, 1100x3300, Trench.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6094778

70% Complete. Thanks for keeping the thread alive for this long. If you have any questions or suggestions please reply back. I will try to complete it when I find the time.

>> No.6094788

>>6094419
von Neumann, developer of the 'solution' to a two-person zero sum game, applied the same technique to describe the 'collapse' of a wavefunction -- the two are mathematically equivalent.

Compare his books "Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics" with "Theory of Games and Economic Behavior".

>> No.6095297
File: 1.76 MB, 1164x3700, myettdyamon.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6095297

>> No.6096095

>>6094192
>"L'Hopital" is stricto sensu a grave offense to the French people.
>>6094224, dude, I was playing on purpose the grammar nazi...
Of course nobody gives a shit...
Unless you begin to write "les gen son tousse dé kon", that's quite fine.

(how many french guys know how to use properly , "^","¨","é" or "è", ";", ...)

I was more waiting for answers like that >>6094276

>> No.6097404
File: 433 KB, 1164x3700, trench.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6097404

Yes I have