[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 83 KB, 1000x800, 1381691782528.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6087685 No.6087685 [Reply] [Original]

1) Fish absorbs water molecule
2) Fish extract oxygen it needs to live, then reject unused hydrogen
3) Plant absorbs carbon dioxide
4) Plant extract carbon it need to live, then reject unused oxygen
5) Hydrogen burn and ENERGY!
6) Combustion of hydrogen produce the two molecules of water back.

>> No.6087702

and again the wrong people got award with that nobel thing

>> No.6087708

Free power until we hit peak fish flakes

>> No.6087715

>>6087685
if only fish exhaled hydrogen...

>> No.6087716

1) Fish absorbs water molecule
no
fish run water through their gills

2) Fish extract oxygen it needs to live, then reject unused hydrogen
no
fist extract the oxygen that's dissolved in the water. taking the oxygen from H2O requires much more energy
3) Plant absorbs carbon dioxide
yes
4) Plant extract carbon it need to live, then reject unused oxygen
no...it's just much more complicated
5) Hydrogen burn and ENERGY!
yes
6) Combustion of hydrogen produce the two molecules of water back.
no
combustion of 2 hydrogen produce one molecule of water