[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 994 KB, 525x525, Universal Expansion.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6038268 No.6038268 [Reply] [Original]

Googol = 10^100
Googolplex = 10^googol
Googolplexian = 10^googolplex

All below are not real numerals. Theoretically designed by I.

Googolplexianth = 10^googolplexian
Googolplexianthic = 10^googolplexianth
Googolplexianthical = 10^googolplexianthic
Googolplexianthicalion = 10^googolplexianthical
Googolplexianthicalionae = 10^100^googol^googolplex^googolplexian^googolplexianth^googolplexianthic^googolplexianthical^googolplexianthicalion


Googolplexianthicalionae is the largest numeral in existence, official or otherwise with a baseline in reality and a solidified form.

To hear it spoken it try: https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/speakit/pgeolalilifpodheeocdmbhehgnkkbak
59% volume
150x words
UK Male

>> No.6038279
File: 144 KB, 500x452, umadbro.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6038279

Googolplexianthicalionae + 1

>> No.6038286

>>6038268
Gogopowerrangers=10^?

>> No.6038292

Mynumber = Whateveryournumberis + 1

I win.

>> No.6038294

>>6038279
>>6038292
That is not a numeral, it's a formula. Solute it then you can claim it with a name.

>>6038286
>tfw no 1 knows the difference between expansion and stationary numerals.


1...000.000...1

>> No.6038296
File: 975 KB, 500x500, Brain Waves.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6038296

>>6038279
>>6038286
>>6038292
>>6038294

By basic explanation the difference between your idea of the next stage in this falls flat because you do not understand the difference of numeration and numbers.
Numbers can be used to count, while numerals are a property, or a powerlevel.

The largest number based on what you're implying would be

9...999.999...9
infinity.infinitesimal

>> No.6038311

>>6038294
What is that number supposed to be?

>> No.6038314
File: 22 KB, 369x578, MvM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6038314

>>6038311
1...000.000...1 ?

That makes me sad as fuck for you to ask.

That is what all numbers look like in their most basic form.

So when a preschooler is learning to count 123
what they are saying is
1...001.000...1
1...002.000...1
1...003.000...1

>> No.6038316

Graham's number is larger than that isn't it

>> No.6038322

fuckin lame fail troll thread which will go nowhere ahahahahahahahaa!

>> No.6038330
File: 969 KB, 500x500, Centerior.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6038330

>>6038316
There is absolutely no chance it's bigger than even the basic forms of Googol, let alone Googolplexianthicalionae.

Even if I was to agree Graham's "number," was in fact a quantified value, it's not even a speck in relation to Googolplexianthicalionae.

Honestly, every mind of all space of all time of all spacetime in every dimension of every infinity does not have enough to hold the true form of Googolplexianthicalionae.

I mean, trying to understand that a googol is 10^100 is pretty incredible, but graspable. Trying to understand a googolplex is where it beings to lose it's sense of grasp ability.

googol = 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

a googolplex is 1 followed by a googol of zeros.
You can't even understand what that means because you don't have any clue how larger the number googol is. The only reason you can even understand googol is because of the one hundred zeros.

When you try to level your understanding to googolplex you have an unimaginable amount of zeros, because googol itself is nearly unimaginable itself.

Googolplexianthicalionae is going to be the largest number that will ever exist, unless I change it.

>> No.6038339
File: 948 KB, 500x500, Delete File)∞(.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6038339

>>6038330
googol = 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000
googolplex = 10^10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000
googolplexian = |?|

>>6038322
Then just call me the TrollGnome.

>> No.6038341
File: 4 KB, 344x326, 1279810400343.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6038341

>>6038330
>Honestly, every mind of all space of all time of all spacetime in every dimension of every infinity does not have enough to hold the true form of Googolplexianthicalionae.

What the fuck are you even talking about, get out

>> No.6038346
File: 20 KB, 98x89, saulch.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6038346

>>6038341
Alright, well if you can go ahead and finish the next level of the comment above yours that would be great.
googolplexian = |?|

I'm going to go kill people after I make some coffee.

>> No.6038347
File: 26 KB, 477x604, 1295276121023.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6038347

>>6038346
What's the fucking point, no one gives a shit

>GUYS I THOUGHT OF A REALLY BIG NUMBER LOOK HOW SMART I AM

>> No.6038365

In the unlikely event that this isn't a troll your largest numeral is extremely tiny compared to the largest named numbers.

>> No.6038399
File: 689 KB, 650x430, 5320.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6038399

>>6038347
Yeah, sometimes killing people does seem kind of pointless, they just keep coming back.
>>6038365
It is very unlikely your not a troll.
I'd say the ratio of your post not being a failed troll is a googolplexianthicalion to one septillionth. Which is a shame, because I want your post to be a fact, when it's really nothing, if that.

>> No.6038438

Do you even know how Graham's Number is defined? Dealing with these kinds of scales and then just saying "nah there is no way that is bigger than this lol" is ridiculous.
At least Graham's Number has mathematical merit, and even larger ones have been used since.

>> No.6038471
File: 981 KB, 500x375, BlackSpace.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6038471

>>6038438
Graham's Number has a lot less merit than Googolplexianthicalionae.

Graham's Number is a long towering process that doesn't even have a single line to define it. It's practically a story trying to pass itself off as a number.

While Googolplexianthicalionae can be defined entirely within a single uniform line, and then have more singular lines of which support it with even more clarity.


Even though Graham's number is larger because of it's over-convoluted standing, it really is not that large, because even if you consider it's maximum potential: 3^^^...^3 it's still a puny understanding, which is really just like trying to say the reverse of PI, subtracted by the infinity.

It's really worthless and depicts all that is wrong with esoterism within the culture of mathematical and linguistic understandings.

>> No.6038482
File: 30 KB, 398x241, girls_laughing.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6038482

FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAIIIIIIIIIIIILLL TTTTTTTTTRRRRRRRRRROOOOLL POSSSSTTTT IIIIIIIISS FAIIIIIIIIIIIIIILLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHA

>> No.6038559

I didn't read the thread but enjoyed the gifs.

>> No.6038661
File: 28 KB, 585x574, ss (2013-07-11 at 08.48.16).png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6038661

>>6038346
No one answered the question.
That's too bad. Guess I'll do everything myself, you fucking sponges.