Modern day intellectuals can't think opposite to what they were taught in school, college or university.

File: 23 KB, 640x480, 1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

aether !0hUsPtRODs Sat Sep 14 05:53:01 2013 No.6027085 [DELETED]

Modern day intellectuals can't think opposite to what they were taught in school, college or university.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 14 06:51:31 2013 No.6027126 I learn physics in my university and philosophy in my bedroom. That is how it should be done

aether !0hUsPtRODs Sat Sep 14 06:55:32 2013 No.6027132

What things are considered socially acceptable? Is it the pool of knowledge that has spread via social over many years, and that knowledge is now considered common good in society? Is it something we're used to, but if so, who is "we"? I don't understand conformity, is it a reliance on prior knowledge so we do not need new good ideas? Why is something considered incorrect to intellectuals? Is it because it doesn't make sense based on their prior knowledge? Is it not more intelligent and therefore above what's considered socially acceptable, to have knowledge of your own, and base your judgement on your own pool of knowledge? Why can we not create new pools of knowledge? What is knowledge (to modern day intellectuals)? The standard definition? Then what is conformity? You only accept certain types of knowledge? It seems to be based around the human ego; for example: moderators using their rank to appear as an upper social class; whether they deserve their gratification is a matter of opinion. There may be those who are conformed to the gratification of moderators, then it is in their opinion that moderators should be gratified, and this foundation has become socially acceptable to them. That does not mean it is "acceptable", generally, or correct for that matter. Then why are modern day intellectuals considered intellectual if their cause is based around what had become socially accepted? Einsteins theory of energy is socially accepted, but that does not mean it is correct, it just helps the others who can benefit from his theory. Therefore it is a matter of the human ego, and not intelligence. Because it is beneficent to you, does not mean it is correct for the both of us, and when the term 'conformity' is mentioned, what is 'socially acceptable', cannot be based more on self-proclaimed expert theories than it is on the common persons theory

>>	sage sage Sat Sep 14 06:58:02 2013 No.6027135 This is too much for even /x/ to handle. >>>www.timecube.com

>>	aether !0hUsPtRODs Sat Sep 14 07:13:00 2013 No.6027145 >>6027135 You're just being childish.

Anonymous Sat Sep 14 07:28:32 2013 No.6027155

I think there are those that can and those that dont, unfortunately those "who do don't talk about it" beyond saying science is open minded. The science community is always ready to condeme anything non-standard. No one wants to loose there jobs. It is only hobbiests like me or maybe even you, who are free to follow our imaginations.

I wish I could share my ability with the world, if only they'd accept it.

Anonymous Sat Sep 14 08:12:30 2013 No.6027177 [DELETED]

File: 6 KB, 200x280, Richard_Feynman_Nobel.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6027085
>>6027132
I haven't read your post in entirety but see this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYPapE-3FRw
That's the things we have lost since we have science, science ...everywhere.
Computer Science isn't a science, Soical science is full of shit ..etc.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 14 08:12:30 2013 No.6027178 >>6027132 This guy is a troll. I mean, I mean just look at his name.

Anonymous Sat Sep 14 08:50:04 2013 No.6027203

Linguistics is such an interesting science to study in college because it is still just a baby compared to physics and chemistry. In my studies so far we have actually covered two complete separate paradigms for how to look at language - one developed by the one Noam Chomsky and one by Langacker. To my knowledge they are the first two paradigms to be made.

What's really interesting is how to see parallels from the past happening currently. Chomsky's theory worked well at the beginning, but as people found more and more examples against it instead of just formulating something else he kept sort of tacking on rules - kind of like how Ptolomy kept making the nature of planets more and more bizarre.

Then Langacker comes along and writes a complete new theory based on how our brain processes language, Cognitive Grammar. This is kind of like Kepler's Laws. About 80% of linguists are still with Chomsky, but many on the west coast and my professor (and me) are on Langacker's side, or believe he is at least on to something. Chomsky is kind of stagnating at this point, but what scientist doesn't when he's in his 80's

My point is, as a linguist, we don't really have the opportunity to follow what we are taught because we still are not sure about our field and there are conflicting paradigms presented right now

>>	aether !0hUsPtRODs Sat Sep 14 08:55:32 2013 No.6027207 File: 71 KB, 352x337, 2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >no serious response >adults >intellectuals

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 14 09:26:32 2013 No.6027246 >>6027085 I have a biology manual from 2005 which said humans never crossbred with Neanderthals. Yet the same scientists which were educated under that idea proved it was wrong a few years ago. Checkmate.

>>	aether !0hUsPtRODs Sat Sep 14 11:21:30 2013 No.6027383 File: 34 KB, 640x480, 970899_155570847977067_1595317475_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6027132 bump for reply to this one

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 14 11:27:31 2013 No.6027398 >>6027132 You raise a lot of hard questions. Let me ask you this easy one : do you even know what's a paragraph is ?

>>	aether !0hUsPtRODs Sat Sep 14 12:21:30 2013 No.6027466 File: 180 KB, 500x341, tumblr_mt24qxbLvS1r9w1oso2_500.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Sat Sep 14 14:39:56 2013 No.6027639
File: 1.06 MB, 1506x958, Apotheosis.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>6027132
This. Its absolutely true.

I spent a couple of nights trying to understand a theory of the universe by some guy who works in a bar. Just because he works in a bar doesn't mean its wrong and this is obvious.

Since general relativity is flawed seriously and I don't yet understand his theory, I am still more open to his than Einstein's.

Yeah, I fucking rant and rave about the conformity problem and these fucking pseudo-intellectuals all the time but it doesn't seem to click in their brains.

You will find only VERY few intelligent people on 4chan and this board is a clusterfuck of conformity. Clear by the abundance of racism, sexism and disdain of anyone with a different thought. What I do is pretend to conform to people and think quietly to myself since I understand almost no one will agree with me.

I could go on and on and on, but you already said a lot. Good luck man and yeah, its hard having people laugh at you and believe in fallacies so adamtly.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 14 14:41:30 2013 No.6027641 >>6027639 I apologize for my poor articulation. Its just so damn tedious because I've talked about this a thousand times already.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 14 14:53:30 2013 No.6027656 >>6027132 tl;dr aether continues to be a fag. all the name fags on /sci/ seem to be completely insane shitheads.

Anonymous Sat Sep 14 14:54:00 2013 No.6027657

>>6027132
Look, I don't know if you're really being serious but things become socially acceptable because of the altruism that was built into us by evolution. Humans and other animals needed to cooperate in the wild to survive and those who refused were excluded from the pack. Therefore we become more moral by natural selection.
Your next topic was conformity. Conformity is related to the same herd mentality - desire to be accepted by the in group. You ask whether we should reject all knowledge but of course the answer is no. The aim of the scientific method is to draw conclusions that are verifiable by repeatable experiment and so it holds more weight than random ideas without proof. Science predicts outcomes, its that simple. Both relativity and religion are commonly accepted but one has a higher truth value than the other.
You can argue that I have seen little of this with my own eyes and that is true. However I have nothing that goes against my assumption that science as a whole is not a deceitful enterprise and I have seen many small confirmations of its predictions as well as large ones (like computers). Therefore the sensible thing to do is to accept it as true.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 14 15:15:01 2013 No.6027692 >>6027639 I think that if you say that general relativity is flawed, you should give us some proof of this? From what I know, it seems a pretty solid theory

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 14 15:16:31 2013 No.6027694 >>6027085 Nah OP, my uni teacher told me to question everything.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 14 15:19:02 2013 No.6027699 >>6027132 Btw Einstein considered fission a joke cover africa in grass

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 14 15:25:30 2013 No.6027708 >>6027692 >Prove something which is almost a hypothesis is false Top kek Perhaps the mathematics works and I suppose it doesn't matter how you interpret the universe, but there is no reason to believe in spacetime bending.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 14 15:25:30 2013 No.6027709 >>6027085 it's called "ideological echo chamber".

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 14 15:37:32 2013 No.6027734 >>6027708 If the mathematics works and its consistent with observation then it works. Period. Our brains were designed for survival, its foolish to expect that the universe will agree with our common sense notions.

Anonymous Sat Sep 14 15:45:31 2013 No.6027743

>>6027708

Einstein's theory of general relativity has been observed many times, though. In fact, our GPS systems would not work if we did not have the theory of relativity. We have observed light bending through space time during solar eclipses. There is a plethora of mathematics to back it up.

I think there is much more evidence for Einstein's theory than some guy in bar's theory

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 14 15:56:17 2013 No.6027764 >>6027734 >implying common sense doesn't aid survival

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 14 15:59:29 2013 No.6027769 >>6027764 no he's not. He's saying the exact opposite.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 14 16:12:30 2013 No.6027809 >>6027764 >>6027769 I'd like a second opinion on this matter please. for scientific consensus.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 14 16:16:00 2013 No.6027815 >>6027085 >Modern day intellectuals can't think opposite to what they were taught in school, college or university. Just about all the factual information that you are taught in university is correct.

>>	sage sage Sat Sep 14 16:29:00 2013 No.6027833 File: 924 KB, 420x313, test-monkey.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Can we please stop bumping this to the front page? It is obvious trolling.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 14 16:44:59 2013 No.6027871 >>6027833 do you have the news source on the study that gif is from? I remember it was funny seeing it on tv a few years ago because the chimpanzee actually beat some humans that felt humilliated about it

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 15 16:57:19 2013 No.6029782 >>6027815 How do you know it is correct? Because they told you it is correct?

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 15 16:59:50 2013 No.6029788 >>6027085 prove it.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 15 18:32:14 2013 No.6029949 Classes will dull your mind.

Anonymous Sun Sep 15 19:00:16 2013 No.6029990

I thought about what you said for a while longer OP, and I realized because people aren't trained in logical thought if we were to encourage people to think and exclude all prior knowledge from logical deductions, people would assert that Jews and black people were responsible for causing global warming.

People think with their emotions and based on evolutionary inclinations. An example of this is the fact that majority of people on this board supposedly have above average intelligence but there is prevalent misogyny and racism on here regularly. Unbiased arguments never given and this stems from the inclination we've evolved to assert innate supremacy over others. This is very visible when observing how apes behave socially.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 16 00:55:45 2013 No.6030509 >>6029949 This is true.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 16 15:40:15 2013 No.6031419 >>6029990 What makes you believe IQ would imply maturity?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 16 15:47:45 2013 No.6031434 Feels good that I'm studying math. I know the shit that I'm learning is actually true. Can't say the same thing for natural sciences.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 16 15:55:17 2013 No.6031455 >>6031419 Not once did I say IQ. Also maturity is a meaningless concept.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 16 15:56:17 2013 No.6031459 >>6031455 >Not once did I say IQ Read your own post again. >An example of this is the fact that majority of people on this board supposedly have above average intelligence

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 17 01:16:15 2013 No.6032334 >>6031434 >I know the shit that I'm learning is actually true Only under the assumptions of the axioms.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 17 18:14:40 2013 No.6033360 >>6027132 >Is it not more intelligent and therefore above what's considered socially acceptable, to have knowledge of your own, and base your judgement on your own pool of knowledge? If you do this, they'll call you insane.

>>	Anonymous Wed Sep 18 02:31:56 2013 No.6034112 >>6027085 ITT: Pseudo-intellectual thinks he's better than other pseudo-intellectuals, because he, like, has his own thoughts and stuff maaaan. Fuck the system, yo.

>>	Anonymous Wed Sep 18 16:37:48 2013 No.6035022 >>6034112 How do you distinguish between intellectualism and pseudo-intellectualism?

>>	Anonymous Wed Sep 18 16:39:18 2013 No.6035026 >>6035022 > aether !0hUsPtRODs > VSG moron not even pseudo-intellectualism > not /sci/ intellectualism

>>	Anonymous Wed Sep 18 16:42:21 2013 No.6035028 EVERY DAY UNTIL YOU'RE SICK OF IT

>>	Anonymous Wed Sep 18 23:17:46 2013 No.6035582 >>6031455 say that again? how is maturity meaningless? explain yourself

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 19 17:31:48 2013 No.6036906 >>6035026 No ad hominem attacks, please.

>>	Anonymous Fri Sep 20 12:05:50 2013 No.6038382 >>6035582 I believe that poster was joking.

Anonymous Fri Sep 20 12:33:56 2013 No.6038420

>>6035582
Maturity when regarding to behaviour usually means conformity to whatever older people are doing. There isn't an objective age to think in any way. The older you get, the more of a conformist you tend to be, etc etc. I am too tired to explain things to people on /sci/.

My point is, maturity is non-objective.

>>	Anonymous Fri Sep 20 20:38:56 2013 No.6039204 >>6027085 >Modern day intellectuals can't think opposite to what they were taught in school, college or university. That's the purpose of modern day school though..... isn't it?

Anonymous Fri Sep 20 23:21:11 2013 No.6039418

>>6038420
that is one definition of maturity
I understand maturity as real authenticity though, young people are also conformists, most of them are anarchists/feminists/communists/party sluts/ etc... as a result of peer pressure or some similar mechanism

>>	Anonymous Fri Sep 20 23:38:35 2013 No.6039438 >>6027639 >Since general relativity is flawed seriously I think I found the nigger on this thread.. Please sir go on and explain to us on how it's flawed, really this is some big shit you know.

Anonymous Fri Sep 20 23:45:04 2013 No.6039442

>>6027708
>but there is no reason to believe in spacetime bending.
Is this moron serious? Even after being proven true by pure evidence such as the testing to see if bent spacetime around an eclipse changed/blurred light passing by as demonstrating by the observation in Príncipe island in west Africa, you STILL just need to have mindless cretins in FUCKING 2013, YES FUCKING 2013 say the general theory of relativity is false.

Can you please hit your face with a brick? Kthnx,

>>	Anonymous Fri Sep 20 23:47:34 2013 No.6039444 >>6027871 The chimp didn't just beat some humans. It beats every human alive. It's performance in eidetic memory test is impossible for a Human to emulate.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 21 02:30:03 2013 No.6039612 >>6039444 I wish I was as smart as that chimp.

Anonymous Sat Sep 21 16:13:32 2013 No.6040498

>>6039442
That experiment was performed multiple times and was shown to be false by some, correct by others. It is one groups anecdote over the others.

Also what you just said is akin to saying if you see unknown phenomena or an object moving in an unconventional direction that it the universe must be manipulated or changing in some way to explain the phenomena.

Then again, THIS IS /sci/. WHY DO I EVEN BOTHER.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 21 20:42:55 2013 No.6040890 >>6039444 >is impossible for a Human to emulate. [citation needed]

Anonymous Sat Sep 21 21:16:33 2013 No.6040935

>>6040498
Are you actually going up Einstein's general relativity theory? Did your parents throw you on a wall when you were 2 or some shit?

There were successful experiments and failed experiments, also did you just say the Universe ITSELF is bending spacetime? Do you even FUCKING KNOW WHAT BENDING SPACETIME WITH MASS AND SPEED MEANS?

Oh fuck man I think this is the first time I got this upset over someone's stupidity in a scientific debate, I wouldn't even be this mad if you said a dog shit the universe or the big bang theory was false, but you fucking did it.

Congrats man, hopefully natural selection will get rid of you soon enough..

Anonymous Sat Sep 21 21:17:03 2013 No.6040939

>>6040498
>WHY DO I EVEN BOTHER
...to post inane drivel like this?
We don't know. If we did, it would revolutionize the field of psychology.

On another note, the structure of spacetime being interconnected with other laws of physics as it is, if the general theory of relativity were as wrong as you imply, your computer wouldn't work and we couldn't see your inane drivel on our screens, which also would not work.

But I'm seeing your inane drivel being formed in the liquid crystal patterns in front of me, thus, general relativity works.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 21 21:22:02 2013 No.6040944 File: 19 KB, 367x451, faggot.gif.png.jpg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6040498 >going mad while shitposting in a troll thread

Anonymous Sat Sep 21 21:38:03 2013 No.6040967

>>6040935
>There were successful experiments and failed experiments
This is what I said

>the Universe ITSELF is bending spacetime?
I clearly said you implied matter was bending spacetime. I never make this claim. I say mean that believing the universe must change in order to explain phenomena is absurdity.

Wow. /sci/ kids.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 21 21:52:43 2013 No.6040988 >>6040967 Protip: failed experiments is not synonymous with proven false

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 22 02:28:41 2013 No.6041337 >>6040988 Falsification with objective observations is the only way to prove something wrong.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 22 06:51:49 2013 No.6041624 >>6027085 do you live in a tent

>>	aether !0hUsPtRODs Sun Sep 22 06:54:18 2013 No.6041635 File: 27 KB, 640x480, 12.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6041624 No, my room is messy and painted red.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 22 06:59:31 2013 No.6041643 >>6041635 You look homosexual. I mean that in a good way.

>>	aether !0hUsPtRODs Sun Sep 22 07:05:58 2013 No.6041656 >>6041643 It's my cubic intellect.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 22 07:08:58 2013 No.6041662 >>6041656 Probably more to do with you making my penis hard, but sure whatever.

>>	aether !0hUsPtRODs Sun Sep 22 07:21:29 2013 No.6041685 >>6041662 Why do we write from left to right?

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 22 07:25:58 2013 No.6041692 >>6041685 rest in peace sock 7:21am-7:25am

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 22 07:29:29 2013 No.6041698 >>6041685 Because convention, not all languages do this. It's arbitrary. Also, take off your pants.

aether !0hUsPtRODs Sun Sep 22 07:34:56 2013 No.6041711

>>6041698
That's not why we do at all, that is how we came to write from left to right, not why we do. Why we do is because left and right are opposites, and to make sense of the word (or as a cubic intellectual would say, worship one corner), we have to choose one as the starting point and one as the ending point, since what we write must make sense, or equate something (equate to one 010101, as cubics say). The only way to cause this division is to pick one side as the beginning.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 22 07:41:28 2013 No.6041724 >>6041711 And this is why you shouldn't mix psychedelics.

>>	aether !0hUsPtRODs Sun Sep 22 07:43:29 2013 No.6041729 >>6041724 Actually, it's the difference between taking notice of what you are saying and analyzing what you're doing with your hands (plus other body parts).

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 22 07:44:57 2013 No.6041733 >>6041698 He shouldn't bother with the pants, I already finished and took a shower.

>>	aether !0hUsPtRODs Sun Sep 22 07:46:28 2013 No.6041737 >>6041733 >from now on focused on one corner >was just speaking truth

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 22 08:08:57 2013 No.6041782 >>6041729 Actually, it's just being pedantic / insane. When people ask that question, there's a clause implied. "Why do we write from left to right [as opposed to right to left]" Dunno what drugs you took today but I'd suggest stopping.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 22 08:16:15 2013 No.6041798 >>6041782 Maybe you should say what you actually mean instead of implying shit, then the insane man wouldn't act so insane.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 22 08:24:46 2013 No.6041806 >>6041798 I bet you talk about your feelings when an interviewer asks 'How's it going?' It's called social intelligence.

>>	aether !0hUsPtRODs Sun Sep 22 08:31:35 2013 No.6041818 File: 26 KB, 640x480, 11.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6041798 Let's say I was explaining what it is to be insane, but I was explaining insanity in such a harmonious way that my intelligence was above your sane state of mind.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 22 08:48:33 2013 No.6041848 >>6041818 Sorry kid, you're just another (possibly schizophrenic) pseudo-intellectual. Nice body though.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 22 09:04:47 2013 No.6041859 >>6027639 I think you meant general gravitation theory. Not relativity.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 22 09:37:15 2013 No.6041887 >>6041848 >nice body Hardly. He's in serious need of some lifting.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 22 12:05:02 2013 No.6042071 >>6031459 Intelligence =/= Intelligence Quotient

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 22 12:07:26 2013 No.6042073 >>6033360 This is true. It's mostly asians and white people that do this, though. Mexicans jump in after you get fed up. It's usually the ones that went through community college. But in Uni it's always the asians.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 22 12:09:58 2013 No.6042080 File: 43 KB, 423x438, 1346233042506.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6039418 So you're authenticity stems from your valued culture? What if you value japanese culture but live in America? Are you forever deemed immature? pic related

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 22 12:16:59 2013 No.6042099 >>6041782 Are you really saying that most asian languages are for drug abusers? Can a conduit be morphed to allow for energy to travel in a new direction? Or is it always going to be one direction with you types?

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 22 12:18:57 2013 No.6042102 >>6042099 It's all the adderall. If you are the electricity and have been the electricity then seeing it just as electricity isn't difficult at all.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 22 12:20:27 2013 No.6042103 >>6027085 Pretty much.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 23 01:46:44 2013 No.6043586 >>6042071 IQ is the scientific definition of intelligence.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 23 02:05:00 2013 No.6043610 >>6041887 I wish /fit/ would fuck off.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 23 02:33:25 2013 No.6043654 Telepath here, call me, OP. (Cuz this opens the channel)

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 23 02:35:56 2013 No.6043657 >>6043654 Also, moral relativism, self-annihilation, Satanism, reality tunnel, LIZARDS, etc. If you were there, you'd know what this means. And I'm not even trolling.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 23 02:35:56 2013 No.6043658 >>6043610 I wish /pedo/ would fuck off

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 23 02:37:55 2013 No.6043659 >>6027177 Does every fucking /sci/ thread need to involve Feynman?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 23 02:40:57 2013 No.6043661 >>6043657 EGO FILTERS (the faculties that orchestrate how the mind interprets ambiguity)

Anonymous Mon Sep 23 08:19:15 2013 No.6043924

>>6027734
>If the mathematics works and its consistent with observation then it works
Not even the same guy, but no, christ fuck, no.
Universe doesn't give half a shit about your theories. Math might work, experiments might show what appears to be within a margin of error for the theory and that very specific experiment using real, nonideal materials. That's about it. You can't get better than that. Tomorrow you might get an experiment that proves the theory completely wrong. GR might have one.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 23 08:21:14 2013 No.6043926 >>6031434 >what are axioms >principia mathematica lelelele

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 23 08:23:16 2013 No.6043931 >>6040890 Look up the study yourself faggot. Chimps have insanely good memory. Photographic memory is a usual thing for them.

Anonymous Mon Sep 23 09:44:20 2013 No.6044009

I like Feynman more as a man then as scientist. Not because he`s not doing his job right but because he does not have that illness that most "intellectuals" have, he exposes ego of those science elite and shows how insecure fraigle it is. I like how he respects simplicity and intuition rather than autism and hurr durr look at me I am smart.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 23 19:10:16 2013 No.6044881 >>6044009 If you knew his biography, you'd know that the exact opposite of what you posted is true.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 23 22:52:15 2013 No.6045178 File: 626 KB, 1525x1946, 1343088025475.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6027815 only in math and math related classes

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 23 23:11:44 2013 No.6045211 File: 55 KB, 740x312, certainty.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>6045178

Anonymous Tue Sep 24 01:52:22 2013 No.6045439

>>6045178
I stopped caring about math when I was introduced to the concept of imaginary numbers. What a crock of shit. If your equation can only be solved by inventing numbers that can't exist, like some kind of math deity , then you are fucking wrong and the math is flawed. Same for algebra solutions that basically say "the correct answer is whatever the correct answer is". Thats what the math said transcribed to words but god forbid if i wrote in down in english instead of the ancient math runes the teacher word mark me wrong.

Math is logical and numbers never lie my ass. Math is just as flawed as any other human construct.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 24 02:04:26 2013 No.6045454 >>6045439 someone's butthurt they couldn't complex plane

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 24 02:08:28 2013 No.6045458 >>6045454 its copypasta

Anonymous Tue Sep 24 03:02:07 2013 No.6045513

I'm not saying science itself is flawed as a concept nor do I believe in the supernatural but many scientiests tend to love the smell of their own farts as much as the next guy because they too are humans afterall.

I suppose one thing that's actually flawed is the notion of intellectual exceptionalism, when the whole point about being exceptional is to be rare and there being too many people thinking they're special to make them really extraordinary. If they all were infact extraordinary in a positive sense it would a contradiction to the nature of the concept because being special would be the norm hence making nobody special.

I my humble opinion what's perceived as intelligence is mostly a product of the particular environment and lucky circumstances rather than a consequence of personal superiority.

Anonymous Tue Sep 24 18:32:13 2013 No.6046692

>>6045513
>I my humble opinion what's perceived as intelligence is mostly a product of the particular environment and lucky circumstances rather than a consequence of personal superiority.

Your opinion is irrelevant to science. In science intelligence is defined by IQ.

>>	Anonymous Wed Sep 25 01:54:15 2013 No.6047386 >>6045513 Genetic influences on intelligence exist.

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 26 01:35:53 2013 No.6049163 >>6047386 Name one.

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 26 19:03:14 2013 No.6050344 >>6047386 They cannot exist because all humans are equal.

>>	Anonymous Fri Sep 27 01:54:55 2013 No.6050895 >>6050344 What about other species?

>>	Anonymous Fri Sep 27 01:55:55 2013 No.6050898 >>6046692 >in science intelligence is defined by IQ maybe in psychology.

>>	Anonymous Fri Sep 27 18:04:03 2013 No.6052601 >>6050898 Psychology is a science.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 28 03:07:23 2013 No.6053521 >>6050898 It is also a hard science.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 28 17:06:36 2013 No.6055059 >>6050895 By what definition of species?

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 29 03:47:15 2013 No.6056281 >>6055059 A species is a presheaf over the permutation category.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 29 17:01:15 2013 No.6057747 >>6056281 Does that mean evolution is just a morphism of presheaves, i.e. a natural transformation?

Anonymous Mon Sep 30 02:24:45 2013 No.6058672

>>6027085
>>6041635
>>6027207
>>6027383
>>6041818

>posting your face on 4chan

Nigga what the fuck are you doing. One of these days, you're gonna get dox'd by some random faggot dragon dildo licking autist. And then you will be in a world of shit.

Listen to me OP. YOU WILL BE IN A WORLD OF SHIT.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 30 02:36:32 2013 No.6058692 I learned college level math and college level Japanese 101 in the comfort of my own home, google, local library, ebay book hunting.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 30 02:41:02 2013 No.6058696 >>6058692 What do you mean by college level math?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 30 03:02:55 2013 No.6058711 >>6027639 >open to ideas >people with disdain of others with different thoughts are less intelligent than me >I am more intelligent than people who perceive racial and gender issues differently than me Nice open mind bro

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 30 04:02:25 2013 No.6058781 >>6057747 Yes, and this is why you should not believe in it.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 30 19:25:36 2013 No.6059947 >>6058781 What should I believe?

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 1 05:15:54 2013 No.6060807 >>6059947 The other theory.

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 1 16:58:10 2013 No.6061712 >>6027126 >I learn physics in my university and philosophy in my bedroom. So that's what you're doing in your bedroom instead of having sex.

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 2 05:22:12 2013 No.6062914 >>6058711 It has been scientifically proven that racists are less intelligent.

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 2 19:16:20 2013 No.6064023 >>6060807 Which one?

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 3 04:26:13 2013 No.6064907 >>6064023 It is explained here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sh5GCwt9PDs

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 3 17:25:34 2013 No.6065961 >>6064907 Thank you for the informative video I didn't understand. What is the multiverse?

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 3 18:06:37 2013 No.6066075 >>6039438 definitely a porch monkey.

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 3 18:23:37 2013 No.6066111 >>6062914 Everybody is (more or less slightly) racist, but the amount of racism correlates negatively with intelligence.

Anonymous Thu Oct 3 18:28:37 2013 No.6066134

>>6062914

Aww , that's fucking sweet. We have ourselves an intellectual nigger here like Cornell West.

He's probably referring to this shitty study that was all over the media: http://pss.sagepub.com/content/early/2012/01/04/0956797611421206.abstract

However it was fucking mutilated as bad research by this post: http://wmbriggs.com/blog/?p=5118

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 4 04:15:36 2013 No.6067303 >>6066134 >He's probably referring to this shitty study that was all over the media There are other studies.

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 4 09:59:52 2013 No.6067661 >>6066111 Correlation does not imply causation.

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 4 16:14:00 2013 No.6068331 >>6067303 Yeah? Then cite them?? Btw , check out this site: http://erectuswalksamongst.us/ Since it shows why black people are inferior..

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 4 16:34:55 2013 No.6068396 File: 132 KB, 640x480, 2013-03-15 01-34-09.184.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] The weekend is here. Study hard, work out.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 5 05:21:48 2013 No.6069535 >>6068396 Thank you for the great advice.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 5 18:24:09 2013 No.6070791 >>6068396 >Study hard, work out. I did both.

>>	Anonymous Sun Oct 6 05:36:18 2013 No.6071641 >>6068331 Syncopated babbling of racist and delusional cranks is incompatible with this board.

>>	Anonymous Sun Oct 6 17:06:59 2013 No.6072558 >>6068396 Nice facial aesthetics.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 7 05:58:47 2013 No.6073483 >>6067661 Causation implies correlation.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 7 16:44:25 2013 No.6074553 >>6073483 You got it the wrong way round.

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 8 06:39:52 2013 No.6076159 >>6074553 The statement is biconditional.

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 8 15:47:13 2013 No.6077156 >>6067661 It does. Do you even AGW?

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 8 22:42:45 2013 No.6078204 >>6027085 YOU A NIGGER

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 8 23:59:07 2013 No.6078333 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9cflCyyEA2I think again, op

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 9 09:23:50 2013 No.6078962 >>6078204 It's just the lighting in the photo. If you saw his other thread, you'd see he's white.

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 9 17:46:35 2013 No.6080033 Intellectualism is not the same as conformism.

Anonymous Thu Oct 10 03:02:09 2013 No.6081031

>>6050344
But some humans are better than other humans at different things

We have the ability to become equal if we try hard at whatever a person is trying but you aren't really equal then

For example a fat man born who was born fat
is not as fast as a skinny man

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 10 17:47:16 2013 No.6082219 >>6081031 >But some humans are better than other humans at different things But all humans are of equal intelligence.

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 11 10:13:40 2013 No.6083446 >>6081031 >For example a fat man born who was born fat You are not born fat. That's your decisions. You decide to eat too much.

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 11 20:02:16 2013 No.6084244 >>6081031 >For example a fat man born who was born fat >is not as fast as a skinny man What if the skinny man is Steven Hawking?

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 11 20:08:46 2013 No.6084267 >>6058672 >>>/soc/

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 12 17:14:53 2013 No.6085591 >>6058672 Cyberbullying is not a real issue. He can just go away from the computer.

>>	Anonymous Sun Oct 13 09:31:29 2013 No.6086797 >>6078333 That video crashed my browser.

>>	Anonymous Sun Oct 13 19:19:42 2013 No.6088109 That's why I dropped out.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 14 06:45:08 2013 No.6089313 >>6027132 >Why is something considered incorrect to intellectuals? Because it contradicts the laws of logic and science.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 14 17:50:11 2013 No.6090263 OP is 2cool4school

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 14 17:59:11 2013 No.6090283 File: 87 KB, 640x480, one-month-anniversary[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >let it flow >let yourself go >slow and low >that is the tempo

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 14 23:14:37 2013 No.6090884 i dont care if you ask gay questions and get gay answers. i don't fucking care. stay trippin fags. it is what it is.

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 15 00:14:39 2013 No.6090967 >>6082219 Someone's trolling

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 15 00:37:09 2013 No.6090993 >>6027085 To not question and experiment against what you believe to be fact already won't get you far.

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 15 00:37:09 2013 No.6090994 >>6027383 >Just got let out a Auschwitz, huh skinnyfag? Lift and eat my friend.

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 15 00:37:39 2013 No.6090995 >>6090283 Why are you so autistic?

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 15 10:21:18 2013 No.6091688 >>6090993 This. We shouldn't question scientific theories.

>>	Anonymous Tue Oct 15 19:02:39 2013 No.6092624 >>6090995 How do you diagnose "autism" over the internet?

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 16 08:52:44 2013 No.6093597 >>6092624 He doesn't. He abuses it as a buzzword.

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 16 18:41:15 2013 No.6094680 >>6090283 >1 month >anniversary Do you even know the meaning of the word "anniversary"? Do you understand its etymological origin?

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 16 18:49:43 2013 No.6094696 >>6094680 > implying people don't use anniversary for things besides the time it takes to travel around the sun

>>	Anonymous Wed Oct 16 18:52:44 2013 No.6094708 File: 94 KB, 600x860, 1380318370814.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >aether !0hUsPtRODs lel

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 17 09:23:53 2013 No.6095940 Feels good to be a modern day intellectual. I don't need to think for myself.

>>	Anonymous Thu Oct 17 22:22:00 2013 No.6097213 >>6094696 A "one month anniversary" is not an "anniversary" but a "mensiversary".

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 18 10:40:50 2013 No.6098077 >>6090995 OCD =/= autism

>>	Anonymous Fri Oct 18 18:59:02 2013 No.6098962 >>6027132 >Einsteins theory of energy is socially accepted, but that does not mean it is correct Don't worry, OP. A little boy with a baseball cap is going to revolutionize physics and society in general.

>>	Anonymous Sat Oct 19 12:33:20 2013 No.6100433 >>6098962 I can't even imagine the social implications of his discovery.

>>	Anonymous Sun Oct 20 08:39:37 2013 No.6102365 >>6027132 >What is knowledge (to modern day intellectuals)? Knowledge is information stored in the brain.

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]

/sci/ - Science & Math