[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 1.63 MB, 300x200, 1365711479152.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6001828 No.6001828 [Reply] [Original]

http://planetsave.com/2013/08/26/swedish-engineers-invent-nano-gas-that-instantly-neutralizes-carbon-pollution/

So what do you think?

>> No.6001834

>>6001828
I think that's fucking cool, but we'll have to wait and see how testing turns out.

>> No.6001837

>>6001834
oh yeah, here's the "data", don't know how unbiased it is: http://revolution-green.com/2013/07/29/hydro-nano-gas-or-hng-an-answer-to-greenhouse-gases/

>> No.6001843

Great, now we'll go full retard with that solution and have it bite us in the ass in the future.

>> No.6001846

>>6001843
Right? Right? We're totally fucking boned if this becomes common practice.

>> No.6001849

I for one am looking forward to it killing all plant life on earth by starving them of CO2.

>> No.6001851

lol

the nano gas becomes the next pollution that's going to kill us

>> No.6001855

>>6001849
>>6001851
Come on guys, these are not legitimate concerns.

>> No.6001872

I can't think of anything that could possibly go wrong. Fund it

>> No.6001878 [DELETED] 

Great! Let's do this!

>A few years:
>Swedish Engineers Invent ‘Micro Gas’ That ‘Instantly Neutralizes’ Nano Gas Pollution

>> No.6001882

Great! Let's do this!

>A few years later:
>Swedish Engineers Invent ‘Micro Gas’ That ‘Instantly Neutralizes’ Nano Gas Pollution

>> No.6001898

>>6001828
It's grade A bullshit.

WTF is a a nanogas? Why is it INCREASING nitrous oxide emissions? Why didn't they measure particulate emissions?

Burning is already an incredibly efficient process. Their results are far from unbiased

>> No.6001900

>>6001898
Also, not published in a peer reviewed journal.

>> No.6001918

Lel, Sweden cannot into science.

>> No.6001944

>hydrogen nano gas
hydrogen is already smaller then the nano scale

>> No.6001959

>>6001944
Holy shit, none of the hundreds/thousands of people who found out about this never realised what you just said. You're fucking amazing mate, did you finish highschool or something?

In all seriousness though, hydrogen nano gas only implies it has a lot of hydrogen in its structure.

>> No.6002105

Come on, this is pretty significant shit right here, how come no one is interested?

>> No.6002118

>>6002105
Because its a blog, if it were published in some (respectable) journal then that would be different.

>> No.6002144

So are they talking about a very fine mist of water with minerals dissolved in it which absorb CO2 (such as olivine)?

Might work.

>> No.6002160

>>6002144
Okay, I have visited the site, and it is nothing to do with carbon-absorbing minerals:
http://www.hydroinfra.com/en/solutions/how-hng-works/

I haven't worked out all of the details, but it's some gimmick for improving combustion. What the test result PDF actually shows is a reduction of carbon MONoxide emissions.

Some idiot marketer has taken that and gone around shouting that it eliminates carbon DIoxide emissions.

>> No.6002163

>>6002144
>>6002160
Stop talking out of your ass.

>> No.6002168

>>6002105
I'm not seeing anything of interest here... There's a blog that links what seems to be a news site as its source. Flat earthers are more credible than this.

>> No.6002177

>>6002163
Go fuck yourself. I went and actually read the "documentation":
http://www.hydroinfra.com/en/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2013/06/HIT-VerifReport-draft7-130710.pdf

Read it. What they claim the tests show is that CO2 emission goes up, and CO emission goes down, when they inject their gas. It's a thing to make combustion more complete.

Read this crazy shit (obviously written by some marketing twerp):
http://www.hydroinfra.com/en/solutions/what-is-hng/

Whatever HNG really is, they're making it out of water. Maybe it is simply water, maybe it's a mixture of water and molecular hydrogen and oxygen.

But whatever it is, it's not going to prevent carbon dioxide emissions.

>> No.6002181

>>6002177
>Maybe it is simply water, maybe it's a mixture of water and molecular hydrogen and oxygen.
...or maybe it's a plasma spray. That would get better combustion out of a shitty combustion chamber.

>> No.6002207

>>6001849
>>6001851
>>6001846
>>6001843

Hippies. Hippies everywhere

>> No.6002216

>>6002144
>>olivine
Excellent, I've always wanted to put sand in my engine!

>> No.6002225

>>6002216
Well, when I was guessing it was something like that, I was under the impression that it was for stuff like coal furnaces.

>> No.6002234
File: 611 KB, 960x1299, science.fiction.in.a.nutshell.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6002234

I think we must fear science.
The only way we could possibly fight global warming is by shunning all technology.
Change is bad.
This gas is just us playing God.