[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 1018 KB, 250x251, birdss.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5983302 No.5983302 [Reply] [Original]

What are birds?

>> No.5983309
File: 994 KB, 250x250, we just dont know.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5983309

>> No.5983308

we just don't know

>> No.5983318

>>5983308
>>5983309
nope, they are dinosaurs

>> No.5984519

>>5983318
That's absurd.

>> No.5984532

tasty

>> No.5984558

chicken

>> No.5984568

what <span class="math">are[/spoiler] birds?

>> No.5984607
File: 19 KB, 550x733, 1376349468647.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5984607

>whoami

>> No.5984678
File: 265 KB, 550x733, whoWho.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5984678

>>5984607

>> No.5984747

according to geology 175 they are dinosaurs

>> No.5984810

>>5984519
Yes, but I hear this all the time. Especially from little kids. I think they are taught this at school.

>> No.5986309

>>5984747
>>5984810
Birds are not dinosaurs, you fucking pseudo-intellectual faggots. Birds EVOLVED from dinosaurs. That doesn't mean they are dinosaurs. It's like saying humans are mice because we evolved from apes and apes evolved from mice. Absolutely idiotic.

>> No.5986317

>>5986309

Lungfish are still fish.

>> No.5986323

Aves

>> No.5987975

>>5986317
Birds are not fish.

>> No.5989061

>>5984678
Hardly readable. You should have chosen a better font.

>> No.5989062

>>5987975

axially, that depends on the level of cladistics one is using

>> No.5990830

>>5989062
What level of cladistics are birds?

>> No.5992361

>>5990830
Are they a class or a phylum?

>> No.5993963

>>5992361
Does anybody know?

>> No.5993969
File: 456 KB, 420x315, 1363043001060.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5993969

>>5993963

Nobody knows

>> No.5993974

they (like us) are descendants of the dinosaurs. Where we evolved from species like the anklyosaur, birds evolved from raptors like jurasic park. Birds have really tiny teeth like the raptors had, but hardly use them since all they eat are bread from people at the pond and shit.

>> No.5994065

>>5986309
humans are mice

>> No.5994073

>>5986309
Actually, saying that birds are dinosaurs is more like saying that primates are mammals, which is absolutely correct. If you disagree, please read up on your basic phylogeny.

>> No.5994076

>tfw no books on the lepidopterus arboratus

>> No.5994094

>>5994076
>lepidopterus arboratus
Can you tell what we're looking for yet?

>> No.5994384

The handy never wrong way of classifying birds:
They are a type of theropod dinosaur that has many thousands of different species and extinct types include the velociraptor.

>> No.5995637

Birds (class Aves or clade Avialae) are feathered, winged, bipedal, endothermic (warm-blooded), egg-laying, vertebrate animals.

>> No.5997384

>>5995637
What is the difference between a clade and a class?

>> No.5998785

>>5997384
Any zoologists here?

>> No.5998852
File: 419 KB, 648x1854, 20130828.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5998852

Birds are dinosaurs. Pic related.

>> No.5998861

birds are dumbshits

>> No.5998873

Why are birds?

>> No.5999786

>>5983309
Jesus christ I loved these videos.

>> No.5999798

>>5998861
>implying

inb4 "huurrrr durr ur a bird faget"

>> No.5999822

just birds

>> No.6001349

>>5998852
Source on the comic?

>> No.6001364

>>6001349
smbc-comics.com

>> No.6002991

>>6001364
thank you

>> No.6003017

>>5997384

A clade is a group of animals which all share a common ancestor, it's a natural group and can be a class if it's at that taxonomical level. A class is a taxonomical level that's under phylum and above order, it can be a clade if it's a natural taxon (one that's phylogenetically correct in its structure) or it can be an artificial taxa if it's members don't share a common ancestor.

Cladistically birds, clade Aviales, are members of Paraves, which groups raptors and all bird-like dinosaurs, which in itself is part of Sauropsida which groups all reptiles and birds and all non-synapsid amniotes.

Taxonomically Aves is an artificial taxa (because it excludes the common ancestor of birds which was a reptile) which is a class in the phylum Chordata, and part of the superclass Tetrapoda.

>> No.6003021

>>6003017

Correcting myself, a clade is a group of organisms, not necessarily animals.

>>5993974

As much as I'd love to say I'm descended from a dinosaur, mammals descended from the therapsids (clade Synapsida) which descended from pelycosaurs. Pelycosaurs branched from other amniotes very early, before the appearence of what you might call dinosaurs (clade Dinosauriformes)

>> No.6003042

>>5994073
huh? wouldn';t that be more like saying birds are reptiles? Dinosaurs are like reptiles right?

>> No.6003153

>>6003017
>Taxonomically Aves is an artificial taxa (because it excludes the common ancestor of birds which was a reptile) which is a class in the phylum Chordata, and part of the superclass Tetrapoda.
Aves has like shitton of definitions. More concrete-defined groups are Paraves, Avialae, Neornithes etc. Neornithes, for instance, is a crown-based taxon, containing all modern birds.
And since when birds polyphiletic? They all share a common ancestor, which is also a bird.

>> No.6003168

>>6003042
"Reptilia" is an artificial group, or "evolutionary grade", that explicitly excludes birds and mammals.
Sometimes though "Reptilia" is defined as a synonym of Sauropsida, or as a subclade of Sauropsida containing all modern reptiles. By these definitions yes, birds are reptiles.

>> No.6003187

>>6003153

Birds aren't polyphiletic but as far as I know the latest common ancestor isn't included in Aves so it can't be defined as a "natural" taxa, and like you said Aves has a shitton of definitions and can't really be called a "clade", some of the other groupings you named are more phylogenetically correct.

>> No.6004159

>>6003017
Thank you.

>> No.6005541

Birds are animals that can fly.

>> No.6005549

>>6005541

What are lungfish?

>> No.6006663

>>6005549
Lungfish are fish and not animals.

>> No.6007706

>>5983302
organisms that show signs of intelligence and can fly

>> No.6008443

>>6007706
>signs of intelligence

How would you design an IQ test for birds?

>> No.6010138

>>6008443
Let them take an IQ test for humans.

>> No.6011952

Birds are all animals that are neither mammals nor reptiles.

>> No.6011963

>>6008443
Considering human children don't understand delayed gratification[1] but some birds do[2], I would say they are somewhat "intelligent".

[1] http://harbaugh.uoregon.edu/Readings/UGBE/Mischel%201989%20Science,%20Delay%20of%20Gratification.pdf
[2] http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1901/jeab.1974.21-485/abstract

>> No.6011986

>>6010138
Hah, and if they don't take it, then they are dumb.

>> No.6012017

where did this joke even come from?

>> No.6012754

>>6012017
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wfvEgWINUFc

>> No.6013576

>>6012754
thanks

>> No.6015722

Most birds are not mammals.