Troll scientist quotes

[Anonymous No.5950917]

[Anonymous No.5950918]

[Anonymous No.5951015]

2/7

[Anonymous No.5951013]

I have a few of these saved from the previous thread.
1/7

[Anonymous No.5951021]

3/7

[Anonymous No.5951023]

4/7

[Anonymous No.5951026]

5/7

[Anonymous No.5951028]

>>5951013
>from the previous thread.
So why does your image have a facebook filename?

[Anonymous No.5951029]

6/7

[Anonymous No.5951033]

7/7

>>5951028
That's the only pic that does not came from the previous thread. I don't know why it has a filename like that now that you made me think of it. It's in my fake quotes folder since too long for me to remember.

[Anonymous No.5951039]

OC

[Anonymous No.5951047]

>>5951029
lel

[Anonymous No.5951090]

[Anonymous No.5951094]

"According to genetics, blacks are people too" - Richard Dawkins

[Anonymous No.5951105]

>>5951026
You leave Attenborough alone

[Anonymous No.5951110]

>>5951039
I giggled.

[Anonymous No.5951112]

[Anonymous No.5951121]

>>5951112

>-Neil 'smoke' DeGrass Tyseon

[Anonymous No.5951135]

[Anonymous No.5951143]

[Anonymous No.5951154]

>>5951121
HHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA! Fuck, I KEK'd hard at dat.

[Anonymous No.5951156]

>>5951135
TOP KEK!

[sMk !ArcH9WpopA No.5951160]

[Anonymous No.5951162]

[Anonymous No.5951164]

[Anonymous No.5951165]

[Anonymous No.5951166]

>>5951164
>saving text as a jpg
>drowning the letters in artifacts
>4p
How the hell is one supposed to read this?

[Anonymous No.5951196]

>>5951166
One is not supposed to read it.

[Anonymous No.5951197]

>>5951166
You have led to a false conclusion for the purpose of laughing.

[Anonymous No.5951202]

>>5951166
I think it's the point...

[Anonymous No.5951205]

>>5951166
>Religion has actually convinced people that there's an invisible man - living in the sky - who watches everything you do, every minute of every day. [...]
Is there something wrong with your eyes?

[Anonymous No.5951293]

>>5951166
OMG, I hope for you that was counter-trolling.
If so, it worked.
If not, kill yourself. I mean, really. I pay for the rope.

[Anonymous No.5952490]

>>5951033
this is the best

[Anonymous No.5952503]

[Anonymous No.5952507]

>>5950917
I almost regret making that pic. It was posted in /pol/ in a MUH FEDORA VS MUH DEAD JEW ON A STICK thread and some people actually fell for it/argued if it was true.

Oh, well whatever. 2/3.

[Anonymous No.5952508]

>>5952507
and 3/3.

[Anonymous No.5952510]

>>5952507
>It was posted in /pol/ in a MUH FEDORA VS MUH DEAD JEW ON A STICK thread and some people actually fell for it/argued if it was true.
Oh wow this is fantastic.

[Anonymous No.5952512]

>>5952507
If you really did create that one congratulations on a great meme, obviously the irony evaded those idiots

[Anonymous No.5952518]

OC

[Anonymous No.5952519]

>>5952510
Also just saying that you can avoid to change the colors with the background if you just do white letters in black borders like I do, and it's pretty easy to do with anything above paint. If you prefer it that way alright, just that I use that because it can be read in any background.

And yeah. There were more intelligent people saying 'No way a biologist said that, that's not a mystery fuck' and dumber people that believed 'of course he said it, otherwise there wouldn't be a picture' was a good argument

>>5952512
>If you really did create that one congratulations on a great meme

oh gosh apparently my OC is good enough for people to doubt if I really did it. that's a compliment I guess.

but yeah, the original filename was 'the mind of a creationist.jpg', because you know, the typical 'IF MEN CAME FROM MONKEYS WHY ARE THERE STILL MONKEYS'

Maybe it's because I'm a Biology undergrad and that rustles my jimmies more than stuff like people saying that the Bing Bang is a religion and that kind of stuff, but it's like 'OH YEAH MAN YOU JUST OUTFOXED EVERY BIOLOGISTS THAT HAS EVER LIVED IN THE LAST 150 YEARS, GJ'. And worst of all Dawkins has said himself that it's the most common question he has to face on evolution. So it really wrote itself.

[Anonymous No.5952523]

>>5952507
How did you not see that coming?

[Anonymous No.5952525]

>>5952523
I thought that maybe that could fool someone if someone actually tried to get it on tumblr or facebook. Not on /pol/ some weeks after I made it.

I dunno, man, I shouldn't be surprised by trolls and fools in /pol/ anymore, it was just unexpected. Of course I guess using Dawkins played a big part in it, he gets a lot of bad rap because of the whole God Delusion thing and the fanbase it created (I much prefer his books on actual biology and haven't bothered reading it, but his actitude it already going too off-topic I think)

[Anonymous No.5952526]

>>5952525
also the pic was for
>>5952518

[Anonymous No.5952540]

[Anonymous No.5952566]

[Anonymous No.5952573]

[Anonymous No.5952578]

[Anonymous No.5952952]

>>5952578
you're doing it wrong

[Anonymous No.5953095]

>>5952510
Bu-but that is physically impossible!

[Anonymous No.5953148]

>>5951029

Technically that's sort of true, if we built 10,000 different towers and ran planes into them, maybe a couple would survive, and then maybe we would take the designs of those surviving towers and create more, sort of like some form of artificial procreation.

[Anonymous No.5953173]

>>5953148
Do we have enough planes for that kind of plan?

[Anonymous No.5953193]

>>5953173
And, more importantly, do we have enough willing people to full the skyscrapers?

[Anonymous No.5953353]

>>5952507
Algebra was created by Al-Jabr an arab.

Fuck off

[Anonymous No.5953372]

Every single one of these people lived a boring and dull life. They were terrible at parties and would bore the shit out of you within 30 mins.

Why would you want to waste your live trying to understand something that is infinitely complex? You have one life, one chance at it, why the fuck would you spend that precious time on mathematics?

[Anonymous No.5953381]

[Anonymous No.5953385]

[Anonymous No.5953386]

>>5953381
The grammar really bothers me.

[Anonymous No.5953387]

>>5953353
>a fake troll scientists quote has fake troll info? fuck off!

[Anonymous No.5953390]

>>5953353
These are obviously all made for fun.

Al-Jabr is the Arabic name of Algebra. Al-Khwarizmi invented Algebra, and he was Persian.

Sage for off-topic

[Anonymous No.5953391]

>>5953353
Nope, created by Indians. Arabs just go to it before us.

[Anonymous No.5953396]

[Anonymous No.5953436]

[Anonymous No.5953458]

>>5953391
Suck my indecisive cock you curry smelling faggot.

Only thing your community invented is rape, corruption and how to live without sanitation.

[Anonymous No.5953463]

>>5953458
I have no idea what is going on in this thread but I lol'd hard

[Anonymous No.5953485]

>>5953458
They also created that lie called "zero".

[Anonymous No.5953544]

>>5953458
lol'd hard

[Anonymous No.5953715]

[Anonymous No.5953729]

>>5951023

Jesus fuck

[Anonymous No.5953732]

>>5953715
again, they're supposed to be fake

[Anonymous No.5953735]

>>5953732
you don't get the irony?

[Anonymous No.5953741]

>>5953735
what irony?

[Anonymous No.5953760]

>>5953741
The dogmatism. Dawkins is always saying how great science is because it changes its views in light of new evidence, he'd never say something so closed minded.

I created that meme but I guess it was pretty weak in hindsight. Let me have another go at some OC..

[Anonymous No.5953764]

>>5953760
What dogmatism? Atheism is no dogma. Dismissing fairy tales is just rational, scientific and logical. Do you even Hitchens razor?

[Anonymous No.5953768]

>>5953764
>'You shouldn't even question that'

I get it, it was a shit meme

[Anonymous No.5953776]

>>5953768
There is no reason to question facts. Only creationists question evolution.

[Anonymous No.5953777]

>>5953776
Oh good. You're one of *them*.

[Anonymous No.5953779]

>>5953764
If hitches was so powerful why did he die of cancer?

If hitchens was right, why does his razor contradicts itself?

If athiesm is not a religion, then why the fedoras have to constantly defend their shit so vigorously?

>I don't believe in anything, so I can hang with the other hipsters

No, whether you believe or don't believe, don't do it for others, do it for a reason. My policy is to live and let live, but forcing yourself to be a part of something that suffocates you is wrong,which is how I tend to feel about religion.

I wish we could take the cult out of hte equation and just focus on God. The who is right and wrong bullshit debate would end permanently.

[Anonymous No.5953784]

>>5953776
that's easy to say once you've studied evolutionary theory and understood it. If Dawkins just told you evolution is fact and wouldn't give you any reasons why then he'd be dogmatic

[Anonymous No.5953786]

>>5951162
fuck you

[Anonymous No.5953788]

>>5953784
Dawkins is a scientist. Of course I prefer to believe him instead of believing an ancient fairy tale book.

[Anonymous No.5953792]

>>5953788
So you believe in evolution on Dawkins' authority? I know it's not the best meme but no wonder you didn't get >>5953715

[Anonymous No.5953796]

>>5953779
>If hitchens was right, why does his razor contradicts itself?
It doesn't. Hitchens razor is not a theory but an axiom.

>If athiesm is not a religion, then why the fedoras have to constantly defend their shit so vigorously?
Because we are constantly being attacked and oppressed by the christfags. They want to ban evolution from the class room and teach creationism instead.

>but forcing yourself to be a part of something that suffocates you is wrong
That's exactly why religion is wrong.

[Anonymous No.5953799]

>>5953788
Dawkins said it and he's a scientist so it must be true

[Anonymous No.5953801]

>>5953799
You would rather believe the hallucinations of ancient sheep herders than a science book? GTFO my /sci/.

[Anonymous No.5953802]

>>5953764
Can you prove that a god or any other unfalsifiable entity does or does not exist without special assumptions? It's irrational to take either position

[Anonymous No.5953804]

>>5953802
It's also irrational to think unicorns do not exist. I mean, prove they don't.

[Anonymous No.5953806]

>>5953458
India has a pretty low per capita incidence of rapes per nation.
India is one of the most populous developig nations however and has a high raw number.
China is also a populous developing nation but the difference is that state controlled media wouldn't be allowed to make apparent incidence of rape anyway.
So in effect, India's free and open media reporting on the nations' problems is perversely the source of foreigners scorning India while preferring nations that feature authoritarian, state-controlled press.

India's biggest problem with respect to sexual abuse today is the incompetence of authorities in handling the situation.

[Anonymous No.5953808]

>>5953802
If you think he's real, why don't you show him to me? Astronomers have researched the sky for centuries and they didn't find any wizard up there.

[Anonymous No.5953810]

>>5953804
I can't, and you can't prove that they do. The only intellectually reasonable position is to stay open and not outright reject or accept it

[Anonymous No.5953811]

>>5953802
>It's irrational to take either position
Oh right, so you practice every single cult on the planet just to be sure, right?

[Anonymous No.5953815]

>>5953811
No, you just completely failed to understand my post

[Anonymous No.5953816]

>>5953810
A-are you serious? Are you seriously implying that there's a reasonable possibility that the whole set of +700 pokemons exist in a single planet?

[Anonymous No.5953818]

>>5953801
Dawkins said it in 'The Selfish Gene' (a science book) so it must be fact

[Anonymous No.5953823]

>>5953816
Is there any methodology to test for or against this hypothesis? No? Then you have no way of knowing if it is true or not.

[Anonymous No.5953824]

>>5953815
No, we got your point. You haven't grown out of magical thinking yet and you are too insecure to embrace logic. >>>/x/ will be the right place for you.

[Anonymous No.5953825]

>>5953818
>>>/pol

Actually, Dawkins' works on biology are really neat, and his meme theory of genes is used on biology.

[Anonymous No.5953826]

>>5953823
But it's much more reasonable to think they do not exist, because... Uhgh you're trolling me I get it. Better leave this thread.

[Anonymous No.5953829]

>>5953823
>what is burden of proof

[Anonymous No.5953830]

>>5953815
No, I know what you mean. And while that is logically correct, it should be pointed out that

a: your position attaches no more importance to the existence of a God than to the existence of Pokemons
b: your position invalidates the pertinence of organized religion, making you a member of the large and heteroclite set known as atheists
c: universal doubt in general is a shitty philosophy for various reasons. One being that you should apply it to itself. The other being that your very behavior every day, the fact that you live like a human being, and so on, proves that you don't operate on universal doubt, but on a number of reasonable assumptions.

[Anonymous No.5953831]

>>5953826
It's hard to tell whether he's trolling. Some people are genuinely this retarded.

[Anonymous No.5953834]

>>5953825
Remember when you could say you really enjoyed Dawkins' books, back in 2005 and before, without being called the king of fedoras for it?

Yeah, me neither.

[Anonymous No.5953837]

>>5953834
I actually remember it. I mean, only /pol/ uses "fedora neckbeard atheist" as an insult, and /pol/ is the retarded part of 4chan. The problem is, they spill their shit all over the other boards.

[Anonymous No.5953839]

>>5952518
this is what atheists beleive

[Anonymous No.5953842]

>>5953386
>>5953386

and your autism bothers me

[Anonymous No.5953843]

>>5953839
To put it in /pol/ terms:

YES GOY KEEP DESPISING THEISTS, KEEP BELIEVING IN THE MAGICAL MAN IN THE SKY SO WE CAN ENSLAVE YOU BETTER

[Anonymous No.5953844]

>>5953839
>>5953830
>>5953823

[Anonymous No.5953845]

>>5953843
*ATHEISTS, goddamnit.

[Anonymous No.5953846]

>>5953826
scientists have already said there are infinite universes. So there's necessarily 1 in which every possibility is played out, including the existance of all 700+ pokemons on 1 planet and the existance of unicorms

[Anonymous No.5953848]

>>5953837
I didn't meant king of fedoras in that sense, but you know, people believing that if you like the Selfish Gene/the Extended Phenotype/the Ancetor's tale you are buying the whole Dawkins package. Some people don't even know that Dawkins has wrote anything else than the God Delusion, which I'm simply not interested in.

[Anonymous No.5953849]

>>5953830
HAHAHA OH WOW

10/10 if troll
7/10 if copypasta

>>5953846
>scientists have already said there are infinite universes
DAMN THOSE SURE ARE HOT OPINIONS
But since this is a science board, how about a peer-reviewed paper that supports your claims you nigger?


>>5953848
(I was just joking don't worry)

[Anonymous No.5953850]

>>5953846

[Anonymous No.5953852]

>>5953839
this >>5953818 is what religious people believe

[Anonymous No.5953856]

>>5953799
So you're replacing one dogmatic structure telling you what you should believe and replacing it with another?
Please leave.

[Anonymous No.5953857]

>>5953824
Why am I not embracing logic?

>>5953826
The existential quantifier like any other quantifier in most logics needs a domain of discourse to range over. How can you assert "¬∃" without specifying it?

>>5953829
Dictionary.com:
"the obligation to establish a contention as fact by evoking evidence of its probable truth."

>>5953830
>making you a member of the large and heteroclite set known as atheists
No, by definition atheists believe in the non-existent of god(s).

>The other being that your very behavior every day, the fact that you live like a human being, and so on, proves that you don't operate on universal doubt, but on a number of reasonable assumptions.
It's unreasonable to outright dismiss the Riemann hypothesis because nobody has proved it yet.

>>5953831
Why the insults?

[Anonymous No.5953858]

>>5953846
>>5953830
>>5953823

[Anonymous No.5953860]

>>5953857
*existence

[Anonymous No.5953861]

>>5953857
>by definition atheists believe in the non-existent of god(s).
But that's wrong you fucking retard. Atheists actually LACK the belief in a god. They do not "believe" there is no god, they lack the belief the god is there in the first point. I mean, I know you're a goddamn retarded and can't get the difference, but at least stop "trolling" and get out the science board jesus christ.

Reading your pathetic attempts of trolling just hurts me.

[Anonymous No.5953862]

>>5953857
>No, by definition atheists believe in the non-existent of god(s).
Your definition is wrong.

>It's unreasonable to outright dismiss the Riemann hypothesis because nobody has proved it yet.
Nobody would reasonably believe it is true if it hadn't been shown numerically that it holds up to very large values.

[Anonymous No.5953867]

>>5953808
>believes he is in the sky

Explain a cube to a 2 dimensional being. Go on, I'll wait.

[Anonymous No.5953868]

>>5953857
>It's unreasonable to outright dismiss the Riemann hypothesis because nobody has proved it yet.
A-are you serious

>that definition of atheism
Oh, now I get. You are trolling me, aren't you?

[Anonymous No.5953869]

>>5953861
>But that's wrong you fucking retard.
>Your definition is wrong.
And now we're debating semantics:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atheism
Atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.

>Nobody would reasonably believe it is true if it hadn't been shown numerically that it holds up to very large values.
>reasonably
Please define what you mean by this. Inductive reasoning doesn't always work.

>>5953868
>A-are you serious
yes

>You are trolling me, aren't you?
no

[Anonymous No.5953870]

>>5953867
The same way you explain a supersolid to someone who lives in a 3D world: you can't.

OH WAIT YOU ACTUALLY CAN THROUGH EQUATIONS

AND IT'S ACTUALLY STUDIED IN UNIVERSITIES

ALONG WITH 1D, 2D, AND nD

YOU ARE RETARDED

[Anonymous No.5953871]

>>5953856
I can't tell if you're trolling but I'll explain anyway.
Believing in evolution because Dawkins says it's true is just as dumb as believing that Noah built an arc and fit 2 of every animal on it because the Bible says so (OK maybe not quite as dumb but you get my point: You shouldn't believe things solely on authority).

You should believe in evolution because of the overwhelming evidence in favour of it, not just because a scientist says it. Yes, scientists are generally reliable sources of information, but you shouldn't believe everything they say just because they are scientists

[Anonymous No.5953876]

>>5953867
...through solid geometry?

[Anonymous No.5953877]

>>5953870
I-I-I just wanted to laugh at funny fake quotes and m-maybe find inspiration for some OC...

[Anonymous No.5953878]

>>5953870
still waiting

[Anonymous No.5953879]

>>5953877
and now I'm quoting for no reason

fuck me

Even arguing Dawkins' actual worth would be better than this

[Anonymous No.5953881]

>>5953869
>And now we're debating semantics:
We're not. You're being anal about people who don't believe in God, and call them atheist.
Whatever your "definition" is, you can't change it halfway through.

>Please define what you mean by this.
First stop using words like "define" in a context where they don't belong.
Second the reason people reasonably believe in Riemann hypothesis is induction.
If there was no numerical verification of it, it would be pure insanity to think that it's true.

>hey guys I have this function, I think it does that
>why do you think that? did you show it?
>no
>did you calculate it for and saw it holds true for many values?
>no
>...

[Anonymous No.5953883]

>>5953878
a x^3 + b x^2 + c x + d = 0

There you go idiot.

[Anonymous No.5953884]

>>5953869
Why are you posting Wikipedia's definition when it disagrees with you?

[Anonymous No.5953885]

>>5953877
Hastily constructed OC in the hope of getting this thread back on topic

[Anonymous No.5953886]

>>5953869
>moving the goal
>giving a link that disagrees with you
>being wrong and trying to appear right although everyone on this thread is disagreeing with you

What are you doing little troll?

[Anonymous No.5953887]

>>5953878
>hey 2D dude
>yeah?
>you know, the unit ball for the infinite norm in R^3?
>yeah?
>we call that a cube
>ok

[Anonymous No.5953890]

>>5953878
>still being retarded while ignoring the answers anons gave to you

[Anonymous No.5953892]

>>5953881
>Whatever your "definition" is, you can't change it halfway through.
This is the first time I've posted a definition here.

>First stop using words like "define" in a context where they don't belong.
What's wrong with the context? I want to know what "reasonable" means to you.

>Second the reason people reasonably believe in Riemann hypothesis is induction.
Right, and hasty generalisation is a fallacy.

>>5953884
It does agree with me. By the principle of excluded middle atheists believe in the non-existence of god(s).

>>5953886
>moving the goal
How?

>giving a link that disagrees with you
It doesn't.

>being wrong and trying to appear right although everyone on this thread is disagreeing with you
How am I wrong? Why are you appealing to the people?

[Anonymous No.5953893]

>>5953877
desperately trying to get this thread back on topic

[Anonymous No.5953894]

>>5953887
>2D understands this.

k

back to >>>/unicorns/ >>>/x/

[Anonymous No.5953897]

>>5953894
I understand balls in R^infinity, why can't you?

[Anonymous No.5953898]

>>5953894
>hey guys explain X to a 2D dude
>ok
>BUT YOU HAVE BEEN LE TRICKED 2D GUYS CAN'T UNDERSTAND THAT HAHAHA SO FUNNY TOTALLY NOT RETARDED

[Anonymous No.5953899]

>>5953894

[Anonymous No.5953902]

>>5953897
They're not hard to understand.

[Anonymous No.5953904]

>>5953897
What's the volume of a ball in R^infinity?

[Anonymous No.5953905]

U CANNOT KNOW NUTHIN
U CANNOT KNOW NUTHIN
U CANNOT KNOW NUTHIN
U CANNOT KNOW NUTHIN
U CANNOT KNOW NUTHIN
U CANNOT EVEN KNOW THAT U CANNOT KNOW NUTHIN
AM I BEING PROFOUND YET?!

G-GUISE?!

[Anonymous No.5953907]

>>5953869
>Atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.
Saying that belief is a fallacy falls under that definition.
#rekt

[Anonymous No.5953908]

>>5953892
>hasty generalisation is a fallacy.
Prove it.

[Anonymous No.5953909]

>>5953904
the same as ur mum

[Anonymous No.5953910]

>>5953905
>subjectivism
>serious philosophy

[Anonymous No.5953911]

>>5953908
>in b4 he replies "prove it's not"

[Anonymous No.5953917]

>>5950917

[Anonymous No.5953919]

>>5953907
I don't see how. Please explain why you think this.

>>5953908
It follows by definition of fallacy.

[Anonymous No.5953926]

Trying to get this thread back on topic...

[Anonymous No.5953928]

[Anonymous No.5953932]

>>5953928
Thanks man I lol'ed and it's nice to see this thread back on topic. I love these pictures.

[Anonymous No.5953943]

OC

[Anonymous No.5953953]

,more oc

[Anonymous No.5953958]

I guess I could deliver the punchline better.

[Anonymous No.5953973]

>>5953958
Should I feel bad about not getting it?

[Anonymous No.5953976]

>>5951023
Best one.
Jesus, this is hilarious.

[Anonymous No.5953977]

>>5953973
The telepathic monkeys thing is a common crackpot claim.
It's one of those memes that spread under the radar from word of mouth, and keep being reused and reused by mysticists, gurus, and all kind of people who want to sound interesting.
http://www.skepdic.com/monkey.html

[Anonymous No.5953988]

>>5953977
>http://www.skepdic.com/monkey.html

oh yeah, I heard this from my father, although he talked about energy transmission. same thing.

[Anonymous No.5954022]

>>5953928
> Neil "Before Me" Tyson

Well played.

[Anonymous No.5954025]

>>5954022
what is the joke there?

[Anonymous No.5954061]

>>5954025

Say "Neil before me" like 5 times.

Think of a pretentious character.

[Anonymous No.5954065]

>>5954025

[Anonymous No.5954091]

>>5953458
They did create the numerals that everyone in world sans a few countries uses.

[Anonymous No.5954177]

>>5953458
>that buttpain

India had 25% of the world's GDP in 1750.
The power series was defined there way before it was in the west.

Their astronomy was second to none.

Their philosophy and numeracy too. Base 2 aka Binary number systems were used to define musical scales, and you use indian numerals daily.

Their concepts of zero and infinity haven't really been superseded in 1500 years.

Indian universities were the best in the world 1200 years ago before being burnt down by muslims.

Stay mad.

[Anonymous No.5954249]

>>5953977
This should have been obvious because monkeys don't know mindfulness meditation, which is what enables telepathy.

[Anonymous No.5954328]

>>5954177
All that and they still cant figure out how toilets work or how to get the british monkeys off their back.

toplel

[Anonymous No.5954334]

I think atheists talk more about religion than theists do.

[Anonymous No.5954333]

>>5954328
Oh boy, are we doing this? really?

I hope we are.

ok, here goes

>you're a retard who doesn't understand the process of industrialisation and rapid population increase

Now you come back at me with some rape bullshit or pictures of dead bodies in the Ganges, then I'll respond.

[Anonymous No.5954358]

>>5954333
In india more than half the population goes outside to defecate in the open. The spread of dieases and infections is rampant. The gap between rich and poor escalated so much that trillions are spent on making films while people starve in the streets. The film industry brainwashes people and projects a kind of lifestyle that is impossible to achieve by the average person. Hence the resentment, anger and frustration that leads to crimes such as rape because dudes can't seem to emulate what they see in the bollywood movies.

The state of corruption in india is greater than even pakistan whereby innocent civilians in kashmir are murdered (see recent bbc reports) by indian army without any accountability. Recent case a couple of women and kids were shot by indian soldiers in a village, indian media did not report this and glossed over the implications.

hindu practices are barbaric and completely defy any kind of logic. Suttee is one example where the wife would be burned to death if her husband died. women in india are far more oppressed than any muslim country because here women don't feel threatened to board a bus or taxi fearing that they would get raped by sexually deprived curry faggots.

just the tip of the ice berg, now fuck off

[Anonymous No.5954377]

>>5954358
>In india more than half the population goes outside to defecate in the open. The spread of dieases and infections is rampant. The gap between rich and poor escalated so much that trillions are spent on making films while people starve in the streets.
Oh what a surprise, an industrialising nation is going through the same shit europe did when it industrialised. Must be because they are barbarians right?
Lets just ignore the fact that poverty is coming down, birth rates have been decreasing for over a decade and the mortality rate and life expectancy have been rising fairly sharply for longer shall we?

>The state of corruption in india is greater than even pakistan whereby innocent civilians in kashmir are murdered (see recent bbc reports) by indian army without any accountability. Recent case a couple of women and kids were shot by indian soldiers in a village, indian media did not report this and glossed over the implications.
Oh boy remember kids that this must also be completely unique to Indians right?! Lets just ignore the same thing happening due to Pakistani soldiers in Kashmir, American and NATO soldiers in Afghanistan, etc. Remember those Indian barbarians are at it on their own!

>hindu practices are barbaric and completely defy any kind of logic. Sut...
Remember everyone, Hinduism is a unified religion based on single faith and doctrine! Lets not for a moment think that practices vary from village to village nevermind state to state, lets also remind ourselves that Hinduism is totally the same as other 'religions' in terms of structure and such.

Remember that also, despite the rape statistics per capita being not particularly high, that you are more likely to be raped in india beacuse.... magic I guess.
Lets also pretend that in cases of rape in Islamic countries, that the men always get the blame, and never the women for being raped!


Please do carry on, I believe we are in total agreement here.

[Anonymous No.5954421]

>>5954377
>an industrialising nation is going through the same shit europe did

except europe got its shit together and had one chance to do so. as per your statement india was already an advanced nation in the 1700's so why are they so far behind? You forget corruption can contaiminate a society from its roots.

>this must also be completely unique to Indians right?

Beside Isarel and India, no other country has violated UN resolutions and deliberately suffocated the population of a region and prevent them from holding a plebiscite to decide their fate. Numerous countries have asked india to let kashmiris decide what they want. Not to mention Hari Sing the treacherous scum who backdates the agreement with india to stay in power and cheated pakistan's right to acesnsion of kashmir. indians are bloody hypocrites.

>Lets not for a moment think that practices vary from village to village nevermind state to state,

Culture vs. Religion, I raised this argument on numerous occassions, but somehow Muslims have to live with double standards. The backward cultural practices of the sub-continent have nothing do with all this shit right? Funny how people call Pakistan barbaric, they adopted the practices from hindus when they were part of india.

>despite the rape statistics per capita being not particularly high

everytime i visit cnn or bbs, there is a report of a new rape in india, now even foreigners are not being spared. hindus are deviants by nature, perverted and uncivilized.

>I believe we are in total agreement here

Wishful thinking

[Anonymous No.5954431]

>>5951039
I lold

[Anonymous No.5954458]

>>5954421
>your statement india was already an advanced nation in the 1700's
Never said anything of the sort, but lets pretend I did so that I can carry on reading your post.

>Beside Isarel and India, no other country has violated UN resolutions and deliberately suffocated the population of a region and prevent them from holding a plebiscite to decide their fate. Numerous countries have asked india to let kashmiris decide what they want. Not to mention Hari Sing the treacherous scum who backdates the agreement with india to stay in power and cheated pakistan's right to acesnsion of kashmir. indians are bloody hypocrites.
Kasmir is a complicated issue and I am in no position to defend any side in that conflict, India or Pakistan. The whole partition thing is a gigantic fucking mess even now after 70 years of independence.

>Culture vs. Religion, I raised this argument on numerous occassions, but somehow Muslims have to live with double standards. The backward cultural practices of the sub-continent have nothing do with all this shit right? Funny how people call Pakistan barbaric, they adopted the practices from hindus when they were part of india.
Did you just seriously suggest the dubious practices in islam come from India?

>everytime i visit cnn or bbs, there is a report of a new rape in india, now even foreigners are not being spared. hindus are deviants by nature, perverted and uncivilized.
Good to know you give into media bias and believe everything you read/see/hear verbatim. I agree with your clearly well thought out argument. Well done.

>Wishful thinking
It's called sarcasm you dolt.

[Anonymous No.5954553]

>>5953953
nice, top keek

[Anonymous No.5954943]

[Anonymous No.5955058]

>>5951026
not sure why i found that so funny

[Anonymous No.5955420]

>>5952508
Funny because the first computers were base 10

[Anonymous No.5955461]

>>5951026

this is gold

[Anonymous No.5955493]

[Anonymous No.5955628]

>>5953846
But then this means that.....there is a universe with a God! And if that god really is an "everything" he is in our Universe too.

[Anonymous No.5955634]

>>5955493
pro quality, start posting it in /pol/ and /x/

[Anonymous No.5955640]

[Anonymous No.5955912]

>>5952578
oh fuck can't stop laughing

[Anonymous No.5956046]

[Anonymous No.5956064]

>>5951029
somebody should put this on some pro-iraq/Afghan war christian fundamentalist fb a/c as they loathe Richard Dawkins and 9/1

[Anonymous No.5956065]

[Anonymous No.5956073]

>>5951112
>>5951121

[Anonymous No.5956080]

>>5953193
>"Willing people"
Suuuurrree

[Anonymous No.5956094]

>>5956073
made another one

[Anonymous No.5956145]

>>5956094

[Anonymous No.5956198]

>>5953928
>before me
had a good laugh, thanks

[Anonymous No.5956222]

>>5953385
this one's fucking great

[Anonymous No.5956224]

>>5955493
0/10

[Anonymous No.5956226]

>>5956073
>Smoke de grasse

lul

[Anonymous No.5956244]

[Anonymous No.5956290]

>>5951026
hes got a point tho

[Anonymous No.5956296]

[Anonymous No.5956388]

[Anonymous No.5957267]

>>5956145
excellent, top lel

[Anonymous No.5957358]

[Anonymous No.5957375]

>>5953926
lel

[Anonymous No.5957469]

>>5953917
>founder of physics
I giggled

[Anonymous No.5957623]

>>5957358
ahhahahahha. Lolzasaurus Rex

[Anonymous No.5959738]

>>5956046
kek