[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 766 KB, 2126x1397, 1375149919302.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5943333 No.5943333[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Im 19, I know calc I and II. I consider myself a genius. any others?

>> No.5943350

I'm just hijacking your thread because it's shitty anyway:

> However, they point out that Luce Irigaray might still be correct in asserting that E=mc2 is a "masculinist" equation, since "the social genealogy of a proposition has no logical bearing on its truth value." In other words, gender factors may influence which of many possible scientific truths are discovered. They also suggest that, in criticising Irigaray, Sokal and Bricmont sometimes go beyond their area of expertise in the sciences and simply express a differing position on gender politics.

Is there anything less relevant and important than philosophy?

>> No.5943359

>>5943350
arguably womens studies but one could argue that feminism is a philosophy

>> No.5943360

LOL

>> No.5943364

I'm 18 and I've known calc 3 since I was 16.....

>> No.5943365

Go learn some calc III.
Calc I and II are easy in comparison.

>> No.5943366

UNSOLVED PROBLEMS IN PHILOSOPHY:

>The Molyneux problem dates back to the following question posed by William Molyneux to John Locke in the 17th century: if a man born blind, and able to distinguish by touch between a cube and a globe, were made to see, could he now tell by sight which was the cube and which the globe, before he touched them?

What the fuck?

>Moore's Paradox
>Although this problem has received relatively little attention, it intrigued philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein when G. E. Moore presented it to the Moral Science Club at Cambridge. The statement "Albany is the capital of New York, but I don't believe it" is not necessarily false, but it seems to be unassertable.

Fuck off.

>What are numbers, sets, groups, points, etc.? Are they real objects or are they simply relationships that necessarily exist in all structures?
>Philosophy
>Not being behind two centuries

>> No.5943368

>>5943333
>blogging

>> No.5943378

br8b8m8

>> No.5943384

>>5943333
lol who photoshoped hitler into that picture

>> No.5943394

>>5943333
In Europe we start learning calculus at an average age of 16, and if you're doing igce maths you would start learning integration at 14. Silly American.

>> No.5943400

>>5943394
Thats not so impressive, I learned to integrate backwards before I even learned to integrate.

>> No.5943402

>>5943400
lol

>> No.5943420

Genius? I've seen 10 year old kids that already know calc 3, and by your age I'll easily also be at that level. You are just an ordinary smart guy for your age, and these could die at any moment and nobody would even notice.

>> No.5943438

>>5943384
what?

>> No.5943448

>>5943420
>smart guy
calc I & II is piss easy..

>> No.5943502

>>5943350
Early scientists were called natural philosophers.

>> No.5943522

>>5943333
I'm lvl 15 and I know it, its not as hard as /sci/ makes it to be