/sci/ - Science & Math

File: 30 KB, 380x299, 1373045971614.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Fri Jul 5 19:16:10 2013 No.5882169 [DELETED]

>tfw we live in the cold, lonely, outermost part of the Milky Way
>we will never know what it's like in the center
>the center, where the stars are clustered so close together, that if neighbouring stars both had planets you could be standing on one, and be able to see the other with the naked ey
>tfw there is probably a network of planets with intelligent life with their own civilisations, that have fought both interplanetary and extraplanetary wars in the past and have a seemingly infinite history
>humanity will never discover them and they will never know about us
>if they did, our form of communication, art, philosophy and culture and even appearance would be so alien to them as theirs would be to us

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 19:18:39 2013 No.5882171 >>5882169 eye* dammit, also to add to the last point, we would be so different that if they discovered earth or if we discovered them, it wouldnt even register if the other was an intelligent life form

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 19:19:09 2013 No.5882172 /sci/ is for science and math discussion, not for childish fantasy blogging. Please go be underaged somewhere else.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 19:19:40 2013 No.5882174 >tfw what is your point

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 19:22:40 2013 No.5882179 File: 159 KB, 964x959, radio in the solar system.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5882172 please proceed to explain how pic related has nothing to do with science. faggot

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 19:25:10 2013 No.5882182 >>5882179 What does that pic have to do with OP's childish ramblings? Nothing.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 19:27:09 2013 No.5882186 >>5882182 how is it childish? You have contributed nothing to this discussion and are saging every post, I believe you are the one being childish, faggot.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 19:29:09 2013 No.5882189 >>5882174 it's science philosophy, the point is to make you wander

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 19:30:09 2013 No.5882191 >>5882186 There is no discussion, thats his point.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 19:32:09 2013 No.5882193 What are the odds of intelligent life existing not only in the galaxy, but in the universe?

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 19:34:10 2013 No.5882196 >>5882186 What discussion? OP made an irrelevant blog post carrying no information other than revealing that his mental processes are on the level of a 5 year old.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 19:34:11 2013 No.5882197 >>5882193 We really can't possibly know, the rules of physics are probably even MORE different in another galaxy eg. gravity goes up. It would be unimaginable

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 19:36:39 2013 No.5882202 >>5882196 It's called having an interest in space and an imagination. and wanting to discuss the possibilities with knowledgeable people, what's wrong with that?

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 19:37:40 2013 No.5882205 >>5882196 >blog confirmed troll

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 19:37:40 2013 No.5882206 >>5882202 There is no discussion ITT. OP did neither present nor request any information pertaining to science or math.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 19:38:40 2013 No.5882210 >>5882205 Do you not understand what that word means?

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 19:40:41 2013 No.5882215 >>5882206 who said you have to provide information to discuss interesting things? stop saging, it's making you look childish

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 19:41:41 2013 No.5882218 >>5882215 You did neither present nor request information. Thus there is nothing to discuss. Please delete this thread and start a science or math thread instead.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 19:42:39 2013 No.5882223 >>5882218 he presented information about the milky way

Anonymous Fri Jul 5 19:43:40 2013 No.5882225
File: 4 KB, 87x224, TriciaTakanawa.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>5882169

Discussion of systems of stars that are more densely distributed: Science

Discussion of cultural drivers on different types of Solar Systems and Star Systems: Science

Speculation on WTF would happen if we discovered/encountered eachother: Science, but it would be more rigorous than what you present.

What O.P lacks in rigor is more than made up in thinking about something novel which few have thought about and fewer still have written.

Carry on O.P. or post a picture of your bellybutton, go to bed, and return with tales of more of your amazing dreams.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 19:44:39 2013 No.5882226 >>5882223 No, he did not. The fact that our galaxy is called "milky way" is known to every 5 year old and is not worth discussing. The rest of OP's post was retarded fantasy babble.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 19:45:40 2013 No.5882230 >>5882226 he gave a lot more than that.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 19:46:39 2013 No.5882233 >>5882230 Please point out where OP posted anything about science or math. I don't see it.

Anonymous Fri Jul 5 19:47:40 2013 No.5882236

>>5882233
>tfw we live in the cold, lonely, outermost part of the Milky Way
>we will never know what it's like in the center
>the center, where the stars are clustered so close together, that if neighbouring stars both had planets you could be standing on one, and be able to see the other with the naked ey
>tfw there is probably a network of planets with intelligent life with their own civilisations, that have fought both interplanetary and extraplanetary wars in the past and have a seemingly infinite history
>humanity will never discover them and they will never know about us
>if they did, our form of communication, art, philosophy and culture and even appearance would be so alien to them as theirs would be to us

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 19:48:10 2013 No.5882237 this is exactly the kind of stuff I think about often OP, I'm really glad you made this post. Ignore the autists, they can't dream

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 19:49:10 2013 No.5882239 >>5882236 Thanks for confirming that there is indeed no science or math in this thread. Would you please keep the underaged fantasy trash on >>>/b/ now?

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 19:51:10 2013 No.5882242 >>5882237 What are you doing on /sci/ if you're not interested in science and math but only come here for childish fantasy crap? /sci/ is not the right board for you.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 19:51:10 2013 No.5882243 >>5882239 >>5882169 has many science facts

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 19:53:10 2013 No.5882248 File: 133 KB, 935x606, 1162237037651.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >if neighbouring stars both had planets you could be standing on one, and be able to see the other with the naked eye

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 19:53:39 2013 No.5882249 >>5882239 It belongs on /sci/.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 19:54:40 2013 No.5882251 >>5882237 >>>/x/

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 19:54:40 2013 No.5882252 >>5882243 Please show me one "science fact" in OP. >>5882249 The only things that belong on /sci/ are science and math. Therefore this thread does not belong here.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 19:56:11 2013 No.5882253 >>5882252 we live in the cold, lonely, outermost part of the Milky Way

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 19:56:40 2013 No.5882255 >>5882233 Dude, you are totally pimping the travel on the Aspy Wagon Train. I'll pass.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 19:57:39 2013 No.5882256 >>5882253 This is well known to any preschooler and does not need to be discussed.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 19:58:10 2013 No.5882258 >>5882252 Why so butthurt? Were you brutally beaten by your parents when you read a fantasy book instead of studying?

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 19:58:39 2013 No.5882259 >>5882239 Don't bring it to /b/.....teach rigor, or find an exobiology or some such place for him. Sent him to /b/ and O.P. will be just another grease spot on a gore thread.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 19:58:39 2013 No.5882260 >>5882258 Why would I waste my time with anti-intellectual garbage instead of studying?

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 19:59:10 2013 No.5882265 >>5882256 But it still has science-related information, even if it's a well known fact; therefore, it belongs on /sci/.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 19:59:11 2013 No.5882261 >>5882256 no its not and you are biased

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 19:59:39 2013 No.5882264 >>5882259 /b/ is the random board. That's where OP belongs. His thread does not pertain to any other board's topic.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 20:00:10 2013 No.5882267 >>5882252 @hole, we can discuss theories, and that is science. We can treat specilation with scientific perspective and rigor. I sense envy that all your mathematical rigor cannot give birth an original idea potent enough to burst a paper bag.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 20:00:40 2013 No.5882268 >>5882264 science and math

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 20:01:40 2013 No.5882270 >>5882260 >anti-intellectual how pretentious why are you wasting your time here instead of doing research?

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 20:01:40 2013 No.5882271 File: 139 KB, 590x450, jean-luc-picard1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5882260 What would Picard say ? Don't. Leave Thread. Problem Solved. O.P. Engage !

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 20:02:40 2013 No.5882274 >>5882264 As a Physics Grad from Berkeley, I know what is of interest in a science milieu from what isn't. Because his presentation is not god-tier does not make it not-science. You are an ass, and that makes you not-science. go play somewhere else.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 20:02:40 2013 No.5882273 >>5882260 fedora/10 Would euphoric again

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 20:03:10 2013 No.5882276 >>5882261 It is. >>5882265 It does not allow for any kind of science or math discussion. >>5882267 > we can discuss theories I do not see any scientific theories ITT. Where are they?

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 20:04:10 2013 No.5882280 >>5882276 still wasting everyone's time including your own confirmed for Troll

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 20:04:40 2013 No.5882278 >>5882276 prove it

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 20:05:10 2013 No.5882282 >>5882276 >It does not allow for any kind of science or math discussion. >what is subjectivity

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 20:05:39 2013 No.5882283 >>5882268 Those are exactly what we're missing ITT. >>5882270 >implying I'm not multitasking >>5882271 Cinematic quotes belong on >>>/tv/

Anonymous Fri Jul 5 20:07:39 2013 No.5882287

>>5882274
Stop lying. If you don't even know the scientific method, you are definitely not a "physics grad".

>>5882280
OP is wasting time and space. One more reason for him to delete his thread.

>>5882282
>>what is subjectivity
Not science or math. Science and math are objective.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 20:07:39 2013 No.5882288 >>5882283 go back to /lit/ discuss Foucault or some post-modern shit you bore us, Trollikins.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 20:08:40 2013 No.5882290 >>5882283 We're not missing anything. OP posted science and math.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 20:09:39 2013 No.5882293 >>5882288 I do post on /lit/ but right now I'm on /sci/. On /sci/ I expect science and math discussion. >>5882290 He did not. Childish fantasy babble is neither science nor math.

Anonymous Fri Jul 5 20:09:39 2013 No.5882295
File: 8 KB, 212x234, TheDice.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>5882276

What you find in O.P.'s posting is Hypothesis based on some scientific observations and some speculation.

That is part of science.

you seem interested only in Hypotheses that are Guarenteed to yield IMMEDIATE non-falsifiable claims.

you also completely missed the value of O.P.'s contribution, got yourself sideways in the thread and are now trying to bully O.P. and anyone who values his contribution, rather than saying:

Um...sorry...I was a bit overdone..I APOLOGIZE...

so you have reverted to a one note johnny...not science.

pathetic waste of an education, as I presume you have earned your cred in other threads.

your problem here is not just lack of the full process of scientific endeavor from musing to hypothesis to theory to test to conclusion to 'back to square q'....your problem is purely characterological....your character.....

So Apologize and start again, or Aplologize and continue to bear the rejection your project

or just kindly leave.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 20:10:09 2013 No.5882297 >>5882283 Why can't you read a fantasy book and research at the same time?

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 20:11:10 2013 No.5882300 >>5882293 Yes he did and nothing like that was posted.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 20:11:39 2013 No.5882302 >>5882293 You lie. You Troll.

Anonymous Fri Jul 5 20:11:39 2013 No.5882303

>>5882295
>What you find in O.P.'s posting is Hypothesis based on some scientific observations and some speculation.

No, it is not. He did not present any hypothesis. Childish fantasy babble is not a scientific hypothesis. Please learn the scientific method. You're clearly underaged.

Anonymous Fri Jul 5 20:12:10 2013 No.5882304

>>5882287
>Not science or math. Science and math are objective.
What I meant is that your claim about the OP not being able arouse discussion is subjective. Now stop being so dogmatic about your opinions. Seriously, you're as bad as an overly-religious person.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 20:13:40 2013 No.5882305 >>5882297 Because anti-intellectualism is not compatible with science. >>5882300 His post does not pertain to science and math. >>5882302 >projection >>5882304 There is nothing dogmatic about science. Please learn the scientific method.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 20:14:09 2013 No.5882308 >>5882305 >His post does not pertain to science and math. Yes it does. Read it again.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 20:14:40 2013 No.5882307 >>5882305 Please fuck me ;-;

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 20:15:39 2013 No.5882309 >>5882305 What you're doing right now is "anti-intellectual"

Anonymous Fri Jul 5 20:16:39 2013 No.5882314
File: 35 KB, 584x329, ernest_scared_stupid_pdvd_482.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>5882303

One muses onself into an hypothesis. At least creative scientists do. As this topic is clearly interdisciplinary, the musing might be more than your tinker-toy brain can fathom, ergo it rejects.

the end result is the same...consciously or not you are a TROLL

now give it up and GET THE FUCK OFF THIS THREAD OR ANY THREAD WHERE YOU DECIDE YOU CANNOT BEHAVE !

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 20:17:10 2013 No.5882316 >>5882308 Please point out the science and math in his post. I don't see any.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 20:18:40 2013 No.5882317 we live in the safe(r) part of the galaxy. having a shit-ton of stars (powerful radiation emitters) all around you is a really terrible thing.

Anonymous Fri Jul 5 20:19:09 2013 No.5882318

>>5882314
Childish babble is not a scientific hypothesis. Please look up the scientific method. You should have learned it in middle school but apparently you didn't. Is it because you're underaged or because you spent your time with anti-intellectua fantasy trash instead of paying attention in your science class?

Anonymous Fri Jul 5 20:19:09 2013 No.5882321

>>5882316

Perhaps a Ban will teach you ?

MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODSMODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS

MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODSMODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS
MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODSMODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS
MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODSMODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS
MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODSMODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS
MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODSMODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS
MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODSMODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS MODS

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 20:19:09 2013 No.5882320 >>5882316 Astronomy is a /sci/ topic.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 20:20:39 2013 No.5882322 >>5882320 OP did not ask an astronomy question and he did not share astronomy related information.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 20:21:10 2013 No.5882323 >>5882318 Fucking lol'd 10/10 if troll 7/10 if copypasta

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 20:21:41 2013 No.5882324 >>5882321 The only one who deserves a ban is you.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 20:22:39 2013 No.5882326 >>5882322 Except he did post astronomy-related information. The study of galaxies is a part of astronomy and so is astrobiology.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 20:23:40 2013 No.5882327 >>5882326 He did neither request nor present any information about the study of galaxies.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 20:23:40 2013 No.5882328 >>5882324 So the Ad-Hominum finally rises to the surface ?

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 20:24:39 2013 No.5882329 >>5882327 Yes he did, read the OP.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 20:24:39 2013 No.5882330 File: 58 KB, 640x560, 1370434772141.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Man, it feels really good to be able to sleep again without eating certirizine like it is candy Regards, feelfrog

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 20:25:09 2013 No.5882331 >>5882328 Stating an observation is not an ad hominem. There cannot even be an ad hominem because there is no argument to refute. You are simply behaving very immaturely. >>5882329 I did and I don't see any. Please show it to me.

Anonymous Fri Jul 5 20:27:10 2013 No.5882332

>>5882331
Astronomy:
>we live in the cold, lonely, outermost part of the Milky Way

>we will never know what it's like in the center

>the stars are clustered so close together, that if neighbouring stars both had planets you could be standing on one, and be able to see the other with the naked eye

Astrobiology:
>there is probably a network of planets with intelligent life with their own civilisations, that have fought both interplanetary and extraplanetary wars in the past and have a seemingly infinite history

>humanity will never discover them and they will never know about us

>if they did, our form of communication, art, philosophy and culture and even appearance would be so alien to them as theirs would be to us

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 20:27:39 2013 No.5882333 >>5882324 there's no sense in you leaving now....why don't you hang around for a while and continue fencing with the folks who appreciate the O.P. while I whip away do my best to summon a mod ?

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 20:30:10 2013 No.5882334 Close planets mean more collisions means less life noob.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 20:30:40 2013 No.5882335 >>5882332 Clearly you do not know what astronomy is. You could start educating yourself by reading the wikipedia. And "astrobiology" is not even a real thing. >>5882333 This post does not make any sense.

Anonymous Fri Jul 5 20:34:09 2013 No.5882337

>>5882335
>Clearly you do not know what astronomy is.
I don't know much about it although thankfully OP's thread has helped me.

>You could start educating yourself by reading the wikipedia.
I prefer the OP as it is more concise and elucidative.

>And "astrobiology" is not even a real thing.
Yes it is. Look at NASA:
astrobiology.nasa.gov

Anonymous Fri Jul 5 20:35:43 2013 No.5882341

>>5882335

Made and makes plenty to me.
However, there is no way to summon a mod in the rules...they wander about as they will, anonymously.

So, unless they show up by chance, we are stuck here until someone has something better to do.

and I do.

That is ignore you and attempt to continue a discussion of O.P.'s topic.

If that cannot be resurrected, I shall bow to your destructive power.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 20:38:41 2013 No.5882350 >>5882337 Meh, I've seen better trolling from you. You're wasting your time. >>5882341 Why do you want to force off-topic nonsense on this board?

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 20:39:40 2013 No.5882351 When I try to report this thread, it doesn't tell me "you have already reported this post, blah blah", why is that?

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 20:40:11 2013 No.5882353 Does anybody have an idea of range of Interstellar distances based on distance from the Galactic Core. Could a star be visible in the day sky of a planet without being a member of a binary star system ?

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 20:40:40 2013 No.5882354 >>5882351 Do it again. It's a bug.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jul 5 20:41:10 2013 No.5882355 >>5882350 How am I trolling? How am I wasting my time if I am learning?

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]