[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 151 KB, 566x973, 1364027620760.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5768397 No.5768397 [Reply] [Original]

Is this statement true or false?

For all mathematical equations, involving any type of numbers. There is a picture behind each one.

>> No.5768492

>>5768397

I have no clue what any of that is in reference to, but I did find his studying of temporal illusions quite fascinating.

>> No.5768505

>>5768492
Hallo new friend!

>> No.5768516

It's just a bunch of equations you'd see in the first few weeks of Quantum Mechanics 1.

>> No.5768538

>>5768397
It's just a derivation of the time dependent Schrödinger wave equation, with the potential energy ignored. Nothing to get excited about.

>> No.5768543

>>5768505

I mean why would such a smart kid, working for DARPA, on such an amazing topic go on a killing spree.

Tis weird

>> No.5768656
File: 1.11 MB, 140x140, 1362968717438.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5768656

>>5768492
I really should of posted this pic.

>> No.5768669

>>5768656
It's funny because the Mandelbrot Set isn't self repeating

>> No.5768684

>>5768397
can soneone translate this into english or are you so fixed on being fucking special that you refuse to let someone else into your special pen?

>> No.5768825

>>5768656
>>5768669
wuth
I am wiht this guy>>5768684

>> No.5768866
File: 847 KB, 1920x1200, 48.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5768866

>>5768669
It's funny because you're wrong

>> No.5768903

>>5768866
Nope, they're not exactly the same as the main body.

>> No.5768911

>>5768903
Nope, it's still self-similar despite that fact

>> No.5768918

>>5768911
From wiki:
>The Mandelbrot set in general is not strictly self-similar but it is quasi-self-similar, as small slightly different versions of itself can be found at arbitrarily small scales.

>The Mandelbrot set in general is not strictly self-similar

>not strictly self-similar

>> No.5768921

lol at all of the aspies who can't into tacit meanings

OP is basically asking if there are any theorems with zero possible visual interpretation.

i would hazard a guess that everything in maths has some kind of convoluted visual basis to it.

>> No.5768927

>>5768918
> strictly self-similar
> same as self-similar
> strict inequality
> same as an inequality

>> No.5768930

>>5768918
Yeah, chaotic but still recursive shape.

>> No.5768957

>>5768927
But a strict inequality is a type of inequality, so if something isn't strictly self-similar, then it's not self similar.
>>5768930
Self-similarity requires it to contain exact copies of itself, which it does not. Being chaotic has nothing to do with it.

>> No.5768960

>>5768921
Isn't the equation representing the theorem a visual basis for it?

>> No.5768966
File: 64 KB, 470x425, 1356652752784.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5768966

>>5768957
>Self-similarity requires it to contain exact copies of itself

>> No.5768992

>>5768957
> But a strict inequality is a type of inequality, so if something isn't strictly self-similar, then it's not self similar.

dat logic fail

>> No.5769045

Why would you put a picture behind an equation? It's only going to make reading the equation difficult and could distract from what the equation states.Is a simple white background too BORING for your ADHD kids these days?