[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 156 KB, 496x445, 1364967432577.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5751928 No.5751928[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hBW4S9xcTOk

>> No.5751934

>"They say Stephen Hawking can think in three dimensions."

>"I think so, but I can think in four or five :D"

Insufferable cunt.

>> No.5751969

>>5751928
at least post his new shit news where they talk about how he has been hinted at for getting a nobel prize. I gues he is getting one in math nor his amazing calc 1 abilities.

>> No.5751973

Hey look.
It's that kid who hasn't done anything but is always getting attention.
It's that kid who has never done anything except talks about things like changing the world.
It's that kid that said he was going to disprove the big bang but failed miserably.

>> No.5751975

>>5751969
>Nobel Prize
>Math
Nope.

>> No.5751983

>>5751975
They're planning on making a new category just for him.
That's how special this kid is... and how hopelessly desperate the nobel prize comity is

>> No.5751990

>>5751928
> I wouldn't even recognize an equation for volume, would you?
> Not really
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hBW4S9xcTOk&t=4m45s

>> No.5752002

>>5751990
Holy shit. Is that 1st or 2nd grade stuff?

>> No.5752008
File: 73 KB, 524x468, 1360732255761.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5752008

>>5751983
They're thinking of renaming it to the Barnett-Nobel prize.

And try guessing who the next element is going to be named after.

>> No.5752010
File: 25 KB, 219x251, 1365038975301.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5752010

dude holy shit

>you can see anything in front of you, like a math equation... or pi!

>> No.5752021

>We make an enemy out of our only political ally Isreal.
I couldn't take any more.

>> No.5752031

>>5751934
>>"They say Stephen Hawking can think in three dimensions."

What does that even mean?

>> No.5752035

>>5752031
You'd know if you stopped thinking in 2D.

>> No.5752039

>prove the series is convergent

Wow, that's so hard. Kid's a total fuckin genius

>> No.5752044

>>5752039

> using the integral test for a non-monotonic sequence.

>> No.5752046

Around 3 minutes in I just cracked. I made it through the cringe-inducing intro well enough, I thought I could make it, but just... fuck, so painful.

>> No.5752051

>Glenn Beck
I don't follow US politics/etc, but this is the idiot everyone watches in your country 24/7?
Why do people like watching and respecting what these idiots say?

>> No.5752053

>>5751969
>calc 1
>integrals

>> No.5752054

>>5752044
I don't understand your point. That's retardedly easy.

>> No.5752059

>>5752053
>integral calculus
>not something you could teach a decent amount of 12 year olds through good teaching skills

>> No.5752057

>>5752051
Never even knew about that little prick till now. Anything on FOX I ignore into oblivion, as well as any other retarded, white-trash news stories.

>> No.5752065

>>5752053
Some schools have calculus as a year round course. Did integrals/series/diff in first calc course, vect/3d/etc in second.

>> No.5752071

>>5752051
>idiot
yes
>everyone watches in your country 24/7
no, his ratings have been falling ever since the economy started to pick up

>> No.5752100
File: 45 KB, 569x412, 1267980699834.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5752100

Check out the newest video on the mom's youtube:
/watch?v=2DUerSdSgG0

>1 minute in: Okay, look like a fun problem. Let's see what you got.
>6:55 : Discards the only nontrivial case (read: the only interesting case) as "badly behaved"
>mfw

>> No.5752131 [DELETED] 

>IQ of 170
Cool, Kid is clearly smart but why does this figure constantly change? Wasn't it 180?

>I can think in 4 or 5 dimensions.
So can everyone else. Think of a 3 dimensional object moving. Bam, Thats X,Y,Z and a time dimension.

5 dimensions? Lies!

This story keeps changing.

>Just began playing Beethoven.
Doubt it.

I have not found one OFFICIAL source telling me what degree he is doing and whether he has any qualifications.

>I have a photographic memory, Its like you can see things in front of you.

No. That isn't how a photographic memory works

>> No.5752149

>>5752059
I don't think you're wrong, but isn't calculus 1 differential, 2 is integral and 3 is multivariable?

I learnt the same shit as him when I was 14 too.

>> No.5752174

>>5752051
Glenn Beck lost his show on Fox back in 2011.

>> No.5752180

>>5752149
>there is only one education system
No.

>> No.5752193

He writes <span class="math">\int \sin(x) dx = \cos(x)[/spoiler]. No Nobel Prize for you!!

5:39 here

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DBkOlgJhXxY

>> No.5752197

>>5752053
>Not going through superior "Differentiation and Integration in one class" mantra.

Did you take a separate class for subtraction versus addition?

>> No.5752199

>>5752180
I thought the terms calculus 1, 2 and 3 are only used in the USA anyway, in other countries it's referred to as "year 1, 2 and 3 calculus"

At least I thought, (Canadian here).

>> No.5752201

>>5751934
And then he draws a tesseract. And then I kill myself.

>> No.5752210
File: 220 KB, 320x240, homer reaction.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5752210

>>5752193
>"Let me just check my work"
K

>> No.5752212

>>5752197
I agree with the notion that integrating and differentating should be taught together, but they usually aren't.

>> No.5752214

>>5752212
Why should they be taught together?

>> No.5752217

>>5752193
the indefintegral of sin(x) (with respect of x) is -cos(x), right? he just forget a -.

>> No.5752222

>>5752217
>Implying that "just forgetting a -" doesn't make the problem wrong

>> No.5752223

>>5752214
>muh fundamental theorem of calculus

>> No.5752233

>>5752217
nigga have you ever USED math in any practical way? The sign of your answer is a big fucking deal, especially in quantum physics, which is where this kid wants to be!

>> No.5752272
File: 71 KB, 2000x3208, Integral Sign.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5752272

>>5752193
>that integral sign
He doesn't deserve to win shit.

>> No.5752279

>>5752223
What is the fundamental theorem of calculus?

>> No.5752286

>>5752279
Come on man, it's fundamental!

>> No.5752288

>>5752272
How hard is it for people to write a proper integral sign? I don't understand why so many people write malformed S-shapes that look nothing like <span class="math">\int[/spoiler] and it really irritates me.

>> No.5752310
File: 20 KB, 450x370, 1354574292257.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5752310

>>5751928
>Couldn't understand E = mc^2 after studying relativity for 1.5 years
Are normal people really this stupid?

>> No.5752318

>>5752310
Normal people =/= Normal Americans

>> No.5752323

>>5752217
(pssst... we're being bitchy. that's the fun!)

>> No.5752327

>>5752318
Oh.

>> No.5752332

>>5752054
The integral test doesn't apply to non-monotonic sequences.

>> No.5752341

The intro killed me...

>> No.5752349

>>5752310
Only Americans..

I read general relativity when I was a teenager and I understood it. It wasn't when I was 10, but it was somewhere either in late school or early highschool.

>> No.5752360

>>5752349

Only a non-American wouldn't know the difference between special and general relativity.

>> No.5752364

>>5752131
>>Just began playing Beethoven.
>Doubt it.

there is playing and playing, m8. no need to get upset about this. he is far away from being mature enough to understand and interpret anything more advanced.

>> No.5752365

>>5752053
Yes, Calc I: Limits, derivatives and Integrals.
What shitty program does you university has?

>> No.5752382

>>5752360
Where does it say that he read special relativity in this interview? Maybe he read general relativity.

So, I don't get what's your point, sarcasm included. I mean, your point is not logical.

>> No.5752390

>>5752382

Huh? I responding to the idiot that claimed he read and understood general relativity BEFORE or in early high school.

>> No.5752396

>>5752390
How much math you need to know to understand general relativity?

Don't you just need to understand differential geometry?

>> No.5752407

>>5752396

Yep. And if you think someone who is barely in high school is understanding it well enough to also understand general relativity, then I have some snake oil I'd like to sell you. It's much more likely that he meant special relativity, which is much easier to understand. Hence my comment. Why is this so hard for you? My only guess is that you don't know shit about differential geometry.

>> No.5752452

the way that kid tried to proof the convergence says more than thousand words
>using integral test for non-monotone, non positive functions
>not realising, that the term under the sum is not even a null sequence
typical bruteforcing autist who'll never ammount to anything in his field

>> No.5752451

>>5752407
> Why is this so hard for you?

That was my first comment in this thread. I was just asking to learn more about general relativity.

And Iook differential geometry last semster.

>> No.5752471

Pretty cool to understand General Relativity equations 'n shit at age 10. That's quite a genius.

>> No.5752475

>>5752471
Also, he started playing Beethoven spontaneously at age 3-4.

>> No.5752487

>>5752039
But he does it at age 12. You seem to be missing something.

>> No.5752522
File: 33 KB, 348x383, 1362642504289.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5752522

>Glenn Beck gives his parents "Autism and the God Connection"
This shit is golden.

>> No.5752525

>>5752487
Being able to plug numbers into a formula doesn't have an age limit any higher than being able to write. Any plain old kid could do it.
The thing that would be special is being able to comprehend the ideas at an age of 12. He obviously doesn't since he applied a convergence test where it's invalid, and on a series that isn't convergent.

>> No.5752542

>and he just began playing Beethoven
Who the fuck is stupid enough to fall for that?

>> No.5752544

>>5752452
Yeah, when he said "I'll use the integral test" that really niggled me. That's where I had to close it.

>> No.5752546

>>5752279
The link between differentiating and integrating.

Basically the integral of f(x) between a to b is equal to the antiderivative, F(x), of b minus a.

<span class="math">\int_{a}^{b}[/spoiler]f(x)=F(a)-F(b)

>> No.5752549

>>5752546
=F(b)-F(a)

>> No.5752553

>>5752546
What if the anti-derivative doesn't exist?

>> No.5752563

>>5752561
>+C

Only high schoolers do this.

>> No.5752561

>>5752193
>that integral sign
>no +C
>writing on a fucking window

>> No.5752565

>>5752546
I think he really meant the first part,
<div class="math">\frac{d}{dx}\int_{a}^{x}f(x)dx=f(x)</div>

>> No.5752567

>>5752565
Bleh, fuck me. Dependent limits. Should be
<div class="math">\frac{d}{dx}\int_{a}^{x}f(t)dt=f(x)</div>

>> No.5752568

>>5752565
>>5752567
When does this apply?

>> No.5752577

>>5752568
When f(t) is continuous on the interval [a, b] and x is on [a, b], no?

>> No.5752586

Lasted less than 30 seconds, couldn't take the blatant propaganda. I'm sorry I can't enjoy raging over what the rest of you are all raging about.

>> No.5752587

>>5752568
its only the second fundamental theorem of calculus

>> No.5752592

>>5752587
I always thought that was the first part of the FTC

>> No.5752625

>>5752475
>BEETHOVEN AND MOZART IS GENIUSES IF MY KID CAN PLAY ANYTHING EVER WRITTEN BY THEM REGARDLESS OF WHAT IT IS AS LONG AS IT HAS THEIR NAME ATTACHED TO IT HE IS GENIUSES TOO
Which fucking piece did he play?

>> No.5752632

>>5752332
oh yeah lol

>> No.5752639

>>5752487
Also, it doesn't really warrant him being on television. It'll probably screw him up if anything.

>> No.5752693

>>5752625
Movement 1 of Moonlight probably.

>> No.5752728

ITT: jealousy

>> No.5752738

>>5752728
Pointing out faults in this kid is automatically jealousy, now?

>> No.5752746

I think he just crammed a lot of science information in his head but he cannot make real sense of none of it.

>> No.5752852

lmao

first time i'm here in like, 6 months and you guys are still on this.

>> No.5752863

>>5752852
This is actually the first major Barnett thread in a while.