[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 38 KB, 636x424, portal.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5699137 No.5699137[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

So /sci/, what would it be? A or B? Let's test your physics knowledge.

>> No.5699142

a if popsci such as this existed.

>> No.5699144

>>5699137

let's not get into this

anyone who says B is retarded. we've had this thread too many times, and everyone agrees it's A so lets just leave it there

>> No.5699145
File: 59 KB, 903x451, portal 2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5699145

>>5699137
It's sad that I have nothing better to do on a Saturday night than to make a detailed picture with a description for this thread...

None the less, check the picture for your answer. It explains it very well.

>> No.5699148

>>5699142
>>5699144
seems like it would be A to me

>> No.5699150

>>5699137
Do you know about the conservation of energy?

>> No.5699155

>>5699145

you probably didn't make this picture. It's been shown multiple times in this thread already. It's also wrong, and it's still not B

you have to use discrete math when dealing with portals

you can't be half in-half out of a portal it's either all in or all out

>> No.5699174

How about this OP.

Instead of creating a stupid argument thread you create a couple of portals in your backyard, run some experiments about 100 times, and post the results. You know, actual science.

>> No.5699246

>>5699137
This isn't a test of physics knowledge though. It's test of your ability to make shit up.

>> No.5699446
File: 303 KB, 400x300, portal.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5699446

B

If you think A then you think pic related

>> No.5699460

>>5699446

the only problem is that portals don't work discretely. you can't be half in half out

>> No.5699461

>>5699460

i mean continuously. they do work discretely

>> No.5699464

>>5699155
um no it isn't. Have you ever played the game? You can be half in and half out a portal. It happens all the time and its useful for solving some of the puzzles.

>> No.5699466

>>5699446
the problem with that is, portals cannot go on moving surfaces

>> No.5699467

>>5699460

Yes you can, play the game.

>>5699466

They can as of Portal 2. Go play Portal 2.

>> No.5699851

The answer is B.

>> No.5700149

>>5699467
No, they actually made the room move, not the portal.

>> No.5700177 [DELETED] 
File: 2 KB, 126x126, 1356059771316.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5700177

The answer is be

lrn2relativity

>> No.5700180
File: 2 KB, 126x126, 1356059771316.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5700180

The answer is B

lrn2relativity

>> No.5700181

>present magical apparatus
>demand physical description
Everyday is ruseday here

>> No.5700182
File: 47 KB, 408x410, efficient.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5700182

>> No.5700203

A if conservation of momentum
B if speed between reference frames is constant.

>> No.5700217

>>5699137
Scientifically, there are a fair few theories on a varying amount of wormhole ideas. The Einstein–Cartan–Sciama–Kibble theory of gravity allows for the formation of an Einstein-Rosen Bridge. Although, they suggest that all black holes are actually Einstein-Rosen bridges each containing an entirely new universe. This includes the theory that our universe is actually inside a black hole.
Since the only possible wormholes we know involve singularities, we cannot measure any of their properties or even make a guess as to what would happen to matter travelling into them.
Since singularities cannot be explained by any currently proven theory of gravity, this is a superfluous exersise of "who is the most retarded pseudo-nerd".
If you really want to try and understand how a wormhole works, educate yourself in theoretical physics to the highest level possible and come up with a decent theory of quantum gravity.

>> No.5700279

For those who think it is A, you seem to believe that the box would exit with zero velocity. Similarly, I assume you'd say that if the box were moving up with velocity v in the lab frame, it would exit with velocity v, perpendicular to the blue portal. But what if it were moving down at velocity -v, where -v is smaller in magnitude than the velocity of the orange portal (-V)? Would it exit at velocity -v? But that means it would exit by moving into the blue portal, which makes no sense.

>> No.5700294
File: 72 KB, 698x658, a_bwahaha.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5700294

This is unsolvable.
Y'alls posting in a troll thread.

>> No.5700647

>>5699155
Alright, if you chopped the cube into hundreds of little cubes then it would be B

>> No.5700659

With in game physics it would probably be A, although in game physics mandates that the situation is impossible anyway.

>> No.5700665

Portals can't be placed on moving objects.

>> No.5700683

imagine looking at it through the blue portal, the dark grey platform and the square would be hurtling towards you, so when it comes out it would shoot out, i can't see any reasoning why it wouldn't

>> No.5700691

A if it maintains its momentum relative to some magical preferred frame of reference
B if it maintains its momentum relative to the portals

In other words, B

>> No.5700703
File: 12 KB, 220x180, 1362614672928.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5700703

These threads every time
>People who know physics but are easily trolled
>High schoolers
>Trolls
>People who don't know physics
They are all here

>> No.5701136
File: 54 KB, 720x576, portalwhat.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5701136

A and B are correct.
The answer is A if you're watching the cube, or B if you're watching the portal. The yellow portal IS the same object as the blue portal. Moving the yellow portal relative to the cube, is exactly the same thing as moving the blue portal relative to the cube. You cannot move one half, without moving the other half. It doesn't break any law of physics or whatever, you just have to hold in your mind that there is zero distance between the in direction and out direction of each side of the hole, and there is nonzero distance between the in direction and the other in direction, same for the outs. You're not breaking anything because you're moving space which contains the cube through the portal. The sum of space is still the same. I'm fairly certain that Valve has accidentally something important.

>> No.5701149

Hey, everyone saying the answer is B, you can do this experiment at home. You know know how? Go grab a cup and a die, or whatever other object you can find, then slam the opening of the cup over the die or object, if you die or object hits the top of the cup,y ou are right, but since it wont, you are wrong and hopefully the glass from the shattered cup reinforces the fact that you are stupid.

The cube is not moving, so it will just fall out of the blue portal, it wont go shooting off into the distance, because no matter how fast you are moving the portal, the cube itself is not moving at all.