/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.5669580]

How will technology change in the next 100 years?

[Anonymous No.5669584]

smaller
faster
cheaper

[Anonymous No.5669586]

harder
better
faster
stronger

[Anonymous No.5669588]

I think we might see technologies that are literally a part of us, as opposed to something external

[Anonymous No.5669591]

It is difficult to make predictions that far into the future. Technology follows trends but trends change. Processor power using present electronic technology is limited by temperature among other things. At a certain point it will be at its limit the way a steam engine can only work so well. New technologies will come around, or they won't, can't say. In regards to other forms of technology there is going to be a shift away from fossil fuels out of necessity and there's a lot of potential for biotechnology to grow.

[Anonymous No.5669599]

we will create brains

like literal brains

biological computers in the quest for more processing power - we'll just build a more powerful brain.

brain transplants would be cool too

[Anonymous No.5669610]

>>5669599
Brains inside of brains. Brains made of brains. Zombie-immune brains.

[Anonymous No.5669822]

>>5669580
>>5669584
>>5669586
>>5669588
>>5669591
>>5669599
>>5669610

There you have it - in 100 years there will possibly be smaller faster cheaper harder better stronger internal zombie-immune brains.

>/sci/

[Anonymous No.5669825]

>>5669580
biochemical computers

[Anonymous No.5670416]

>>5669580
>How will we change technology in the next 100 years?
>How will technology change us in the next 100 years?
The relevant questions.

[Anonymous No.5670446]

computers will be twice as powerful, 10,000 times larger, and so expensive that only the five richest kings in Europe will own them

[Anonymous No.5670448]

We can't... Look at the 1950's they though we would be flying cars in 2000, yet we haven't.

Yes we are "slightly" better at predicting things now then 50 years ago. However we still don't know the true potential yet. For all we know Mass Effect was right and we discover Mass Effect fields and propel us 300 years into the future.

We just don't know OP.

[Anonymous No.5670480]

>>5670446
Computing power doubles every 2 years according to Moore's law.

[Anonymous No.5670485]

>>5670480
No it doesn't. Transistor density does.

[Anonymous No.5670502]

-power increase
-accessibility increases
-cost decreases

[Magnelec No.5671123]

>>5669580
Quantum computation.
Superposition=Awesomeness

[M No.5671257]

>>5670480
>>5670485
Moore's Law isn't predictive anymore in the sense that transistor density just happens to double every 2 years at no extra cost. Companies intentionally try to double the transistor density in order to keep in line with an earlier trend that was observed by Moore.

[Anonymous No.5671619]

>>5670446
>computers will be 100,000 times as powerful, 10,000 times larger, and so expensive that only the five richest kings in Europe will own them

sounds about right

[Anonymous No.5671624]

>>5669580
>How will technology change in the next 100 years?

Be the same as tech 10 years from now, probably slightly cheaper

[Anonymous No.5671657]

>>5671123
and yet oddly enough at the same time Superposition=Lameness.

[Anonymous No.5671674]

The knowlegde expansion of quantum physics will change technology drastically. Take a look a bioshock for instance. After 100 years who knows.

[Anonymous No.5671982]

>>5669825
lel

By the time we start phasing out our current computer tech it will be for quantum computers.

I know you're just trying to justify your outdated specialisation though. I feel bad for you ;_;
If you change now you can still put that bio major towards something useful

[Anonymous No.5671994]

>>5669599
You're saying they are made out of meat?