[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 1.29 MB, 1920x1200, forest for the trees.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5667772 No.5667772 [Reply] [Original]

I honestly believe (rightly or wrongly) that I have figured out how the Universe works all the way down to the core. In other words, the Theory of Everything solution. Furthermore, I believe that I am capable of explaining the solution in such a way that a highly qualified physicist could prove me one way or the other. So, can anyone tell me how to get in contact with a highly qualified physicist as soon as possible. ty

>> No.5667777

Does your theory explain qualia?

>> No.5667781
File: 17 KB, 300x246, tarantula.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5667781

>>5667772
a shameless self bump? yes it is, but this is serious. i am not joking. i have the solution.

>> No.5667784

If it's not based on some form of a strange loop, you don't know shit.

>> No.5667787

>>5667777

Qualia are sensory stimuli that register on you 'master control module' that no one else can directly perceive.

>> No.5667785

>>5667777
>>5667784
trust me. you are covered

>> No.5667786

>>5667772
>Has a theory of everything
>Has to ask how he can contact a "highly qualified physicist"
>Doesn't know any by name
>Doesn't attend a university where such physicists are his professors, able to assist him with this thesis

>> No.5667789

>>5667772
What are your qualifications OP?

>> No.5667790

>>5667787
are you 16

>> No.5667791

>>5667786
the solution needed IMAGINATION not math. The important thing that Einstein brought was imagination not math.

>> No.5667794

>>5667789
this isn't going to satisfy you, but my qualifications are, I figured out the one and only thing you really need to know which i got from studying Buddhism.

>> No.5667795

>>5667790

Why? Are you asserting that someone can in fact directly perceive your sensory stimuli? If so, how?

>> No.5667796

>Some sources have claimed that Gagarin commented during the flight, "I don't see any God up here." However, no such words appear in the verbatim record of his conversations with Earth-based stations during the spaceflight.[20] In a 2006 interview, Gagarin's friend Colonel Valentin Petrov stated that the cosmonaut never said such words, and that the quote originated from Nikita Khrushchev's speech at the plenum of the Central Committee of the CPSU about the state's anti-religion campaign, saying "Gagarin flew into space, but didn't see any god there."[21]

>> No.5667802

>>5667796
lol, the last line of greentext here almost explains the whole mystery. not that the man who said it would have known or understood that.

>> No.5667809

can or will no one help me? If somebody out there suspects that I may really know something (and I almost certainly have got the answer) then please be serious and help me out. It is THE SOLUTION!!! Offered up here and now.!!!

>> No.5667810

>>5667794
Do you have any proof? If its only one thing it should be relatively simple, but require a complex proof.

>> No.5667814

>>5667809
This is the opportunity that someone out there is looking for. To be a part of something REALLY BIG!!!!

>> No.5667815

>>5667810
BINGO BINGO BINGO!!! One thing, simple but requiring complex proof. YESSSSSSSSSSSS

>> No.5667816

>>5667815
Do you have any qualifications? do you know anyone?

>> No.5667827
File: 8 KB, 251x228, 1307331199352s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5667827

>>5667816
SELFFFFF BUMPPPP!!! Someone will see this thread and want to be a part of something. To have your name associated with The Theory of Everything!!! Someone serious please respond

>> No.5667829

This is a slow board OP. Relax. No rush eh?

>> No.5667832

Tell us it, what have you got to lose by posting it on this board? If it is really "the solution", then you shouldn't really be in it for the fame... You should be in it for the benefit of mankind. Somebody will stumble across it, 4chan is pretty well-known at this point.

>Just another dude on drugs who thinks he has it figured out.

>> No.5667835

>>5667795
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MElU0UW0V3Q
That's how.

>> No.5667834

You're lucky today, OP. I happen to be a highly qualified physicist. I watched Carl Sagan and Michio Kaku. That makes me an expert on astrology AND string theory. I'm more than happy to take your PhD level questions.

>> No.5667841

>>5667832
First not on drugs. Secondly, i cant help wanting the fame some. this is gonna make someone REALLY FAMOUS.

>> No.5667843

>>5667835

I see. So movies are real life now? Interesting.

>> No.5667852

>>5667841
also, had it not occured to you that someday someone is going to think they have it figured out and they will be right?

>> No.5667856

Get out of here with this bullshit. This is /sci/ not a delusions board.

Nobody else respond to this so this thread dies and this dude can go scribble more shit in his diary about how he discovered the meaning of the universe.

>> No.5667857

>>5667852

Indeed. But they won't post it on 4chan first.

>> No.5667859

>>5667857
This.

>> No.5667858

>>5667843
I don't understand your objection. Are you suggesting that video is fake?

>> No.5667865

>>5667857
okay, to this person or any other, simply if you can tell me on this board how to directly contact a specific physicist to help me prove or disprove what i have, i would appreciate it. nothing more nothing less. you don't have to believe do you? just some info.

>> No.5667862

>>5667791
>hurr einstein failed out of school, therefore my retardation is ok

>> No.5667872

>>5667865
I don't know man, just call up a research university and ask for the office hours of a professor you find on their website, then drive there and see the guy. Even though you're not a student you should still be able to arrange an appointment. What state do you live in?

>> No.5667873

>>5667865
>Go to nearest university
>Knock on physicists door
>Explain theory
>Done

I don't know why you need to get information from somebody on this board, there is no "Theory of Everything" qualified physicist. If there were, then we wouldn't need yours.

>> No.5667875

>>5667772
Did you know you aren't alone?
I see at least one of you every day on /sci/.
You have your own theory of the universe, and you think it will overturn everything.
Unfortunately, you need a qualified physicist because you have no grounding in mathematics or physics, so you need them to express your idea in their language.
You are deluded, and you think you are special.
I meet people like you all the time, who think they are chosen, who think they are better than everyone else.

>> No.5667878

>>5667772
You're very unlikely to find a qualified physicist at your disposal. Ask friends, find someone who studied physics, take a tour of CERN and talk to the staff there.
Your only other option would be to do what most scientists do: a peer-reviewed paper. Then submit it in any way you can. If even that fails, write an article in a local newspaper. Have to start somewhere.

>> No.5667877

Really... Hmm. If, just IF you are serious, try one of the faculty members from MIT Theoretical Physics. http://ctpweb.lns.mit.edu/personnel.html
Good ideas are money, so make a short presentation, timestamp the bastard and send it. Now, odds are against you, I mean come on, you are asking HERE? Still you never know. Good luck.

>> No.5667879

>>5667875
my friend, if you had it together like you want to present yourself, you would have better things to do than write that paragraph. period

>> No.5667880

>>5667858

Not at all. But are you suggesting that watching a video of a dream is the same experience as dreaming? If so, how can you tell what is actually happening and what you are dreaming?

>> No.5667890

>>5667879
I'm not him, but that argument makes no sense. That guy doesn't have to "have it together" to be a guy that sits on /sci/ and sees a plethora of self-proclaimed messiahs claim they have the answers to everything, even though they have no distinguishing features and no formal training or relation to learned individuals

>> No.5667894

>>5667877
THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU. not for the info, just for being civil and respectful, and I will take your advice. ty

>> No.5667899

>>5667890
i guess my point was that he clearly isn't doing anything MORE valuable with HIS time than at least trying to think of something useful to the world. perhaps i worded it unfairly and wrongly. sorry

>> No.5667897

>>5667890
And even if his identity was somehow related to the argument at all, which it is not, claiming an acclaimed professor has literally no time to type a paragraph is completely baseless and retarded

>> No.5667900

Drop the equations or get out of my face

>> No.5667902
File: 2 KB, 126x97, 1335064750868.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5667902

Why don't you use your theory of everything to find out how to contact a highly qualified physicist?

Oh that's right you CAN'T because GOD EXISTS

CHECKMAAAAATTTEEEEEE

>> No.5667905

>>5667899
Or, in other words, trying to thing of the answer to an important question (even if you can only get it wrong) is a more admirable use of time than ridiculing people for doing just that. the world needs answers far more than 4chan needs more assholes.

>> No.5667907

>>5667862
>einstein failed out of school
Except he didn't.

>> No.5667908

>>5667900
the equations are what i don't have.

>> No.5667911

>>5667902
After reading this, I have no choice but to accept Jesus Mohammed Christ as my lord and saviour.

>> No.5667915

Has your theory made any numerical predictions?

>> No.5667920

>>5667908
Then what DO you have?
Theories don't have vague descriptions of proprieties (opposite charges attract), but exact, numerical formulae (Coulomb's law).

>> No.5667922

>>5667915
not numerical predictions exactly, but it explains how gravity is just the weak looking end of the real forces at play. and it fully explains why light travels away from you a thte same speed no matter how fast you are travelling.

>> No.5667925

>>5667920
not vague. explains light's "movement". and it explains gravity. (hint:weak end of the stick)

>> No.5667936

>>5667922
But relativity already explains that.
>>5667925
Does it explain gravity as a quantum field theory? What happens when a black hole evaporates, for example?

>> No.5667942

>>5667856
>Diary
Dear Diary, today I have ultimately discovered the reasoning behind our universe and its existence. P.S. I sucked so much cock yesterday that everyone called me OP. P.P.S. I need more Dragon Dildos. P.P.P.S. I need more LSD for physics class.

>> No.5667951

>>5667936
relativity absolutely does NOT EXPLAIN that. relativity SAYS that light always travels away at same speed because time slows down. relativity doesn't explain how THAT happens and you know it. i can explain all of it. is there a way on this board i can get credit for what i reveal here?

>> No.5667980

>>5667951
nigga everyone here knows you're bullshitting.

>> No.5667995

>>5667951
You type like you're 15. People who know things don't talk like you do.

>> No.5668003

>>5667951
Use a tripcode and then search for your post in the archives as proof that you are the founder of your theory of everything (lolz)

captcha: icupngye tolling

>> No.5668016

ITT someone who can't into math but thinks he can do physics.

Without a formal education in maths there is no way you can even begin to comprehend the CURRENT state of physics let alone shape the future of the subject. It isn't just a tool for solving problems in some cases mathematical language is the only way to even describe the theories. Spouting shit like muh cosmic vibrations will get you no where these days as all the low hanging fruit have been grabbed. Einstein did well early on without knowledge of complicated maths because physics was still grounded in basic algebra at the time.

This is not the case now of days.

>> No.5668021

>>5667791
lol you are retarded

>> No.5668020

Why doesn't your "theory of everything" tell you where to find a "highly qualified physicist"?

checkmate

>> No.5668032
File: 61 KB, 433x433, bazinga.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5668032

With my superior genius intelligence I came up with my own theory of everything when I was 5 years old. My theory did not only predict the creation of your theory but it also explains why you're wrong.

>> No.5668084

>>5667951
...do you even know what relativity says, or have you just read some pop-science book that gives a vague, intuitive description? Mathematics is the language of physics; if you don't have precise mathematical equations, all you have are speculative ramblings, not a theory.

Self-reflection is an important part of Buddhism, is it not? Perhaps you should reflect on where you stand on the crackpot index:
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/crackpot.html

I expect the outcome won't be too favorable. Also, unless you have precise equations and concrete, testable predictions, don't waste your time contacting MIT physics faculty or something; they get tons of messages from crackpots claiming to have discovered the Theory of Everything, and yours won't get any more attention than the rest of them.

>> No.5668086 [DELETED] 

>>5668084
the only thing you should worry about is why you get angry about things that have nothing to do with you. are you actually crying with fury over there cuz it seems like you are. huh, cryin yet sally... cryin yet susan... huh

>> No.5668090

>>5668084
>http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/crackpot.html

the perfect guide for trolling /sci/

>> No.5668101
File: 24 KB, 450x485, sage.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5668101

>>5668086
Wait, your response is literally "u mad"? Okay, I'm calling troll. There's no way you're serious. And if you are serious, that way of responding to criticism won't do you any favors when it comes to being taken seriously.

Sage thyme.

>> No.5668114

>>5668101
okay, i admit that was low of me. but i am just amzaed at the number of people who launch posts just to express how mad your post makes them. the only more wasteful use of energy than anger is anger plus typing. see what i mean?

>> No.5668118

>>5668115
i would exchange info with you if you are serious, absolutely.

>> No.5668115

I know someone with a doctorate in physics, gimme the theory and it will be published.

>> No.5668119

>>5668114
Nobody in this thread is getting "angry" at you. We're engaging in discussion and most of the people here are actually refuting your points

>> No.5668124

>>5668118
Send an email to this address. For the record, I don't believe you have anything resembling a theory, but if the potential gains of believing you far outway the potential losses.

>> No.5668130

>>5668119
no one has "refuted" anything since i have not, as has been rightfully pointed out, given anything concrete. so they could not refute anything at all. also, some of these responses have anger behind them and you know it. not yours necessarily, but some.

>> No.5668131

>>5668124
ummmmmmm, what address. need help.

>> No.5668134

>>5668133
to what address?

>> No.5668136

>>5668131
kljjmele@sharklasers.com

>> No.5668137

I'm a highly qualified physicist. Post thesis in thread.

>> No.5668133

OP I don't have mush longer send the email.

>> No.5668157

OP I haven't received the email.

>> No.5668165

>>5668130
You said:
>the equations are what i don't have.
That means you don't have a theory. Like I said, mathematics is the language of physics.

There is no anger behind what I'm saying; I just want to convey the facts of the matter so you know what to expect. If it doesn't have mathematical equations to back it up, it's not physics, and no physicist will bother paying it any mind.

>> No.5668171

>>5668165
alright, i respect this, and suppose it is true probably. that is too bad. i really believe i have some things here that would set ball in motion without any math from me. but probably wrong. that is true

>> No.5668177

>>5668171
post what you have in the thread, if it is worth anything maybe we can improve on it, it doesnt matter who exactly came up with everything, i would just like to see redditfaggots when 4chan turns out to be the intellectual ones

>> No.5668180

>>5668177
i desperately want to reveal what i have (ego) but am afraid i wont get proper credit if it just starts out here and snowballs. (ego) again

>> No.5668181

>>5668180
Do
>>5668003

>> No.5668182

>>5668180
send me the theory then, and i will have it published and your name will be given as the guy who got the ball rolling (requires you to email me your theory and name)

>> No.5668186

OP just shoot yourself and take your theory with you. Clearly this world doesn't deserve the truth.

>> No.5668191

>>5668180
But if you have some vague, 10-a-penny idea, then the credit really belongs to the person who manages to turn it into something mathematically rigorous. The idea 'snowballing' is just another way of saying 'the vast majority of the work will be done by someone else'.
you said that you think gravity is the weak side of the 'real forces'. That sounds like a typically unification; all the forces of nature are a single force at high energies. This idea has existed for a long time; the trouble is turning it into a mathematically sound theory. You have to explain - in great detail - HOW all the forces are in fact different aspects of the same force. THAT'S the challenge, not the basic idea of unification.

>> No.5668200

>>5668191
okay, this sounds right, and reasonable. i respect that you know something of what you are talking about and are not just being smartass. just wanted to say that. it bears pointing out when people are civil on here.

>> No.5668207

>people taking OP seriously

>> No.5668221

>>5668200
I'd still like to hear about your theory, if you want to post it. Perhaps we could show you similar ideas, and their difficulties.
The way people understand physics and theories about it is of great interest.

>> No.5668234

cocaine is bad for you.

Tell us your theory (or at least a general idea).

>> No.5668259

Have you any experimental evidence to support your hypothesis?