[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 293 KB, 661x716, 1341785139679.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5658591 No.5658591 [Reply] [Original]

Where do things like Mathematics and Computer Science fit on a "knowledge spectrum"?

There is stuff like science: Physics, Chemistry , Biology, etc.(Theories based on empirical observation)
There is pseudoscience: Psychology, Sociology, economics, etc.(No theories, just empirical observations and lots of opinions)
There is Philosophy which would rather use arguments to prove a point than evidence.(Says a lot about it)

Where does Maths go?

>> No.5658592

>>5658591
math is the language of certainty

>> No.5658600

>>5658591
>There is pseudoscience: Psychology, Sociology, economics, etc.(No theories, just empirical observations and lots of opinions)
But that's wrong. Pseudoscience is sticking to a hypothesis that has been disproved many times over, and refusing to do away with it. The sciences you listed are (to some extent) social sciences, not pseudoscience. There is a great deal of theory that is based on empirical observation in all of these fields.

>> No.5659739
File: 90 KB, 1022x420, Batman-Begins-Scarecrow-Screencaps-dr-jonathan-crane-scarecrow-13222083-1022-420.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5659739

>>5658591

You don't have a shred of knowledge about what psychology actually is, do you?

>> No.5659746

>>5658592
I like how you put this, in a world where everything we see may be a lie it's nice to remember 4+4=8, it is simply fact.

>> No.5659773

>>5658591
psychology, sociology, economics, they're Social Science, not pseudoscience. Pseudoscience isn't science, they're joke.

Math & CS are Formal Science: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formal_science

>> No.5659777

>>5658591

There is no "knowledge spectrum", stop trying to hammer real things into artificial constructs.

>> No.5659778

>>5659777
science is an artificial construct, afterall

>> No.5659887

>>5658592
>>5659773
This. Maths is so much simpler than real life.
>2013
>Not pursuing a PhD in Mathematics
But yeah, the cartoon made me laugh OP. However, I would question such autistic categorisations. People have already pointed out the questionable definition of pseudoscieence, and I would question the snide "Says a lot about it" also.

>> No.5659943

its like this OP:


$logic array (
math=>array(science=>array(physics, chemistry, biology),
philosophy=>array(pseudoscience=>array(psych, soc, econ),
CompSci=>CompSci,
)

>> No.5659986
File: 62 KB, 500x888, imgbc.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5659986

>>5658591
>Biology
>Theories based on empirical observation
not
>No theories, just empirical observations and lots of opinions

0/10

>> No.5659997

>>5659986
Insecure