Discuss.

[Anonymous No.5653981]

Anonymous 04/01/13(Mon)15:40 No.5653906

>>5653853 (OP)
You guys keep replying to this shit?
Answer is 18.

6/2(1+2)
Factorize
2(3/1(1+2))
Parenthesis first
2(3/1*3)
now division
2(3*3)
Now multiply it.
2(9)
Now let's get rid of the other parenthesis.
18.
Q.E.D

>>5653906
I think you mean
5.9~4/1.9~8(0.99~+1.9~8)
Factorize
1.9~2({3/0}/{1/0}(0.99~+1.9~8))
<Parenthesis first>
1.9~2({3*0}/{1*0}*1.9~7)
Now division (orly*@thisforthatalgorithm)
1.9~2({0.0.3}*1.9~7)
Now Multiply (orly/@thisforthatalgorithm)
1.9~2(1.9~2333~)
Now lets get rid of those pesky perenthi
3.9~3033~

Q.E.D

>now this is MATH

[Anonymous No.5653985]

Die.

[Anonymous No.5653993]

>>5653981

[Anonymous No.5653991]

>>5653985
you mad at spending so much time on baby school math?

[Anonymous No.5654023]

>>5653991
Yeah, that's exactly the reason i think this thread is bullshit. The math is too damn hard.
Fucking moron.

[Anonymous No.5654170]

>>5654023

[Anonymous No.5654619]

>>5653981
>ITT OP trying to impress with quasi quantum singularity gibberesh
>ITT we discuss our fastidious loving of our own ignorances, I mean we care for them we tend to them we're for ever dwarfed by them at their expanding rate, we can't even compete with their interations, the possibility of a word with uncontrollable logical sequence do to it's nature do to it's ever expanse, that it's ralational emprisement outweights our recognition of it's comprisement, and how that relates to us not wanting to quit science for good

[Anonymous No.5655237]

>>5653981
>tfw I decide to go further than /sci/'s front page

[Anonymous No.5655241]

>>5653981

>6/2(1+2)
>2(3/1(1+2)

nope.png

[Anonymous No.5656755]

>>5653981
Bump, what are your opinions of the actual state of math /sci/?

>picture unrelated