[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 214 KB, 500x350, 64-equals-65.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5601610 No.5601610 [Reply] [Original]

What's actually happening in this .gif?
64=65?

>> No.5601622

The triangles don't actually fit together like that, there is a small amount of space between them

>> No.5601629

They don't fit together perfectly.

>> No.5601642

But would the empty space still be equal to a full square? I'm trying to see where the space would be, but I can't really see it.

>> No.5601667
File: 43 KB, 624x588, 1253825804386.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5601667

Here's the solution.

>> No.5601684
File: 638 KB, 624x588, gifed.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5601684

same concept

>> No.5601708

>>5601642
the slope of the triangles is 8/3
the slope of the trapezoids is 5/2
since 5/2 is not equal to 8/3 the slopes don't mesh

yes, the gap is equal to a whole square, it is spread out over the entire long diagonal so the thickness of the lines partially masks it

>> No.5602274

What was Einstein doing with this

>> No.5602287

>>5601667
>>5601684
FUKKEN REKKED

>> No.5602293

>>5601610
Neat.

>> No.5602321

>>5601684
This is pretty simple to prove if you use vectors instead of just giving it a quick glance.

>> No.5602330

>>5601610
The orange figure is 2 pixel taller.