[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 15 KB, 225x220, 1356117541196.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5557963 No.5557963 [Reply] [Original]

Hey /sci/. A friend of mine recently sent me this.

http://www.robertlanzabiocentrism.com/is-death-an-illusion-evidence-suggests-death-isnt-the-end/

I really don't believe it, and the author seems to forget he's trying to prove the existence of an afterlife like 20% into the goddamn thing, but what does /sci/ think of it? Is it just complete pseudo-science bullshit?

Pic unrelated.

>> No.5557986

>>5557963

>infantile cartoon

>> No.5557989
File: 151 KB, 290x290, magicman.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5557989

>biocentrism

>> No.5557992

>>5557989
See >>5557986

>> No.5558001

Why would we care? Evidence doesn't suggest. Evidence is evidence. You can use any kind of evidence to imply whatever you want through logical (like deduction) or illogical (like induction) arguments.

But, nevertheless, nature behaves as it behaves, and it doesn't matter if it behaves 'logically' or 'causally' or not. Nature can do whatever does, it's not restrained by what we think about that... and if it IS restrained, wow, that would be really paranormal -but I wouldn't trust it-

>> No.5558032

>>5557963
>using two slit experiment
>thinking observing means actually watching it