Refining sticky thread

[/sci/ guide editor W No.5543606]

Suggest anything

[/sci/ guide editor W !CW/9eQBZSI No.5543629]

Or ask anything

[Anonymous No.5543632]

>>5543606
Cosmopoligammy and it's place in the fashion world

[/sci/ guide editor W !CW/9eQBZSI No.5543638]

>>5543632
Technically that's in the /fa/ggot store here

https://sites.google.com/site/scienceandmathguide/other/assimilation

[Anonymous No.5543662]

Fix the comment box. I loved to spam that.

[Anonymous No.5543675]

>>5543638
ALRIGHT!

Well then in that case might I suggest taxidermy instructions, you never can be to prepared

[Anonymous No.5543706]

Copy the /sci/ Latex tutorial link from the wiki and into the sticky.
(And say something like READ THIS BEFORE POSTING HEADACHE INDUCING FORMULAS)

Too many people not taking the easy effort to just figure out how to put their equation in easy to read terms

[/sci/ guide editor W !CW/9eQBZSI No.5543715]

>>5543662
Oh shit I broke it

>>5543706
That's something for the mod to do

[Anonymous No.5543719]

>>5543606
bring back the putnam threads to help set the tone of the board.

[/sci/ guide editor W !CW/9eQBZSI No.5543747]

>>5543719
Some random anon did that.

>>5543675
Okay

I'll have the other guy fix the chat. And yeah, there's only two of us working on it now...

[Anonymous No.5543766]

>>5543719

You could always look for a putnam question and just post it. /sci/ is a slow board, even if just a couple of people are there it will be visible.

[Anonymous No.5543767]

>>5543719
>>>/sci/putnam
Anyone can post the threads.

[Anonymous No.5543785]

>>5543767 >>>/sci/putnam

What is happening?

>>>/sci/edgy

[/sci/ guide editor W !CW/9eQBZSI No.5543811]

Just reminding that this is here https://sites.google.com/site/scienceandmathguide/contribute/suggestions

I'm gonna be off improving and looking for things

[/sci/ guide editor W !CW/9eQBZSI No.5543819]

Listing all these books in bullet form

[/sci/ guide editor W !CW/9eQBZSI No.5543896]

ignore this post

[Anonymous No.5543900]

>>5543819
Just a reminder that this guide is incorrect and shitty.

[/sci/ guide editor W !CW/9eQBZSI No.5543907]

>>5543900
Okay

I just added that it covers more than 1 year of material if that helps

[Anonymous No.5543923]

>>5543907
That's an improvement, but also it recommends spending about 4-5 months on shitty engineering math, which is retarded if your goal is to go into real math. If you're interested in math, you should not be getting your main linear algebra knowledge from Strang, for example. Also, there's no reason to recommend big Rudin unless the person is considering going into analysis. At that level, it would be far better to just experience different areas. The author of that seems to think math is nothing but analysis.

[Anonymous No.5543937]

>>5543923
Also, please remove the all caps. It's aggravating as fuck.

[/sci/ guide editor W !CW/9eQBZSI No.5543960]

>>5543923
Well, it is in the maths section

>>5543937
I'm gonna have to screenshot new posts for that.

[/sci/ guide editor W !CW/9eQBZSI No.5543980]

>https://sites.google.com/site/scienceandmathguide/subjects/mathematics

>Guide for everyone else:

>Do in order single variable calculus > linear algebra and multivariable calculus > differential equations
>Abstract algebra and complex analysis (and analysis in general) you don't need unless you know what you are doing.

mfw

[Anonymous No.5543982]

just read everything here: http://mathdl.maa.org/mathDL/19/?nodeId=959&pa=content&sa=viewDocument

[/sci/ guide editor W !CW/9eQBZSI No.5543992]

>>5543982
>Access to the current BLL is done through the MAA Reviews database and therefore requires either membership in MAA or a subscription.

What an error. Should say "access to the entirety of the current BLL"

Good source. Adding to maths section under lists and collections.

[Anonymous No.5544000]

>>5543980
>infantile cartoon

[/sci/ guide editor W !CW/9eQBZSI No.5544011]

>>5544000
pretty arousing though

[Anonymous No.5544022]

>>5543980
Again, Big Rudin is not even close to core undergrad material, and isn't even the best book for its subject.

[/sci/ guide editor W !CW/9eQBZSI No.5544029]

>>5544022
>Walter Rudin, Real and Complex Analysis [a] (Papa Rudin is not even close to core undergrad material, and isn't even the best book for its subject)

[Anonymous No.5544359]

The sticky has this "/sci/ undersea reasearch" section which is nothing but a kid's fantasy drawings. You should remove it. It makes the sticky look even more untrustworthy than it already is. Also please remove the sci fi and atheism nonsense from recommended reading and video sections. This isn't r<span class="math">[/spoiler]eddit and such infantile garbage inofficially confirms that cancer is welcome on this board.

[Anonymous No.5544374]

>>5544359
>atheism is infantile garbage
Your comment is totally fair and un-opinionated and deserves a pat on the head.

[Anonymous No.5544379]

>>5544022
>>5544029
I thought Papa Rudin meant 'Functional Analysis.' Or are you using 'big' as distinct from 'papa?'

[Anonymous No.5544380]

>>5544374
Defining your person by your lack of belief is immature teenager garbage. Do you see people defining themselves as not stamp collectors?

[Anonymous No.5544384]

>>5544380
>implying such trivialities as stamp collecting are similar to religious belief

[Anonymous No.5544391]

>>5544379
I assumed 'baby' was "Principles of Analysis" and 'papa' was "Real and Complex Analysis".

It wouldn't be the only ambiguity in that pic.

[Anonymous No.5544387]

>>5544359

Wow the lengths you people will go to to distance yourselves from r/atheism. Just because reddot id filled with retards doenst means you have to go to church every sunday just to not be associated with them.

[Anonymous No.5544400]

>>5544380
No, but we do categorize people as 'not annoying anal retentive assholes', which doesn't include you, obviously.

Also, NASA and almost every other science-producing institute uses 'Artist's impression of...'-pictures. I guess you think they're childish garbage also.

Of all the people I've personally known, your posts most resemble the inane shit that one small-business-owner used to spout(smiling isn't professional! don't contradict me even if I'm wrong! no laughing!!!!) before he ran his business down.

Relax a little, you're gonna blow a vein in your brain as soon as you get a real job and see the ancient dilbert cartoons pasted on the walls.

[Anonymous No.5544792]

>>5544359
Underwater research station = Fine where it is. When everyone grows up it can be reopened with real science added to it.

Atheism bullshit is not welcome.

Separate sci-fi should be ok because sci-fi is awesome.

[Anonymous No.5544797]

>>5544000 >infantile cartoon

Picture related

[/sci/ guide editor W !CW/9eQBZSI No.5546930]

>>5544379
I thought Papa and Big Rudin were the same

[Anonymous No.5546932]

>>5546930
They are.

[/sci/ guide editor W !CW/9eQBZSI No.5546946]

>>5546932
What is this >>5544379
guy talking about then?

[Anonymous No.5547833]

Please remove the sticky. It sucks. It's full of useless shit and nobody is using it anyway. It doesn't stop newfags from shitposting and it doesn't help anyone.