/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.5469489]

What does /sci/ think of this?

"Only in the realm of mathematics can you understand Muad'Dib's precise view of the future. Thus: first, we postulate any number of point-dimensions in space. (This is the classic n-fold extended aggregate of n dimensions.) With this framework, Time as commonly understood becomes an aggregate of one-dimensional properties. Applying this to the Muad'Dib phenomenon, we find that we either are confronted by new properties of Time or (by reduction through infinity calculus) we are dealing with separate systems which contain n body properties. For Muad'Dib, we assume the latter. As demonstrated by the reduction, the point dimensions of the n-fold can only have separate existence within different frameworks of Time. Separate dimensions of Time are thus demonstrated to coexist. This being the inescapable case, Muad'Dib's predictions required that he perceive the n-fold not as extended aggregate but as an operation within a single framework. In effect, he froze his universe into that one framework which was his view of Time."

[Anonymous No.5469493]

I think she should so some spice and see laser Floyd.

[Anonymous No.5469518]

>>5469489
Yes but how can that be applied when it is as said the 'Muadib Phenomenon' theres even a third basis of construction that gives them all premise of utility to the singularity- which defeats the seperate dimension of time as it is not behaving as a linear subject(*), as to say that between the aggregate and the subject that there is an unconsidered operation
Whats being said there is that infinity^infinity
But what I'm saying is that before they can even recognize its even intrinsic self as such does it(... why the fuck are powers written like that? /sci/ help?) need to recognize there is an expanse beyond it as to say that even before it is infinity it is percieving infinity and does the external boundaries comply- which is the question of how that phenomina is occuring, is it breaking a path into said objective external or is it behaving as the external
>implying Muadib is the force progressing existance
But now we know that cant be true because animalia and reptiles history & shiz
So yes, it is like freezing the framework to that, but just as so, that the in question operation is not foolproof<-being the ideal term
>*?nextpost
+1 on taste btw OP

[Anonymous No.5469537]

So I log on to 4chan's front page and see a recent image of what reminded me of Dune. Come into this thread, and I could not understand what the hells going on. So congratulations.

[Anonymous No.5469553]

what about siona?

[Anonymous No.5469564]

Would be more compelling if Muad'Dib hadn't gone off the deep end and without the god-emperor's Golden Way.

[Anonymous No.5469579]

>>5469489

>first, we postulate any number of point-dimensions in space. (This is the classic n-fold extended aggregate of n dimensions.) With this framework, Time as commonly understood becomes an aggregate of one-dimensional properties.

Translation: Disregarding all 20th century physics, and assuming space is granular, it is possible to describe time as a group of n lines extending from every point in the simultaneous present, where n is the number of space quanta in the universe.

>Applying this to the Muad'Dib phenomenon, we find that we either are confronted by new properties of Time or

I've got no idea whether what I'm about to say makes any sense, but...

> (by reduction through infinity calculus) we are dealing with separate systems which contain n body properties. As demonstrated by the reduction, the point dimensions of the n-fold can only have separate existence within different frameworks of Time. Separate dimensions of Time are thus demonstrated to coexist.

...but with a little bit of bullshit you can "prove" that all the above timelines can't be parallel. Therefore there must be multiple dimensions of time.

>This being the inescapable case, Muad'Dib's predictions required that he perceive the n-fold not as extended aggregate but as an operation within a single framework. In effect, he froze his universe into that one framework which was his view of Time."

Through magic, Muad'dib makes all the lines parallel to his own timeline. Since I don't know what compatibilism is, this means that the chronologically first person to see into the future locks that future into place, taking away free will.

---

tl;dr A poor understanding of linear algebra, a complete rejection of 21st century physics, and a naive view of free will combine to describe free will as a first-come-first-served voluntarily applied projection operator of a multiple-dimensional time dimension onto a single-dimensional actually experienced future.

[Anonymous No.5470671]

>>5469489
>>5469518
>*
>>5469579
A: Why would you ever consider time space linear when its obviously of great many intervals from potentially infinite directions, as 20th century physics says(are you retarded btw?) as to say that n-line is not correspondent with the full existant inquestion but the moment that is being transcribed to the beholder and as such are they perceiving their dimension in time as it can only ever be said to be as such, its not a matter of first come first serve its a matter of do you even project, bro

>>5469518
>*
It can be picture like a bunch of layered balls, each having the phenomina and each projecting to the next moment (which for depictions sake is internal) and where they cross is where the view is disrupted by another occurant and if only one can anticipate those other views is the formula undisturbed and left as its former definition, as I may point out also noted in the book rarely with the Bene Gesserit, and there scheming

ofc whats being said in the OP is that time in consequencially non existant for the time between except for that, again to mention, atleast third correspondant that is basing them together and regulating structure capabilities, and that regulating interval of the fact of itself is that that it is mearly of a digital backtrack construct of thought and not of actual quantification other than what we say is relativity- which goes as far to say that everything in existence will have relativity to every other until it achieves non-relativity, and as when such comes into play that one can look at modern hypothesis and give them the stink eye of "If your dark matter out at the very edge and beyond is non-relative and pressumably entagled does it not make the perfect source of constructing a future phenomina if not disturbed by another operation trying to come to bear?" Which is ofc as proposed in the book as the baring that is giving availability to the phenomena.

[Anonymous No.5471449]

[Anonymous No.5471825]

[Anonymous No.5471833]

>>5471825
Why would you bump this obvious unscientific troll bullshit? What psychotic rages of mental dysfunction encourage you to bump a four hour old shitpost thread with a cretinous macro image reply?

[Anonymous No.5471865]

>>5471833
If you were off by more than 1 half of a quarter in physics you would be shunned by not just your entire community but your mother and your own sexuality

also- captcha: Lift nadlings