[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 44 KB, 600x358, 153-e1345768269105-600x358.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5291938 No.5291938 [Reply] [Original]

Nissan Haramein.

This is what he says: Consciousness in physical form is a feedback to larger consciousness that resides outside of physical form. It's the way the universe learns about itself and expands experience. Physical form is right in the middle with infinities stretching into the macro (planets, stars, universes, etc.) and the micro (molecules, cells, atoms, etc.) so our consciousness comprehend both the macro and micro (with a little help from technology) The Big Bang is still banging at the center of every atom, so creation is continuous.

Here's my take on it, given all that....God is the intelligence driving the process and is at the same time the sum total of all of it. We, and everything else, are his creation. But this God is hardly so insecure that he takes offense about our "sins" and has some hell brewing. NO, this God is truly an "awesome God, "conscious of everything. Just as the Bible says He knows when a sparrow falls....because He IS the sparrow. Like us, the sparrow may not be all of God, but God is all there is to the sparrow.

>> No.5291942

>>5291938
follow me to the gay planetarium

>> No.5291945

>consciousness

Stopped reading right there. Leave /x/ bullshit in /x/.

>> No.5291953
File: 496 KB, 200x178, 1351957669357.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5291953

here's my take on it
i don't know, but whatever truths we don't know or can't ever know are proably not related to religion, which was probably made up

>> No.5291955

Why don't you ask yourself, before posting, the following questions: What evidence is there to back up these claims? How are these claims more parsimonious explanations for what we observe compared to the currently accepted theory? What implications do these claims have (i.e. what predictions follow from it that can be put to the test?).

In my opinion, the answers would be, respectively: There is none; They aren't; None. So, if it were me, I would have not posted this ridiculous crap.

>>5291942
I love you.

>> No.5291961

He's got some interesting ideas but apparently his math doesn't check out.

>> No.5291970

>>5291955
Okay OP, let's look at some of your opinions
>conscioussness physical form
Being conscious is not a physical form itself, rather it's a system of your vital organs keeping your brain alive giving you this consciousness. The brain itself is useless without this system, your physical conscious isn't apparent.

>> No.5291983

>>5291970
There is no consiousness / soul at all. It doesn't have evidence and is not observable.

>> No.5291986

>>5291983
0/10 this was never funny.

>> No.5291988

>>5291986
Science and rationality aren't supposed to be funny.

>> No.5291995

>>5291986
serioulsy nigger citations or gtfo.

>> No.5292023

>>5291938

0/10