[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 14 KB, 335x266, 3768-le-monkey-face.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5196182 No.5196182 [Reply] [Original]

the stupidest shit you heard on /sci/

il start

1.(goes something like this)IM GOING FOR A CHEMISTRY MAJOR,tldr CAN ANYBODY ENPLANE ME WHAT IS A MOL

2.IM GOING TO STUDY BIOLOGY IN COLLAGE, CAN ANYONE EXPLANE ME WHY DO LEAFS TURN YELLOW OR RED IN AUTUMN

3.(in some quantum physics thread) YEA IM GOING TO STUDY QUANTUM PHYSICS IN COLLAGE (failed miserably at expressing his highschool algebra, calculus and explaining the third law of thermodynamics)

4.(this is from a while ago)1) Does something which is weightless have resistance? Like, if you were in a car cruising at 100km/h on a perfectly straight road with absolutely no wind, you would slow down because air has genuine substance as you move through it. The faster you go, the thicker the air effectively gets. But if something is weightless and traveling at the same speed in the same conditions, would it slow down on it's own?

2) Is it possible to slow down a photon and would it still be emitting visible light? Say, for example, you had a machine that could shoot photons in a way that it looked like a wall of light. Could those photons be slowed down to a point where you could walk faster than it, but continue to emit visible light?

>> No.5197696

bump

>> No.5197712

>>5196182

Haha, I remember the first one on your list.
I couldn't believe that shit. I suspect and hope he was trolling though.

>> No.5197715

>>5196182
>Is it possible to slow down a photon and would it still be emitting visible light? Say, for example, you had a machine that could shoot photons in a way that it looked like a wall of light. Could those photons be slowed down to a point where you could walk faster than it, but continue to emit visible light?

Oh shit what

>> No.5197758
File: 163 KB, 923x694, shelf.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5197758

>> No.5197800

>>5196182
>the stupidest shit you heard on /sci/
>1.
>2.
>3.
>4.
>2)

Apparently counting can be quite difficult for some people.

>> No.5197806

>>5197800
No, just paragraph structure. If you bothered to read the entirety of 4 you'd realize it was a two part question.

>> No.5197808

>>5197800
>1.
>2.
>3.
>4. 1)
>> 2)

Did you really fall for this?

>> No.5197812

>>5196182
>COLLAGE
>COLLAGE
Either you mean their studying their subject using the art form know as collage, or you're throwing some serious stones in a house of glass.

>> No.5197813

>>5197812
*they're

>> No.5197819

>>5197812
Or he's intentionally making orthographical errors while paraphrasing another poster in order to make that poster look even more stupid. Thanks for showing us that your mentalization skills are stuck in kindergarten.

>> No.5197823

>>5197819
I doubt it, because out of quotation he stated:
>il start
Also, I haven't "heard" anything on /sci/ because I read with my eyes and not my ears.

>> No.5197825

>>5197823
>Also, I haven't "heard" anything on /sci/ because I read with my eyes and not my ears.

Who are you quoting? My post didn't contain the word "heard".

>> No.5197831

>>5197825
The original post.
>the stupidest shit you heard on /sci/
I was using that morsel of evidence to solidify my claims that OP is in fact retarded and throwing stones in a house of glass.

Thanks for showing us that your mentalization skills are stuck in kindergarten.

>> No.5197836

>>5197831
You actually took OP serious? Well, newfags gonna new.

>> No.5197840

>>5197836
Autism on a science board?
Next you're going to tell me there's rampant homosexuality on /hm/.