[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 200 KB, 595x501, 1237738161677__large[2].png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5150079 No.5150079[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

/sci/, why are there no girls on the internet?

>> No.5150099

Because that's false.
btw im a girl :3

>> No.5150103

>>5150100
just as you have no proof otherwise

>> No.5150100

>>5150099
you have no proof

>> No.5150109
File: 4 KB, 300x163, 1292879692260.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5150109

>>5150103

You made the positive assertion, thus have the burden of proof..

>> No.5150112
File: 341 KB, 1247x256, 1349970946681.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5150112

/thread

>> No.5150768

>>5150109
awwwww daaayyyyuuuuuum nigguh
you dun wrecked dat hoe

>> No.5150774

>>5150109
The positive assertion was originally made by OP (who just so happens to be a faggot, but thats probably coincidental) who claimed there are no girls on the Internets.

>> No.5150822

>>5150112
That post is stupid and sexist.

>In real life people like you for being a girl.
This does not make sense, people like both males and females unless they are sexist.

>They want to fuck you
Oh? Any girl?
No they do not; people are not usually so shallow.

>Advantage of being a girl
It is very clear that whoever wrote that is juts a stupid sexist who only pretends to find girls interesting, and is a dishonest misogynist.

Most guys do not do that.

>> No.5150829
File: 256 KB, 494x359, 1341375503756.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5150829

>>5150822

>> No.5150835

>>5150829
I am not particularly angry, more disappointed that people think like that, than angry.
Guys who only talk to you because they fancy you are quite easy to spot.
One can tell when they are faking the conversation and only pretending to be interested.

>> No.5150891

Why is /sci/ full of misogynist neckbears? You guys are worse than r9k.

>> No.5150894

>>5150891
It is not 'full of them'.
They are rare, it is just that they are more loudmouthed than the more sensible and mature people on /sci/.

>> No.5150904

>>5150894
Hello Harriet.

>> No.5150939

That's a fallacy. And, obviously, you're wrong. I'm a girl. I'm on the internet. So, there's at least a girl on the internet, and i know i'm not the only one.

>> No.5150957

>>5150939
That is not what they mean when they say that.
Obviously there are girls on the internet, just see Facebook for proof.
They mean this: >>5150112

They mean that it does not matter whether you are female or not.
While that is true, they still should not have put it across in such a mindless and sexist way.

>> No.5150960

>>5150822
Males are more sexual, by instinct we like girls we have a chance with AUTOMATICALLY. This is a fact.

Women require that men follow arbitrary kinks like having money, being handsome, smart, powerful, etc.

So yeah, what that guy said was put in a mysoginistic way, but that's part of why women are disliked in the internet. Most stupid women (not all of them) act like that in real life, then they come here and we're able to act rational and see through the bullshit.

And yes, we can tell you're a girl for your saging, that's code for "mad"

>> No.5150963

>>5150960
>Males are more sexual

This is false.
Every time a man has sex with a woman, a woman also has sex with a man.
Think about it.

>by instinct we like girls we have a chance with AUTOMATICALLY
No.
If she has an undesirable personality, then one will not like her even if she is physically. attractive, unless one is very shallow.

>And yes, we can tell you're a girl for your saging, that's code for "mad"
I am not mad, and my sex is irrelevant.
This thread is not science, and it is sexist trolling garbage.

>> No.5150965

Why are there two of the exact threads side by side?
OP did you fuck up and think your thread didn't get posted?

>> No.5150967

>>5150963
Sex doesn't just have to be between a man and a women.

>> No.5150974

>>5150963
>implying masturbation is not sexual activity
>implying women don't get spitroasted
>implying men always have sex with women
>imply you're not just feminist bitch

>> No.5150996

>>5150967
I never said that it had to be.
My statement was still correct.

>>5150965
Look carefully; it is not the same thread, it has been reworded differently.

However, it is still spam.
See >>5150916

>> No.5150999

>>5150974
">implying"
That is not a good way to discuss the issue.
Do you actually have a point to make?

>> No.5151005

Look, i'm not a feminist (Well, yes i am, but just because this society is really sexist, and sucks), but i think the gender is something you don't choose, so, being a woman is exactly the same of being a man. Society is what configure us to be what we are suposed to be. And you know what? that sucks. Because i don't want to be a damsel, i don't want to be beautiful or sexy, and i don't want to get atenttion only because i'm a woman. So, stop generalizing, because i want to be valorated of who i am, because my intelligence and not because my genre, so, i'm not going to say i'm a woman, but i'm not going to deny it neither, because it doesn't matter at all, at least, for me.

>> No.5151008

>>5150996
>This is false.
Well this isn't true unless you got some studies you can link to saying how women are just as sexually active as men.
Men having sex with women is just a fraction of the sexual activities men undertake if you count masturbation.
Hahah one says why are there only girls on the internet...ohwell, this thread still needs to die

>> No.5151007

>>5151005
>because my intelligence

Then post your IQ.

>> No.5151010

>>5151005
>i think the gender is something you don't choose, so, being a woman is exactly the same of being a man.

That's retarded.

>> No.5151015

>>5151007
IQ is used to measure shit in children I'm pretty sure, it also seems pretty culturally biased.
(I took one a while ago online so I don't know how accurate it is but I had to do shit with shapes, so if your education had more geometry in, I assume you'd get higher score

>> No.5151020

>>5151010
Thank you for the intellectual input. You are truly too intelligent and too educated for this board. Your deep understanding of language and your expressiveness are beyond anything a mere mortal can understand.

>> No.5151027

>>5151015
In other words: you scored low. IQ is designed to be neither culturally nor educationally biased.

>> No.5151032

>>5151015
>IQ is used to measure shit

Last time I checked IQ was used to measure intelligence, not shit. I'd prefer to quantify shit by measuring its volume.

>> No.5151034

It isn't retarded. Because being a woman or being a man maybe it isn't the same biologically, but, that doesn't mean you have have to be like that (i'm talking about personality) if you are woman because we are the ones who decide what we want to be or do, not our gender.

>> No.5151035

>>5151027
Nigga please, I scored 142.
Apparently that makes me smarter then Newton and all those bitches even though I only got Cs' last year.
I must be one of those geniuses who get bad marks cause the things they do in class are below them..r-rite guys?