[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 292 KB, 378x500, 1349163577186.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5142514 No.5142514[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

80% /b/ cant solve: -6 × 2 + -4 × -3
>cry

>> No.5142529

Of course they can't... Is this supposed to be surprising?

They can't even solve 1+1x0

>> No.5142533

>americlaps in charge of solving higher math problems

>> No.5142535

>>5142529

Huh?

>> No.5142537

0
what's so difficult about that?

>> No.5142539

>> No.5142540

>>5142537
please be a troll

>> No.5142542

>>5142535
I... don't understand how what I said could possibly confuse you....

Or are you just baffled at the fact that they can't solve 1+1x0=x
It's true, try it. They will tell you that x=0

>> No.5142544

>>5142533
>Higher math
>Gradeschool math

>> No.5142545

>>5142544
>number theory and abstract algebra
>gradeschool math

>> No.5142546

>>5142540
Oh lord... Is this thread seriously going to turn into an argument about that simple equation?

you disappoint me /sci/.

>> No.5142551

>>5142540
wtf, how can -6 x 2 + -4 x -3 not equal 0

-6 x 2 = -12
-4 x -3 = 12

-12 + 12 = 0

I can't see any other number possibly coming out of this.

>> No.5142604

>>5142551
i think they were referring to about 1+1x0.

>> No.5142622

>>5142604
Nah, this was a completely separate line of conversation that had nothing to do with the 1+1*0 comment

>> No.5142627

>>5142622
thanks Mr.Deceiver :D

>> No.5142630

-6 x 2 + -4 x -3
-6 x 2 + -12
-6 x -10
-60

>> No.5142633

>>5142551
Order of operations. That would be (-6 x 2) + (-4 x -3) =0

>> No.5142634

>>5142540
please be a troll

>> No.5142637

>>5142514
-6 x 2 +-4 x -3
-6 x 8 x -3
48 x -3
-144

>> No.5142644

>>5142630
hahahahah, yes, you got it broh :D
btw i know you are trolling, not trying to be asshole D:

>> No.5142666

>>5142637
You just went full retard. (jk, I know you're trolling) 2+-4=8 can't stop fucking laughing, you just pulled that out of nowhere.

>> No.5142668

>>5142633
yeah that's exactly what I did, it's not necessary to mark with parentheses where an operation obviously has precedence.
I was just illustrating each step.

>> No.5143230

-6x2 = -12
-4x-3 = 12
-12 + 12 = 0
Ever nigger who disagrees is a mango

>> No.5143384

And once again /sci/ feels smart because they can argue about conventions.