[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 22 KB, 380x380, hal-varian.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5130182 No.5130182[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

>allmyfrustration.jpg

>> No.5130203
File: 40 KB, 399x388, sadfrog.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5130203

>> No.5130213

>>5130182
Is he a gay porn actor?

>> No.5130221
File: 9 KB, 480x360, policedowns.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5130221

>>5130213
are you le serious

>> No.5130230

>>5130221
I'm always le serious. =0

>> No.5130244
File: 97 KB, 480x360, copwithdowns.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5130244

>>5130230
fuck you carlfag/physicsfag

>> No.5130251

>>5130244
Nice dubs, but my answer is no.

>> No.5130254

I just looked him up. Here's a paper of his.

http://people.ischool.berkeley.edu/~hal/Papers/2006/position.pdf

As someone majoring in math I'm baffled by how he chose his variables here. Can someone explain this?

Consider the problem of assigning agents a= 1,…, A to slots s= 1,…, S where agent a's
valuation for slot s is given by u sub as =v sub a*x sub s
. We number the slots so that x1>x2 >··>xS
. We also set
x sub s = 0 for all s>S

But wait didn't we just say that s = 1......S? How the fuck can s > S ever if this is your set?

>> No.5130344

>>5130254

Come on guys this is important.

>> No.5130888

>>5130254
>>5130344
all <span class="math">x_s[/spoiler] for s larger than the integers in set S are set to 0. this is probably convenient for the algorithm