[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 106 KB, 922x882, incafeel.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5119322 No.5119322[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

I'm not sure how to word this question.

If graham's number was physical in some way, and confined to a point in space, how large would the black hole that it spawned be?

I mean if every bit that makes up that number had the mass of some elementary particle

pic unrelated

>> No.5119370

>>5119322

you could try plugging that number into Hawking's black whole entropy equation...but the notation might drive you insane.

>> No.5119399

Really fucking big.
There is really no scale that can even describe it. The number of square Plank lengths in the entire observable universe is a joke compared to Graham's number.
I can't even give you a scale of how many universes long the radius of the event horizon would be, since it'd be basically on the same scale as Graham's number in the first place.
It's a fucking huge number.

>> No.5119404

To give an idea, there are about 10^80 atoms in the universe.
Now think about how small 10^80 is compared to Graham's number.