But why is it always mice?

File: 75 KB, 481x700, mouse girl.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

But why is it always mice? Anonymous Sun Aug 26 01:28:06 2012 No.5002197 [Reply] [Original]

But why is it always mice?
Have you ever wondered why we always choose mice for animal testing?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TA2JwJ0J3lE&feature=plcp

>>	SAGE SAGE Sun Aug 26 01:31:21 2012 No.5002215 NO NO NO

Anonymous Sun Aug 26 01:34:36 2012 No.5002229

Funny that she skipped the two biggest reasons:

1. There is a vast amount of research on rodents, especially mice, which means if you want your research to reach the widest audience you'll want to do it in rodents. It also makes planning experiments easier since rodent protocols are plentiful.

2. Mice have by far the greatest amount of genetic research done on them, which means that if you want to do a knock-out/knock-in study you'll probably want to do it in mice.

Anonymous Sun Aug 26 01:50:05 2012 No.5002268

Essentially, mice were the small fast-reproducing mammal that we started with, so it gained momentum and now mice are more convenient because we've already got so much more initial investment in them. If you went back to the beginning it could have been hamsters. Then someone would have a silly post saying "But why is it always hamsters?"

It's basically a positive feedback loop where sooner or later one of the small mammals had to dominate.

>>	Anonymous Sun Aug 26 06:37:44 2012 No.5002672 Excellent video, OP. Please make more :D

>>	Anonymous Sun Aug 26 07:07:14 2012 No.5002717 Trying too hard to get partnership and earn dosh.

>>	Anonymous Sun Aug 26 07:22:31 2012 No.5002748 >>5002717 >not realizing you're helping every time you bump one of her threads, ensuring they won't 404, she gets more views as a result. Smooth move. Every bump helps her, so keep doing it if you want that.

Anonymous Sun Aug 26 14:47:34 2012 No.5003678

>>5002197

I use mice in my cancer research because they most closely resemble humans in their immuno-systolic responses. We could use simians, but it would be cost prohibitive.

Excellent video, btw, OP. Do you do your own production, or do volunteers help out?

>>	Anonymous Sun Aug 26 19:24:49 2012 No.5004372 >>5002717 Who are you quoting?

>>	Anonymous Sun Aug 26 19:41:05 2012 No.5004407 Show tits OP.

>>	Anonymous Sun Aug 26 19:44:34 2012 No.5004418 >>5004407 No, seriously, I would love to see your cute little tits.

>>	upvote upvote Mon Aug 27 00:38:00 2012 No.5004968 >>5004372 upvoting comment

>>	Anonymous Mon Aug 27 06:12:28 2012 No.5005387 >>5004407 offensive

encephalon !!shxfCFb4+j/ Mon Aug 27 09:11:13 2012 No.5005602

There's also fewer ethical limitations for working with rodents than with primates - you don't even have to be sterile to perform neurosurgery on a mouse, but you have to be sterile if you're even going to touch the inside of a macaque recording chamber. No IRB cares about rodent lesion work, but monkey lesion work is very very difficult to get approved

>>	Anonymous Mon Aug 27 17:41:44 2012 No.5006580 >>5004407 Seriously, guise. Why is /sci/ so sexist?

>>	EK !EKFnQG0UBo Mon Aug 27 17:44:28 2012 No.5006586 >>5006580 because a large proportion of /sci/ are bitter male nerdy betas, who suck at getting women, and then hate the women for not falling for their fat useless nerdy selves.

>>	Anonymous Mon Aug 27 17:53:58 2012 No.5006604 File: 24 KB, 949x436, Warning.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Aug 27 17:54:13 2012 No.5006610 File: 8 KB, 430x230, In the words of the shitposter.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Aug 27 23:11:13 2012 No.5007395 What if mice were the most intelligent people on earth? Would they do experiments on humans?

>>	Anonymous Mon Aug 27 23:23:28 2012 No.5007433 >>5007395 >mice were the most intelligent people >mice >people What?

>>	Anonymous Tue Aug 28 02:03:06 2012 No.5007730 Anyone have a link to her Higgs boson video?

>>	Anonymous Tue Aug 28 02:25:20 2012 No.5007762 Why she doesn't wear mouse costume just like in the picture when she appears in the video ? That girl looks adorable, with bows, tail and mouse costume. >>5007730 You can view all of her videos here : https://www.youtube.com/user/TitanDaniela/videos

>>	Anonymous Tue Aug 28 03:50:24 2012 No.5007928 >>5007762 You're either Carl, or yet someone else who doesn't bother to heed warnings (maybe one of our new /fit/ exchange students): >>5006604 >>5006610 Y'all posting in a known troll thread.

>>	Anonymous Tue Aug 28 05:18:09 2012 No.5008038 MICKEY REPORTING IN

>>	Anonymous Tue Aug 28 16:13:23 2012 No.5008889 >>5007928 How's this thread trolling? OP seems to have a legitimate science question.

>>	Anonymous Tue Aug 28 16:25:08 2012 No.5008918 >>5007928 This isn't a troll thread. It's a thread to learn about how science is done. Fuck off

>>	Anonymous Tue Aug 28 16:27:38 2012 No.5008926 >>5008038 >mickey That's an infantile cartoon

>>	Anonymous Tue Aug 28 17:19:38 2012 No.5009033 >>5008889 >>5008918 >>5008926 All three of them - Carl. Troll harder.

>>	Anonymous Tue Aug 28 20:13:53 2012 No.5009473 >>5009033 I'm not Carl. Fuck off. This is a legitimate thread.

>>	Anonymous Tue Aug 28 20:31:54 2012 No.5009497 >their metabolical is similar to us. this is why i do not like her. also it is over-produced and if you do not realize this is the work of production company i am disappoint

>>	Anonymous Wed Aug 29 05:06:29 2012 No.5010303 who is "Carl"? is he a mod, or just a popular /sci/ poster? I see ppl talking about him everywhere. ok, maybe it's an inside joke, and i need to LURK MOAR lol.

Anonymous Wed Aug 29 05:15:29 2012 No.5010311

>>5010303
carl is a poster notorious for insulting people and telling them how wrong they are, although half the time they're not and he has no clue what he's talking about. since he doesn't tripcode, it is suspected that there are in fact people who shitpost on purpose under the name carl.

>>	Anonymous Wed Aug 29 14:53:24 2012 No.5011175 daniella supporters get in here!

>>	Carl Wed Aug 29 15:29:32 2012 No.5011241 >>5010311 I don't think you know what you're talking about, little boy.

>>	Anonymous Wed Aug 29 15:31:01 2012 No.5011246 >>5011241 No, he nailed it. You're basically sci's bad joke now.

>>	Anonymous Wed Aug 29 15:34:32 2012 No.5011257 >>5010311 >there are in fact people who shitpost on purpose lel Babby's first day on /sci/?

>>	Carl Wed Aug 29 15:37:03 2012 No.5011267 >>5011246 >making good science posts >bad joke Choose one. You really don't know what you're talking about.

>>	Anonymous Wed Aug 29 15:41:49 2012 No.5011278 >>5011267 Bad joke chosen. Because that's what you are. Have you not noticed that the instant someone says something trollish now they get accused of being you?

>>	Carl Wed Aug 29 15:43:49 2012 No.5011282 >>5011278 I am well aware of one mean troll going around trying to discredit my person. Do not listen to him.

>>	Anonymous Wed Aug 29 15:46:47 2012 No.5011299 >>5011282 I don't need to take his word, I've had conversations with you myself.

>>	Carl Wed Aug 29 15:48:02 2012 No.5011304 >>5011299 So you are butthurt because I scientifically corrected you in an earlier converstation?

>>	Anonymous Wed Aug 29 20:01:49 2012 No.5011743 >>5011282 'Mean Troll'.. LOLZ you pansy.

>>	Carl Thu Aug 30 05:34:21 2012 No.5012645 >>5011743 I hate mean trolls like Carl.

>>	Anonymous Thu Aug 30 06:55:29 2012 No.5012706 >>5007433 >>5007395 That looks like a Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy reference. captcha: answerfo effect of course, dawg.

>>	sage Thu Aug 30 10:54:53 2012 No.5013132 sage

>>	Anonymous Thu Aug 30 11:12:13 2012 No.5013161 >>5011175 I'm here!

>>	Anonymous Thu Aug 30 15:50:10 2012 No.5013715 >>5012706 >>5012706 that was a bad movie

>>	Anonymous Thu Aug 30 19:23:23 2012 No.5014400 >>5013715 I agree.

>>	Anonymous Thu Aug 30 19:55:33 2012 No.5014505 >>5011175 Here I am.

>>	Anonymous Fri Aug 31 03:31:30 2012 No.5015389 File: 86 KB, 476x306, lol lol lol lol.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5011175 Can I be part of the club?

>>	Anonymous Fri Aug 31 03:54:21 2012 No.5015410 this thread confirmed for gay

>>	Anonymous Fri Aug 31 04:09:53 2012 No.5015425 sage

>>	Anonymous Fri Aug 31 11:23:09 2012 No.5015964 >>5015425 bump

>>	Anonymous Fri Aug 31 14:54:57 2012 No.5016418 >>5015389 That gif made me laugh so hard.

>>	Anonymous Fri Aug 31 20:14:18 2012 No.5017321 I think we shouldn't do experiments with mice. I like mice. They are cute little animals.

>>	Anonymous Fri Aug 31 20:21:48 2012 No.5017337 >>5003678 Pretty much, yeah. For pharmaceuticals and the like, they respond fairly similarly to humans, and they're inexpensive

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 1 05:05:48 2012 No.5018278 >>5017337 Then why haven't we cured cancer yet?

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 1 05:24:03 2012 No.5018293 >>5018278 We did. Well, mouse cancer anyway.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 1 13:09:02 2012 No.5018891 >>5018293 We cured mouse cancer? How?

Anonymous Sat Sep 1 13:37:47 2012 No.5018948
File: 461 KB, 1920x1080, wallpaper.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

If we started killing dogs left and right in the name of science, everyone would flip a shit.
ALSO, people pay exterminators to kill mice if they have an infestation. You call animal control for a loose dog.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 1 15:06:32 2012 No.5019212 >>5018891 One major technique is inhibiting blood vessel growth to cancer cells. "Fighting Cancer with Angiogenesis Inhibitors. Injections of angiostatin inhibit the metastasis of certain (mouse) primary tumors."

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 1 15:18:32 2012 No.5019255 >>5019212 Carl and EK. why u neglect this thrd.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 1 15:24:32 2012 No.5019274 >>5019255 >implying they don't post anonymously here to piss people off

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 1 19:33:48 2012 No.5019873 >>5019274 [citation needed]

Anonymous Sat Sep 1 19:51:02 2012 No.5019908

>>5018948
So you think they don't use dogs in scientific experiments? You're wrong, beagles are the standard type of dog they use in canine experiments, although golden retrievers are also used sometimes.

They don't use them quite as often, but they do use them. Dogs are simply better models for certain diseases. They also use cats for some types of research.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 1 19:53:47 2012 No.5019909 >>5018293 >implying cancer is one disease >implying we cured all types of mouse cancer >implying we haven't also cured a vast amount of human cancers Get the fuck out oh my god

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 2 01:51:49 2012 No.5020481 >>5019909 Listen here, jerkface. We have cured every disease in the mouse. We even made a paralyzed mouse walk again.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 2 02:06:03 2012 No.5020504 >>5020481 even in /sci, its still 4chan

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 2 09:31:04 2012 No.5021101 >>5020481 [le citation needed]

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 2 15:31:49 2012 No.5021692 >>5020481 mice are people too. evolution much?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 3 01:48:22 2012 No.5022993 >>5019908 Why don't we breed dumber humans for purposes of testing?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 3 10:20:37 2012 No.5023667 >>5022993 It's happening. Take a look outside.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 3 14:56:08 2012 No.5024302 >>5020481 >We have cured every disease in the mouse Really EVERY disease? Could you please back that up with a citation?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 3 17:28:52 2012 No.5024686 >>5022993 Because morality is a bitch.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 4 00:12:38 2012 No.5025757 >>5011175 Me!

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 4 09:48:09 2012 No.5026477 >>5024302 I meant that we have translated the entire mouse genome, and that will lead to solving every disease. Maybe not in your lifetime, so be careful with mice.

>>	the Great and Powerful EK Tue Sep 4 14:55:37 2012 No.5027200 >>5026477 i support mice rights. just because they are small doesn't mean you should toy with them. or give them tumers. no toys no tumers. that's my sloagen.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 4 19:03:46 2012 No.5027681 >>5026477 But we have sequenced the entire human genome as well. That doesn't imply we can cure every human disease.

>>	Anonymous Wed Sep 5 03:49:31 2012 No.5029059 >>5027681 This

>>	Anonymous Wed Sep 5 14:57:31 2012 No.5030269 mice are the chosen people, according to the rodent scrolls.

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 6 00:55:36 2012 No.5031568 >>5022993 Morality

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 6 04:11:36 2012 No.5031849 >>5031568 morality is not /sci/

Anonymous Thu Sep 6 04:16:36 2012 No.5031854

>>5002197
Because it has very high homology to humans, easy to rear, a large body of research, we have knockouts for all of their genes.

As I watch this video, many of these points and more are said. I am not nearly as angry as I thought I would be, I thought she would be against it.

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 6 04:18:36 2012 No.5031856 >>5031849 Ethics and morality is very /sci/. We need these to continue to get funding, and as such are vital for scientific progress.

>>	sage sage Thu Sep 6 04:21:36 2012 No.5031859 >>5031856 Fuck off Carl

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 6 04:24:36 2012 No.5031862 >>5002564 >>5008072 >>5002197 why do you continually post these videos?

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 6 06:13:36 2012 No.5032027 >>5030269 What are these?

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 6 06:19:36 2012 No.5032039 Oh, a cute science thread. How creative.

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 6 14:00:36 2012 No.5032734 >>5002672 +1

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 6 20:46:03 2012 No.5033792 >>5031856 I have to agree. I couldn't think of scientific research without ethics and morality.

Anonymous Fri Sep 7 04:05:08 2012 No.5034620

>>5031862

why do you think it's the same person? by the same logic, I could run around saying that only one person dislikes these scientific videos.

HEY! I BET THAT'S TRUE!!! one hate-filled troll is trying to ruin /sci/ and IT IS YOU!! no wonder the mods keep banning you, and you go make yet another thread on /q/:

>>>/q/163370

that's about the 5th or 6th thread that has been on /q/ so far. if i were a mod it would really start to piss me off.

>>	Anonymous Fri Sep 7 05:14:08 2012 No.5034714 very cute

>>	Anonymous Fri Sep 7 16:05:38 2012 No.5035774 >>5031854 At least this guy got it.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 8 04:05:07 2012 No.5037538 >>5034620 ridiculous theory, sir. go back to /b/.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 8 04:15:22 2012 No.5037559 >>5034620 >>5037538 comeday gold

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 8 14:37:39 2012 No.5038835 >>5034620 it is one or two aspies doing it. it will be interesting around here if they pass the janitor test. very interesting.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 8 19:58:39 2012 No.5039908 >>5038835 I seriously hope this doesn't happen. It would be terrible.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 9 11:19:38 2012 No.5041354 It's not always mice. Think of Schrodinger. He used a cat for his experiments.

>>	the Great and Powerful EK Sun Sep 9 14:38:26 2012 No.5041911 >>5038835 aspies are useful at times. i keep a few around the trailer to ward off the mormons.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 9 21:08:11 2012 No.5043350 >>5038835 >interesting Nice euphemism.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 10 04:06:04 2012 No.5044274 >>5038835 >>5034620 Why do you think such irrelevant things?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 10 04:16:14 2012 No.5044295 >>5031849 Have you even read Sam Harris?

Anonymous Mon Sep 10 04:39:08 2012 No.5044321

>>5038835
Yeah, I'm glad for this video, and I hope lots more threads, either by DT or other science videos, get posted. We need more threads like this, not less. Once everyone sees what an improvement it will be when sci is full of youtube video threads, I think they will stop complaining and people will see that no mod action is needed, either for DT threads or any other kind of youtube video thread.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 10 15:23:33 2012 No.5045338 4chan. coded by morons. but, it is free, so i love moot. oh, moot.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 10 20:36:02 2012 No.5046132 >>5044321 I wholeheartedly agree.

>>	sage sage Tue Sep 11 04:20:32 2012 No.5047148 >>5044321 are you insane?

Anonymous Tue Sep 11 05:32:03 2012 No.5047227

>>5047148
By who's standards?

informal use of the term "insane" is to denote something considered highly unique, passionate or extreme, including in a positive sense

others use the term loosely as a means to criticize particular ideas, beliefs, principals, desires, personal feelings, attitudes, behaviors, or actions...this is mere political posturing

When discussing mental illness in medical terms, "psychopathology" is considered a more preferred and an overall less derogatory descriptor.

>>	Fred Tue Sep 11 09:57:20 2012 No.5047544 >>5047148 yes. it's part of /sci/ board culture.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 11 10:24:04 2012 No.5047556 I actually use rats in my lab. I also use a lot of bovine tissue samples.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 11 10:25:21 2012 No.5047557 >>5007395 Fuck no, because humans out live mice. Mice would use something with an even smaller life span than their insignificant time on this planet.

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 11 15:15:39 2012 No.5048064 >>5047556 >rats >mice Where's the difference when it comes to medical experiments?

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 11 19:21:48 2012 No.5048962 >>5048064 >pls respond

>>	Anonymous Tue Sep 11 19:28:18 2012 No.5048986 because we can easily overpower them. between the weak and the strong it is freedom which oppresses.

>>	Anonymous Wed Sep 12 04:58:25 2012 No.5050264 >>5048064 bump on this

>>	Anonymous Wed Sep 12 05:07:11 2012 No.5050288 >>5008889 I agree. /sci/ needs more content like this.

>>	Anonymous Wed Sep 12 14:39:56 2012 No.5051119 >>5048986 humans should be more advanced than that, and treat mice as fellow mammals.

>>	Anonymous Wed Sep 12 19:41:56 2012 No.5052127 >>5051119 Seconded. Mice should be better protected.

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 13 03:19:10 2012 No.5053131 >>5006580 Not all of /sci/ is sexist. It's just a couple no-life neckbeared trolls who shit up the board all day.

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 13 03:30:55 2012 No.5053155 >>5053131 Why would anyone do this?

justaboson Thu Sep 13 03:34:55 2012 No.5053163

>>5050288
TLDRmaggot here.
Good point, curiosity ought not be punished.
Mice, like Mendev's peas, are numerous, have easily distinguished and manipulated phenotypes, may have many generations over a short period of time, and most importantly, are the one of the least human sympathetic mammals while still holding much in common or analogy with our genetics, biochemistry makeup, and system of organs.

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 13 03:50:25 2012 No.5053187 hthxgfhgxfh

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 13 05:21:11 2012 No.5053399 >>5053163 Mice feel nice in your hands. All warm, soft.

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 13 14:47:10 2012 No.5054324 >>5053399 this is the whole point that escapes the average /sci/entologist.

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 13 17:25:40 2012 No.5054955 >>5054324 /sci/ can't feel warmth?

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 13 17:31:10 2012 No.5054992 Cool video

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 13 17:47:25 2012 No.5055071 >>5054955 Nope

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 13 17:53:25 2012 No.5055094 >>5055071 Why not?

>>	Anonymous Thu Sep 13 18:01:57 2012 No.5055133 >>5055094 Lots of people on /sci/ can. It's the few shitposters who bring the whole board down.

>>	Anonymous Fri Sep 14 05:13:54 2012 No.5056073 >>5053399 You could say the same about spiders.

>>	Anonymous Fri Sep 14 05:29:54 2012 No.5056104 >>5056073 But spiders aren't warm-blooded

>>	Anonymous Fri Sep 14 06:12:24 2012 No.5056153 >>5056104 big ones are. and some of the small ones in the summer are able to form quasi-warm blood. there's an article at science.com.

>>	Anonymous Fri Sep 14 06:35:39 2012 No.5056171 >>5056073 Are you retarded? We have more in common with mice than spiders, seeing as we both are fucking mammals.

>>	Anonymous Fri Sep 14 06:38:39 2012 No.5056176 >>5056171 most spiders are not mammals, even if they have breasts. the distinction is found elsewhere in the chordata.

>>	Anonymous Fri Sep 14 07:12:54 2012 No.5056225 >>5056176 >thinking I wasn't referring to humans and mice Autism detected.

>>	Anonymous Fri Sep 14 07:14:55 2012 No.5056229 >>5056225 i was agreeing with you. you're aspergers is showing.

>>	Anonymous Fri Sep 14 14:43:39 2012 No.5056915 >>5056176 err, spiders don't have breasts, at least not like human females.

>>	Anonymous Fri Sep 14 20:57:37 2012 No.5057756 >>5056915 Spiders don't need breasts at all. They are not mammals.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 15 04:41:16 2012 No.5058576 >>5056225 It's not nice to call someone autistic.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 15 04:52:31 2012 No.5058601 >>5002672 I agree

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 15 05:00:32 2012 No.5058623 >>5002672 She should have one on quantum decoherence out by Monday

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 15 14:27:42 2012 No.5059476 >>5058623 i can't wait. i've watched these so many times i can recite the lines. hot girls are so random. and she is totally hot.

>>	Anonymous Sat Sep 15 20:21:43 2012 No.5060271 >>5058623 If that's true, I'm excitedly looking forwards to monday.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 16 03:24:18 2012 No.5061127 >>5002229 But why mention those? They are both trivialities.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 16 03:32:03 2012 No.5061145 >>5059476 She is both hot and cute

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 16 03:42:03 2012 No.5061173 >>5061145 Hot, cute, and sexy. Is there a word for all of these put together?

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 16 03:48:34 2012 No.5061192 >>5061173 Nope. There should be one though

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 16 03:57:18 2012 No.5061215 >>5061192 It should be something like titanlicious

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 16 04:04:18 2012 No.5061235 >>5061215 That's cute :3

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 16 04:11:18 2012 No.5061258 Straight MINDFUCK!!!!

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 16 04:20:48 2012 No.5061283 >>5061258 Awesome girl, right?

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 16 04:34:18 2012 No.5061326 >>5061283 the mice make me cry.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 16 04:40:18 2012 No.5061345 >>5061326 Why?

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 16 14:49:59 2012 No.5062448 >>5061345 why not. it's very metaphysical.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 16 19:12:14 2012 No.5063248 >>5062448 Oh, I see

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 16 20:54:59 2012 No.5063603 mice are my favourite rodents

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 16 21:06:29 2012 No.5063641 >>5063248 Me too

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 16 21:08:15 2012 No.5063646 One post less to hit bump limit.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 16 21:09:14 2012 No.5063648 >>5063646 Two posts less to hit bump limit.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 16 21:10:14 2012 No.5063651 >>5063648 Three posts because I'm a huge faggot.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 16 21:11:29 2012 No.5063654 >>5063651 Four posts because why the fuck not?

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 16 21:12:44 2012 No.5063657 >>5063654 Five posts.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 16 21:13:29 2012 No.5063658 >>5063657 Six.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 16 21:14:44 2012 No.5063660 >>5063658

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 16 21:16:45 2012 No.5063664 >>5063646 >>5063648 >>5063651 >>5063654 >>5063657 >>5063658 you're going to enjoy a ban for this

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 16 21:18:14 2012 No.5063670 >>5063664 >implying mods

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 16 21:20:59 2012 No.5063672 >>5063670 >implying many people don't enjoy their bans

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 16 21:21:00 2012 No.5063675 >>5063672 >implying implications

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 16 21:21:29 2012 No.5063678 >>5063675 >implying you have been here for more than 5 minutes you don't even know the bump limit

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 16 21:24:29 2012 No.5063683 >>5063678 300~500 posts like other boards, I think. I never seen a /sci/ thread hit bump limit anyway.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 16 21:50:14 2012 No.5063732 >>5063683 quit saging

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 16 21:51:15 2012 No.5063736 >>5063732 My posts are irrelevant to this thread, therefore I sage them. Do you even know how sage works?

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 16 21:52:29 2012 No.5063739 >>5063736 Even if your posts are relevant you should be bumping this thread if you post in it. It's on of the few science threads on /sci/ currently. We have been spammed with too much homework

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 16 21:53:59 2012 No.5063741 >>5063739 aren't

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 16 21:54:00 2012 No.5063744 >>5063739 >>5063741 No, bumping with irrelevant content like you're doing would be rude.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 16 21:55:29 2012 No.5063747 >>5063744 Nope because it gets more poasters into the thread

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 16 21:58:29 2012 No.5063757 >>5063747 The last 80 posts in this thread have been off topic and meta, it will spark no relevant discussion anyway.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 16 22:41:29 2012 No.5063934 bump

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 16 22:44:45 2012 No.5063946 >>5063934 Enjoy your ban

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 16 23:20:30 2012 No.5064068 All these dead posts around me, I want them all.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 16 23:21:31 2012 No.5064072 Worry not, shitposter.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 16 23:22:30 2012 No.5064078 I'll repost an equal amount of posts for you.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 16 23:23:30 2012 No.5064083 -5

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 16 23:24:30 2012 No.5064086 -4

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 16 23:25:30 2012 No.5064095 -3

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 16 23:26:30 2012 No.5064099 -2

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 16 23:28:30 2012 No.5064109 -1 Done.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 16 23:31:15 2012 No.5064123 >>5002197 what a cute mouse

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 16 23:32:14 2012 No.5064126 >>5064123 I have to agree.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 16 23:34:29 2012 No.5064131 >>5064123 One more post for when you'll delete that.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 16 23:35:14 2012 No.5064136 >>5064126 as do I.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 16 23:37:44 2012 No.5064144 File: 7 KB, 225x225, images.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 16 23:38:30 2012 No.5064146 >>5064136 There's something about that helpless face that... I don't know. You understand, right?

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 16 23:38:59 2012 No.5064147 File: 33 KB, 800x505, sadfdasds.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5064144 >>5064144 >>5064144 >>5064144 >>5064144 >>5064144 >>5064144 rollin

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 16 23:39:44 2012 No.5064150 >>5064144 Keep the dubs elsewhere, please.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 16 23:40:45 2012 No.5064153 >>5064147 You too, you're giving the shitmod a reason to ban you. And that's counterproductive.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 16 23:44:00 2012 No.5064164 File: 146 KB, 600x600, sdfdas.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5064153 I'm posting from Tor. Good luck banning me.

>>	Anonymous Sun Sep 16 23:46:45 2012 No.5064171 >>5064164 Carry on, then.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 17 00:09:30 2012 No.5064240 In two hours, it will be 22 days since the creation of this thread.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 17 00:26:30 2012 No.5064290 >>5064240 so?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 17 00:53:29 2012 No.5064360 >>5002197 bumping for infantile mouse

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 17 02:24:45 2012 No.5064540 File: 28 KB, 330x357, 186.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5002197 >tfw infantile mouse is deleted

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 17 02:29:44 2012 No.5064547 >>5064540 >>5064360 Are you fucking kidding me? Are you literally fucking kidding me? The guy deletes the "infantile cartoon", but not the thread? This place has worse moderation than stormfront

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 17 02:31:59 2012 No.5064549 The mod is lurking this thread, or posting in it, or both. He just deleted the anime mouse girl from >>5002197

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 17 02:32:30 2012 No.5064555 >>5064547 The infantile cartoon isn't science and isn't related. The video in OP is science. It's actually not that bad.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 17 02:36:29 2012 No.5064563 >>5064555 >>It's actually not that bad There is not a video in existence that's good enough to be up for 22 days.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 17 05:25:15 2012 No.5064975 >>5064540 >>5064360 What was the infantile mouse? I want to know what it looked like.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 17 05:41:14 2012 No.5065007 >>5064975 bump for infantile mouse. anybody save it?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 17 05:49:30 2012 No.5065021 >>5065007 Here you go anon http://images.4chan.org/jp/src/1347875327955.jpg

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 17 05:52:44 2012 No.5065026 File: 86 KB, 429x696, cute_Mouse.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5065021 thank you. i need to learn how to find stuff like that.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 17 05:54:44 2012 No.5065037 >>5065026 I'd be careful reposting that here. It's an infantile cartoon, you know.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 17 05:58:59 2012 No.5065046 >>5065037 i cropped it so it's not as infantile. maybe it's ok now?

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 17 14:43:29 2012 No.5066102 >>5065021 I agree. That picture was offensive.

Anonymous Mon Sep 17 14:43:29 2012 No.5066104

>>5064547

i suppose that the mod deleted the image because it was anime or something that is restricted to another board.

whereas the video content is science, so the mod had to make a call.

i've come to really appreciate the mods and janitors lately. they have to deal with massive amounts of shitposting, and yet they stay calm and objective.

moot does a good job of selecting and training them. and we have to keep in mind that moot loses money on 4chan, and everyone else is a volunteer.

so please think twice before you criticize them. walk a mile in their shoes...

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 17 17:18:29 2012 No.5066640 >>5065021 What a cool image

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]

/sci/ - Science & Math