[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 30 KB, 800x600, 800px-Fractal_Broccoli.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4965451 No.4965451 [Reply] [Original]

nearly everything is organized in the structure of fractals. Mostly patterns are not obvious to see but sometimes they are recognizable:

>>Broccoli

any more?

>> No.4965463

i dont get how fractals work, once you zoom in far enough wouldn't you just start getting proteins and molecules and shit? therefore nothing is really infinitely symmetrical.

>> No.4965467

>>4965463
molecules and deeper structures are also fractals.
from the largest structures to the deepest dimensions possible to analyze everything is organzied in fractal symmetry

>> No.4965475
File: 37 KB, 1024x768, Dahlia-Flower-Mix.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4965475

flowers

>> No.4965498
File: 28 KB, 150x140, 150px-Barnsley_fern_plotted_with_VisSim.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4965498

fern.

>> No.4965521
File: 46 KB, 525x525, 525px-Quark_structure_proton.svg.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4965521

So I'm still not seeing how this is a fractal

>> No.4965531

stone

>> No.4965537 [DELETED] 

cat = fractal

all cats are fractals

>> No.4965542

>>4965521

that*s a painted picture of up and down quarks.
show me some real ones please.

>> No.4965551

>>4965451
What is dimension of cat?

>> No.4965558

>>4965542

That's because they're point particles.

Not fractal particles

>> No.4965563

>>4965558
why can't points be fractals?

>> No.4965570 [DELETED] 

>>4965563
Points ca't be fractals

>> No.4965575

>>4965570
But if we don't know dimension of cat, and don't know if points can be fractals. how can we be fractal?

>> No.4965583

That's not a fractal.
It doesn't go on infinitely.
In fact, nothing in the real world is a fractal.

>> No.4965585

>>4965583
Why does it have to go to infinity to be fractal?

>> No.4965587 [DELETED] 

>>4965585
>>4965585
It doesn't have to be, but if it isnt infinite than there is a separate function defining it outside a 'fractal universe' therefore the logic the universe is a infinite fractal doesn't follow, unless you can prove a cat is a fractal.

>> No.4965589

first this is not broccoli it's romanesco
second yes thats why the only observable and viable super strings behave in a fractal orbifold shape

also banana's!

>> No.4965596

>>4965587
beep boop
<span class="math"> dim_H(\text{cat})=\frac{3}{\sqrt{2}} [/spoiler]
pwnd i just proved dim of cat.

>> No.4965600

People obsessed with fractals and Fibonacci numbers, the hipsters of compsci.
2 deep for u

>> No.4965634

would the fibonacci sequence be a fractal? I know there is a lot of stuff in nature that grows in that sequence, but I can only think of diamond right now.

>> No.4965710
File: 67 KB, 574x460, plant3.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4965710

>>4965463

this was me, what i meant to say is that when you zoom in you start seeing shit like this which is just not symmetrical, what im trying to say is fractals are bullshit, nothing is infinitely symmetrical, once you zoom in enough its not fucking symmetrical. i fucking hate fractals and fags like you that think they're so divine and shit. THEY'RE NOT ITS JUST FUCKING BULLSHIT IDIOTS LOOK AT AND SAY OOH PRETTY SCIENCE PRETTY NATURE. you want to see something beautiful? How about the formation of life and reproduction in biology. How about the glow of xenon when electricity is conducted through it in chemistry? How about the orbit of the planets in physics? how about eulers formula in mathematics? how about dijkstra's algorithm in computer science. Fractals are not beautiful they are retarded and fuck you for even liking them.

i'm with this guy 100%
>>4965583

OH YEAH AND FUCK YOU CAPTCHA FOR NOT FUCKING BENIG LEGIBLE

>> No.4966308

>>4965570
>>4965563
what are points? stupid idea, there must be something inside

>> No.4967384

>>4965589
Thanks, I was worried I'm the only one who noticed

>> No.4967409

Those are the thoughts of dorks who take psychedelic drugs. I would know.

>> No.4967411

>brocolli fractals
>biology
>hard science

>> No.4967420
File: 7 KB, 189x217, 1319768997132-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4967420

>>4965710
>this fucking level of idiocy
>THIS FUCKING LEVEL OF IDIOCY

>> No.4967432
File: 4 KB, 126x126, 1342567781150.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4967432

>>4965710

Lol'ed pretty hard.

>He thinks fractal in the real World means it goes on infinitely

As another poster has stated.

THIS LEVEL OF STUPIDITY

>> No.4967434

>>4965583
>>4965463
It doesn't recur infinitely because it's made of finite cells.
If it wasn't made of cells finite in size, it would recur infinitely.
Am I being trolled?

>> No.4967441

>hay i just red dis wiki on fractals. better head off to /sci/.

>> No.4967443

Tree branches, lightning (electric current on a whole?), silicon after a piece of acrylic is pressed into it and pulled away
These are only the obvious ones.

>> No.4967445
File: 6 KB, 256x256, myhead.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4967445

>>4965710
>not going deep enough

>> No.4967455
File: 78 KB, 698x658, 1304075320694.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4967455

>>4966308
>he thinks a point is divisible

>> No.4967474
File: 130 KB, 500x332, klydonograph2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4967474

OP wants images?

>> No.4967483
File: 32 KB, 450x375, romanesco-cauliflower.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4967483

If romanesco broccoli were to be self-similar at all scales, like a true fractal, the cells would have to be infinitely small, and the thing could never exist as it does.
Implications of this?

>> No.4967523
File: 28 KB, 400x315, tuniq_2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4967523

>>4967443
>silicon after a piece of acrylic is pressed into it and pulled away
Pic related is what I meant.
My apologies for typing silicon instead of silicone

>> No.4967531

>>4965451
>nearly everything is organized in the structure of fractals.

No, nothing is. Nothing that physically exists can be a fractal.

>> No.4967540
File: 737 KB, 2704x1831, Lichtenberg01.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4967540

Lichtenberg figures.

>> No.4967544
File: 82 KB, 660x495, Romanesco+Broccoli.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4967544

>>4967531
But it tries very hard to be fractal.

>> No.4968412

>>4967483
you are thinking of "self-identical" not "self-similar"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L-system#Origins

>> No.4968420

>>4965467
Molecules are not fractals. Neither are atoms, and neither are sub-atomic particles. You are all psuedo science faggots that make real science harder to do.

BUT QUANTUM MECHANICS MEANS THAT HOMEOPATHY WROKS GIVE ME MONIES FOR REMEDEIS!!!"£$!

>> No.4970733

>>4968420
When you give yourself an aneurysm from all this raging stupid, please video tape it and upload a link here for science.

>> No.4970745

how about the <fibbonacci spiral>?

>> No.4970981

>>4970733
He's right, though, you fucking hack.

>> No.4970999

>>4970981
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractal#fractals_in_nature

Whatever you say, kiddo, stay mad.

>> No.4971065

If everything was structured after the same model, I think this world would be a whole hell of a lot more interesting.

>> No.4971066

>>4971065
*less

>> No.4971106

>>4967483

Nothing.

Because reality doesn't change to meet our perceptions.

>> No.4972742
File: 1.25 MB, 2047x2047, 76785635257867832234223469834456.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4972742

>>4965521

>> No.4972805

>>4970999
>Approximate fractals
>Approximate
>APPROXIMATE

>> No.4972831

>>4965710
> Fractals are not beautiful they are retarded and fuck you for even liking them.

No, fuck you for not seeing how awesome fractals are in academics, and hating fractals because some new age idiots have defiled them. Don't overlook things just because they have bad fanbases.

>> No.4972884
File: 10 KB, 360x315, 8_cell.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4972884

2 dimensional fractal, oh that is cute.

>> No.4972926
File: 146 KB, 1008x633, 1315435004629.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4972926

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r2YyTpXkges

>> No.4972945

dumbass here
if something in real life were to be infinitely fractal doesn't that mean it's weight would also be infinite?

>> No.4972952

>>4965467

Lovely statement. Where's your proof for it?

>> No.4972961

>>4972945
you think if you add 1/4 + 1/16 + 1/64 + 1/256 + · · · the result is infinity, dont you

>> No.4972974

>>4972945
No.
If you add:
.9 + .09 + .009 + .0009 + ...
you get 1

>> No.4973005

>dood errrything is a fractal one conciousness sacred geometry one love peace brotha science is god ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffttt pass the duchie mahn

potheads pls go

>> No.4973018
File: 254 KB, 640x449, 4516938146_0a04aeac3c_z1[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4973018

coastlines are fractal like

>> No.4973101
File: 1.89 MB, 470x271, 6qwcja[1].gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4973101

>mfw this thread