/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.4889518]

http://www.thespiritscience.net/
Prove them wrong, /sci/.

[Anonymous No.4889524]

>Prove them wrong
lrn2science

Let's hear them make a testable prediction.

[Anonymous No.4889534]

In one of their videos they said over population will kill us.

[Anonymous No.4889536]

>>4889524
>The world is made out of vibrating energy
>We are all one being experiencing different perceptions of your existence in this world
Your move, anon.

[Anonymous No.4889546]

>>4889536
Those.... are not testable predictions.

[Anonymous No.4889553]

We can't, paranormal and the occult are completely unrelated to science, so there's no way to scientifically "disprove" them.

[Anonymous No.4889557]

>>4889553
They're also completely unrelated to reality, which is why they are untestable and unscientific.

[Anonymous No.4889558]

The alternate history is a cool fiction, the beliefs in powers is a non-harm belief, the sacred geometry is not based on phi and is therefore less than awesome, the overall harmless nature of a life devoted to adapting the mind to experiences is nothing that needs to be shattered for the sake of shattering. I myself meditate for calm and clarity and thought process, but I know there's nothing super natural going on.
Let the sleeping dog lie, enjoy the colorful artwork, and have fun listening to the cool stories.

[Anonymous No.4889561]

>>4889557
I wouldn't say reality, more like scientific reality. That is the scientific perspective on nature is incompatible with theirs.

[Anonymous No.4889577]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=I2LbUrmmsUA

GRAVITY LOVES US, said Stonned Jesus

[Anonymous No.4889579]

>>4889557
If it's not scientific, why is it called spirit science? Doesn't that mean it's science in relation to spirituality?

[Anonymous No.4889592]

>>4889579
Noooope. It is spirituality with elements of popular science thrown in. People have been doing it for decades. It's called "pseudoscience." And belongs on >>/x/