[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 15 KB, 480x360, edhfedf.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4879208 No.4879208 [Reply] [Original]

I have conducted a massive experiment and am now dumping with my result.

I wanted to determine which fruit burns faster, carrots or celery.
I placed 6 carrots over an open fire for 10 seconds at 430 degrees. I then placed 6 pieces of celery over an open fire for 10 seconds at 430 degrees.
The results showed that the carrots burned less, I was not satisfied.

I placed 6 fires over an open carrot for 430 degrees. I then placed 6 fires over an open celery for 430 degrees. The results didn't match the previous experiment 6 carrots were then placed.over an open celery for 430 fires, 6 pieces of celery were then placed over an open carrot for 430 fires. The result caused my dog to die. I then placed 6 degrees over an open 430 for celery, I then placed 6 degrees over an open 430 for carrot. I concluded the celery was worthless so I threw it into a trash can at 50 metric tonnes per second.

I then put 430 over an open carrot for fires degrees, The carrot decomposed at 400 parts per million for every kilometer per carrot. Once measured, the decomposition rate was converted into a Jpeg and sent back in time to the year 2500 at a rate of 16 carrots per fire of open celery. I finally concluded that 6 burnings over an open Jpeg at a rate of carrots caused the decomposition rate to exceed 500 kilowatts for every 430 degrees per celery.

This has determined that carrots burn slower than celery.

>> No.4879232

Good job OP. All bases have been covered.

>> No.4879239
File: 2 KB, 111x107, 1277014192615.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4879239

>"This has determined that carrots burn slower than celery"

>Stopped reading there

Carrots are clearly more flammable.

They have a combustion rate of 12 cubic sextants per fiber of polyacetylene.

>> No.4879244

neither carrots nor celery are fruits..

>> No.4879248
File: 53 KB, 753x557, 1314045380345.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4879248

>not measuring out mass

>> No.4879277
File: 157 KB, 997x602, DiamondMetal.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4879277

OP, finding an old funny comic that has been on the web for at least a million years and tweaking it with "fruits" doesn't make this "your" experiment.

>> No.4879287
File: 780 KB, 325x203, 1342497435634.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4879287

>>4879277

Oh yeah, hardest metal. SOOO close to what I was explaining. *killyourself.

>> No.4879778

This is about the most scientific thread on /sci/ right now.

>> No.4879814 [DELETED] 

In this ITT: inane, irrelevant, asinine, imbecilic, infantile trolling garbage.
I approve of it.

>> No.4879857
File: 10 KB, 199x199, 1327264694579.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4879857

today, OP was straight

>> No.4880046

The fruit with the most calories burns faster?

>> No.4880117

>>4880046
shit nigger did you think this was a science board?

>> No.4880123

>>4880046
that makes no sense, calories are the things that actually burn, so the more calories to be burn the LONGER it should take.

>> No.4880140

>>4880123
O shit you're right... I think?

I don't fucking know. Yeah, probably right.

>> No.4880259

*applause for OP*

>>4880123
Counterpoint: TNT does not react slowly despite having a high potential chemical energy.

Other factors are at work here. If the substance is more porous, then more oxygen will be already present in the sample for a quicker initial reaction.

All we can say for certain is that the way your mom sucks is the main reason that penises combust very slowly