/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.4873474]

Or at least why are many intelligent people still single?

[Anonymous No.4873477]

women are attracted to confidence, not intelligence

[Anonymous No.4873476]

Because bitches don't care about intelligence.

[Anonymous No.4873479]

>If women are attracted to intelligence

lel, stopped reading there, xDDDDD

[Anonymous No.4873480]

It's how you express your intelligence.

Fuck off back to /r9k/

[Anonymous No.4873488]

If men are attracted to intelligence, why aren't you gay?

[Anonymous No.4873487]

>>4873474
Because most women aren't attracted solely to intelligence, and many intelligent people have only their intelligence going for them.

[Anonymous No.4873490]

>>4873474
Because of the Jews.

>>4873488
Again, because of the Jews.

[Anonymous No.4873634]

>>4873488
>implying I'm not gay

[Anonymous No.4873672]

>>4873474
Because whores don`t give a fuck about intelligence.

[Anonymous No.4873679]

because you arent funny.

the list always starts off with,
"He's smart, Funny, etc"

[Anonymous No.4873682]

>>4873679
No, the list starts with "He's a <insert any non-science major here>".

[Anonymous No.4873695]

>>4873490
I don't understand.

[Anonymous No.4873697]

>>4873695
That's because of the jews.

[Carl No.4873703]

>>4873697
Disinfo agent detected.

[Anonymous No.4873706]

Because women don't want to marry a robot, they want to marry an alpha male who can beat up little nerds like you if they stare at her tits in public.

Seriously, if you have to ask what women want other than intelligence, then you clearly have never thought in depth about the factors affecting women and what safety-seeking creatures would do.

For a scientific bunch, you sure let your small dick fears get in the way of nature's simplest mechanism.

[Anonymous No.4873707]

>>4873697
Could you please explain yourself?

[Anonymous No.4873741]

Because when you find the position, you won't have the momentum, and when you finally have the momentum, you won't find the right position.

[Anonymous No.4873753]

pic related

[Anonymous No.4873774]

sage dis if y cry evrytime

[Anonymous No.4873777]

Fuck this is so dumb


9/10 almost responded

[Anonymous No.4873789]

Because many of all people are still single. Do you have a source inversely correlating some metric of intelligence with the probability of being in a relationship?

[Lion !FvAwVR8cv6 No.4873799]

>being on /sci/
>inteligent

yea nah

[None !RIsV3CoVY2 No.4873832]

Because no one wants to date online

[EK !EKFnQG0UBo No.4873848]

>>4873476
>>4873477
>>4873479
>>4873672
[sarcasm] yes, because all women clearly want to date someone who is a complete moron and has nothing interesting to talk about, we totally get off on that [/sarcasm]

[Carl No.4873853]

>>4873848
Birds of a feather flock together.

[Anonymous No.4873865]

>>4873848
I'd only date a girl who knows limits.

[EK !EKFnQG0UBo No.4873873]

>>4873865
wow, you again?
you should probably fucking trip...

[Anonymous No.4873878]

>>4873873
Nah, I don't want you to filter my valuable posts.

[Anonymous No.4873879]

>>4873873
Who is the delightful lady in the avatar pics please
?

[EK !EKFnQG0UBo No.4873880]

>>4873878
lel, i dont filter anyone.

[EK !EKFnQG0UBo No.4873883]

>>4873879
http://www.youtube.com/user/factvsreligion

[Anonymous No.4873887]

>>4873883
Thank you!

[Anonymous No.4873893]

>Or at least why are many intelligent people still single?

Most people are.

[EK !EKFnQG0UBo No.4873894]

>>4873893
>most people are single
wut? nah, thats dead wrong.
old people are almost never single, they get married long before that. its pretty rare to find anyone over 30 who's been single for a long time.

[Anonymous No.4873904]

Most of women are stupid as fuck.
Most of men are stupid as fuck.
Most people don't even understand what does it mean to be intelligent.
Most of people just like the idea but all they want is someone who is not a complete retard or actually intelligent.
The same goes for looks. You can dream about Jessica Alba but if your looks are around B or C then your partner should be B,C or lower. A looking people date A looking people and same goes for intelligence.

[EK !EKFnQG0UBo No.4873906]

>>4873904
wow, you rate looks on like an A B C scale??

[Anonymous No.4873907]

>>4873906
Yes but there's also D, E and F. Or you can use scale from 1-10 if you like.

[EK !EKFnQG0UBo No.4873909]

>>4873907
yeh, the 1-10 scale is more common, but trying to scale something like appearance on a linear scale is still kinda dumb, IMO.

[Anonymous No.4873912]

>>4873904

Not always true. I'm incredibly intelligent and my girlfriend is as thick as fuck, because she's a woman.

[EK !EKFnQG0UBo No.4873915]

>>4873912
how the fuck can you talk that way about your own girlfriend??
i wish she could read your post, you fucking scumbag!

[Anonymous No.4873916]

>>4873915

>i wish she could read

So do I.

[Carl No.4873922]

>>4873916
5 star post

[Anonymous No.4873924]

>>4873916
5 star post.

[Anonymous No.4873925]

>>4873922
Oh damn. Here come the samefag accusations.

[Carl No.4873927]

>>4873924
Oh damn. Here come the samefag accusations.

[Anonymous No.4873928]

>>4873909
I view it this way. I'm in a bar and there's bunch of girls around. I choose the best looking and grade her or them A which usually means "too good for me". Then I see who are just hideous or repulsive and I grade them D so that leaves me two categories in between. The rest will be Bs (my target category) and Cs (if Bs fail me category). And on that scale I consider myself to be B or B-.

[EK !EKFnQG0UBo No.4873929]

>>4873922
>>4873924
samefag

[Anonymous No.4873930]

>>4873916
Perfect, 10/10.

[EK !EKFnQG0UBo No.4873932]

>>4873928
that's fucking pathetic, you shallow judgemental cunt.

[Anonymous No.4873939]

>>4873932
Are you maybe ... projecting? Because he's just reflecting your hypocrisy.

[EK !EKFnQG0UBo No.4873942]

>>4873939
>he's just reflecting your hypocrisy.
oh, do explain.

[Anonymous No.4873944]

>>4873932
How would you choose which women to approach? Unless you're psychic, you only have your sight, hearing, and maybe smell if they're close enough to go on.

[Anonymous No.4873949]

EK, as a fellow woman, why don't you shut the fuck up?

All you accomplish on /sci/ is validating what everyone in this thread is saying about women.

[Anonymous No.4873952]

>>4873942
Why should I bother explaining something to someone who doesn't even understand limits?

[EK !EKFnQG0UBo No.4873953]

>>4873944
i can approach anyone. if i want to talk to another woman i can just go up and talk to her.
that doesnt mean i'll only approach people i think are physically attractive, i like talking to all kinds of people, men and women.
if i happen to think they're physically attractive, and i think theyr'e into me, then maybe things move further from there.

[Anonymous No.4873954]

>>4873952

ahahaha

[EK !EKFnQG0UBo No.4873955]

>>4873949
>All you accomplish on /sci/ is validating what everyone in this thread is saying about women.
no i dont, what makes you think that? i didnt say anything wrong.

[EK !EKFnQG0UBo No.4873957]

>>4873952
>cop out

[Anonymous No.4873958]

>>4873953
I thought we were talking about approaching somebody in the hope of a romantic relationship. In which physical attraction is a huge part.

[Anonymous No.4873959]

>>4873958
EK doesn't know what a romantic relationship is. She only thinks of "fuck buddies".

[EK !EKFnQG0UBo No.4873960]

>>4873958
it is part of it, yeh. but its not the whole thing, is it?
even if their hot, if it turns out they're a complete fucking antisocial asshole then i dont want anything to do with them, even if they are hot (although in my experience, attractive people tend to be far less likely to be assholes)

[EK !EKFnQG0UBo No.4873961]

>>4873959
[sarcasm] yes, which clearly means i dont even know the definition of what a relationship is, and i'm clearly too stupid to find out [/sarcasm]

[Anonymous No.4873964]

>>4873955

Look at it this way, everyone in their own ways judges appearances. Everyone knows that women are more inclined to talk to someone if they are physically attractive; even you said:
>if i happen to think they're physically attractive, and i think theyr'e into me, then maybe things move further from there.
Then you call someone a judgmental cunt for only talking to women based on how they looked.

[Anonymous No.4873962]

>>4873474
Because women are attracted to intelligence and not douchy know-it-allism that breaks into self pity?

[Anonymous No.4873963]

>>4873932
Of course I can approach any girl, guy or something in between them if I like. But if I'm looking for potential partner (long-term or not) then I know for a fact that it's not worth going beyond your own level or too much under your level. Same goes for intelligence.

[EK !EKFnQG0UBo No.4873968]

>>4873963
> then I know for a fact that it's not worth going beyond your own level or too much under your level. Same goes for intelligence.
i hate to break it to you, but theres no such thing as 'levels' when it comes to things like this.
they only exist in your mind.

[EK !EKFnQG0UBo No.4873970]

>>4873964
yes, based ONLY on how they look.
just talking to someone, that shouldnt even be a factor at all.
and if thinking about dating someone, its only one factor out of many.

[Anonymous No.4873974]

>>4873968
>See EK in bar
>Think she's good looking (implying you're not a no-life fatty)
>Let EK = B
>See bunch of better looking women, they = A
>See bunch women who look worse than EK, they = C

Grade everyone accordingly. Prediction would be:
A: 10 %
B 30 %
C 60 %

[EK !EKFnQG0UBo No.4873975]

>>4873974
>only thinking i'd be a B

[Anonymous No.4873976]

>>4873970

We all should know that looks... whether you like it or not, plays a big role in how approachable one is and how likely you will find a boyfriend/girlfriend.

Men have it worse because they are supposed to be the ones that approach us. They need to have the confidence, looks, intelligence to land a woman, well... a smarter woman. Us women just need to smile, nod, and some need to put on some make-up (I've seen miracles with make-up before). We aren't expected to be smart, to make the money, or to do anything. Some of us try to change that stigma, but to out right deny that most women are not basing their relationships mainly out of looks is false.

[EK !EKFnQG0UBo No.4873978]

>>4873976
well then, shit clearly needs to change, doesnt it!

[Anonymous No.4873979]

>>4873474
sage for ek thread

[Anonymous No.4873981]

All of you should leave /sci/ and go there: >>>/x/10497406

[Anonymous No.4873986]

just to give everyone a heads up, Ek is permabanned. However be careful because reporting her can result in a week long ban.

[EK !EKFnQG0UBo No.4873988]

>>4873986
lel, i aint permabanned.

[Anonymous No.4873992]

>>4873979
Sage doesn't work like that, sorry. Use sage when you have something to say but don't think the thread deserves a bumb. Posting only "sage" is like going to a football match only to tell everyone you don't like football.

[Anonymous No.4873994]

>mfw someone posted pictures of EK from her facebook and she looked like a sloane ranger from the mid 90s.

You're still pretty, you just looked trapped in 1996. It reminded me of LaserDisc and John Major.

[Anonymous No.4873997]

intelligence on its own is shit you do need some social skills, but fuck if you're intelligent you probably know how to act around women tho you do need some experience, but in my opinion the reason why so many intelligent people aren't in a relationship is because the average person is borderline fucking retarded, to be able to notice every single wrong thing that retard says is not'n else but pure torture thus no gf/bf

[Anonymous No.4873999]

>>4873988

yes you are permabanned you carpet munching cunt.

>>4873992
>>4873994

mods detected

[EK !EKFnQG0UBo No.4874000]

>>4873994
that aint my facebook, rose isnt me, that was just the fallout from a different tripfag trolling, quite a long time ago.

[Anonymous No.4874002]

>>4873997
My first gf was really good with people and had great social skills but she was a moron in everything else. It was the nail in the coffin for me when she started ranting about how dangerous nuclear power is and we should get rid of it. Of course I tried to convince her otherwise, I even printed death-statistics to her, but she was just one of those "But one day on explodes and we all die hurrrrr".

[EK !EKFnQG0UBo No.4874004]

>>4873999
>you carpet munching cunt.
holy shit, fuck you you stupid fucking homophobe
>mfw bigots, on my fukken' /sci/
GTFO

[Anonymous No.4874008]

>so many of us

because none of you are actually intelligent.

[Anonymous No.4874009]

>>4874004
>uses the word nigger

>calls me a bigot

stay mad you nigger loving dyke

[Anonymous No.4874011]

>>4874000

Can you post your real one please? I'll be nice.

[Anonymous No.4874019]

Three major issues:

1) you might simply be too young. If you're still in highschool, most girls don't really care that much about intelligence unless it's part of a "perfect in every way" package- it'll help you if you're also athletic, but otherwise it's neutral. It's not until you get to college that intelligence starts being attractive on its own (and it really does! I went for two years thinking I kept magically getting girls out of my league until I realized that).

2) You might not actually be intelligent. A lot of /sci/ really isn't that smart, they just have an interest in things traditionally thought of as being the domain of intelligent people. If you think you're "intelligent" just because you're in a STEM major or because you've memorized a bunch of physics ideas, you're not getting anyone wet. I can't exactly pick out what it is about intelligence that turns women on (probably because it's as irrational an attraction as being into nice muscles), but it's actual intelligence they respond to. You need to actually be actually clever.

[Anonymous No.4874020]

>>4874002
exactly some people are just stupid no dancing around that, it's bearable if they have a redeeming quality such as mindblowing good looks or great social skills but in the end you'll just snap from all the stupid bullshit

[Anonymous No.4874024]

>>4874022
Your other option is to just invite girls along to study in your school's library- either just with them or with a group. Then just do your homework in front of them on a whiteboard (I've only ever studied math, phil, and physics; I'm not sure what you do if your major isn't whiteboard intensive but I've never seen a major that mattered that wasn't). If they ask what you're doing (they will), give a brief explanation. If they seem interested, you can get into it but you NEED TO ACTUALLY UNDERSTAND THE MATERIAL. If you can explain it so that they understand it then you're building personal bonds and making yourself seem dominant, like a teacher- all girls want to fuck their attractive teachers- but if you do the typical /sci/ idiot thing of THROWING JARGON AT YOU TO SEEM LIKE A GENIUS then again you'll seem like a needy show-offy tool.


I want to stress that most of this will come naturally if you are actually intelligent though, seriously consider whether or not you are and if you aren't then a body is probably easier to work on.

[Anonymous No.4874022]

>>4874019

3) You might just not know how to display your intelligence. If you start blathering on about how smart you are you're just going to sound like a nerd, and if you bring up your coursework or research where it doesn't belong you're going to seem like you're trying to show off with something that doesn't actually impress anyone. Remember you live in a society that views all majors as being more or less equal, when you're ranting about Lie Groups or whatever it just sounds like "random nerdy thing that I would know if I did math."

If you want to attract people with your intelligence, you need to seem genuinely intelligent. The thing is though, if you really are smart then most of that will come naturally. Your language will be clever, your vocabulary will be broad, and you'll think of solutions no one else does- that's because those things naturally go along with smart people. At boring parties or social gatherings or whatever people will often bring up topics where you can show your intelligence, you can chime in there and it will be apparent how smart you are (or you can arrogantly trumpet whatever popsci nonsense you've memorized and sound like a tool).

[EK !EKFnQG0UBo No.4874026]

>>4874009
i can use the word, without actually BEING racist, you simpleton.

>>4874011
nope, sorry.

[Anonymous No.4874041]

>>4874022
>>4874019
This gentleman is right on the money. Intelligence is only important to women if you can appear charming with it (at least when you're first approaching them).

[EK !EKFnQG0UBo No.4874052]

>>4874041
well yeh, but that should be pretty fucking obvious.
women dont get wet just coz her guy can recite pi to 10,000 places and recite the periodic table backwards.

[Anonymous No.4874063]

>>4874026

But you're lovely and we can continue our discussion of gender roles seen in the other thread in private.

[EK !EKFnQG0UBo No.4874079]

>>4874063
>But you're lovely..
oh, you!

and why in private? good discussion should be open discussion.

[Carl No.4874086]

>>4874079
>good discussion
>on /sci/

[Anonymous No.4874089]

>>4874020
Well she had big boobs and wide ass.

[EK !EKFnQG0UBo No.4874090]

>>4874086
lel, dont be like that
if you think good discussion is impossible, then why are you even here?

[Carl No.4874092]

>>4874090