[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 33 KB, 500x333, medicine.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4855544 No.4855544 [Reply] [Original]

What breakthroughs in medicine can we expect in the next 5-10 years?

>> No.4855560

breakthroughs or major changes*

>> No.4855557

the cure of cancer
immortality
superhuman strength

>> No.4855562

stuff. mostly medicine, hardly any lasers.

>> No.4855564

I'd like to break through her medicine if you know what I mean.

>> No.4855566

>>4855557
you forgot horse cock transplants

>> No.4855567

I don't know but OP's pic disgusts me.

>> No.4855569

>>4855564
YOU MEAN TO STICK YOUR PENIS IN HER VAGINA RIGHT?

>> No.4855586

Human Kidney printing

>> No.4855589

>>4855566
That would be cool and all, but getting an erection might leave you feeling pretty lightheaded due to the huge amount of blood it would take.

>>4855567
With any luck, there will be a cure for your homosexuality too.

>> No.4855596

>>4855589
I am not homosexual. I'm just disgusted by 2/10 whores.

>> No.4855603

>>4855596
>I'm just disgusted by 2/10 whores.
Whoa, why are you so angry with her? You don't even know this woman.

>> No.4855607

>>4855603
Are you new to /sci/ board?

>> No.4855612

>>4855603
Thanks to OP I had to look at her picture. This is enough evidence to conclude that she is a worthless slut.

>> No.4855613

>>4855607
No sir, I've been here all summer.

You seem to harbor a lot of resentment toward this upstanding doctor though. Why is that? I'm sure she's saved dozens of lives, but all you can do is insult her.

>> No.4855617

>>4855612
What's the matter, champ? You're acting awfully bitter. Had some bad experiences with the opposite sex? Or do you lack the courage to try in the first place?

>> No.4855621

>>4855617
Why the fuck should I interact with anti-intellectual bitches and whores? It's a scientific fact that intelligent women do not exist.

>> No.4855623
File: 377 KB, 1065x1652, 1325893801922..jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4855623

>>4855617
wrong board

>> No.4855626

>>4855621
14 year old with aspergers alert

>> No.4855628

>>4855621
>scientific fact that intelligent women do not exist.
Science has really let itself go, hasn't it?

>> No.4855630

>>4855621
>Why the fuck should I interact with anti-intellectual bitches and whores?
But this woman is a doctor, I think it's a safe bet that she's well educated.

>It's a scientific fact that intelligent women do not exist.
I'm going to require a source as confirmation.

>>4855623
Crap, you're right. I must have accidentally clicked /r9k/.

>> No.4855632

>>4855630
She is definitely not a doctor. She's an uneducated whore who got paid for these pictures.

>> No.4855633

>>4855630
>I must have accidentally clicked /r9k/.
No this is /sci/. Please accept that women are lesser beings or enjoy your ban.

>> No.4855643

>>4855630
>I'm going to require a source as confirmation.
Show me an example or any kind of evidence. It's you who makes a positive claim ("intelligent women exist" lol), so it's your burden of proof. And don't even start coming up with religiontard fallacies.

>> No.4855645

>>4855630
>>4855633
/sci/ is the intersection of /r9k/ and /x/.

>> No.4855650

>>4855632
I ask that you draw your attention to the stethoscope around her neck. If that's not confirmation of her being a doctor, then I don't know what is.

>>4855633
Oh, then I was in the right place all along. That's a relief.
Lesser beings? Do you have a source on that?

>> No.4855653

>>4855650
Everyone with a stethoscope is a doctor? OH GOD MY SIDES.

>> No.4855660
File: 3 KB, 191x185, 1293485521.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4855660

>>4855653

>> No.4855655

>>4855650
>Do you have a source on that?
Do YOU have source for claiming the opposite? It's YOU who is arguing against scientific facts.

>> No.4855665

>>4855650
>Oh, then I was in the right place all along. That's a relief.
>That's a relief.
>relief
So you must really enjoy those bans then.

>> No.4855662

>>4855643
Plenty of examples here: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_in_science

>> No.4855666

>>4855655
You are the one making a claim, the burden is yours.

>> No.4855668

>>4855662
Except that none of them was intelligent. Science requires hard work, not intelligence. And most of them were just whoring around and got supported by real male scientists.

>> No.4855670

>>4855666
I say they don't exist, you say they exist. The one who claims existence is the one who has to provide evidence. Otherwise your magic beliefs are killed by Occam's razor.

>> No.4855669

>>4855666
I make a claim based on SCIENCE. Are you arguing with SCIENCE?

>> No.4855671

>>4855669
lel

>> No.4855677

>>4855665
>So you must really enjoy those bans then.
>So you must really
>really
I'm not sure why we're drawing attention to random words, but who am I to diminish your fun.

>So you must really enjoy those bans then.
Not particularly. I don't think not being a sexist is a ban worthy offense though.

>> No.4855685

>>4855670
You are making the claim that women are lesser beings, thus you need to provide evidence for why you think this is the case.

>>4855668
Just what constitutes intelligence in your opinion? Ability to diminishing the achievements of others?

>> No.4855683

>>4855677
>I'm not sure why we're drawing attention to random words
>random
"Relief" isn't a random word. I highlighted "relief" because you shouldn't be relieved when those bans start coming for you to enjoy.

>I don't think not being a sexist is a ban worthy offense though.
First day on /sci/?

>> No.4855688

>>4855677
Stating the truth is not sexism and what you are doing is trolling, which is a bannable offense.

>> No.4855689

>>4855685
Women are lesser beings because there are no intelligent women.

>> No.4855695

>>4855683
I had a quick look at the rules, but I can't seem to find the rule prohibiting non-sexists from the science board. You should really check your sources.

>First day on /sci/?
I already told you, I've graced this board with my presence all summer.

>> No.4855700

>>4855685
Women are useless. They are physically, intellectually and emotionally inferior. They have no practical or theoretical abilities and they aren't capable of true emotional attachment. At best they are good-looking pets for some years, unable to be grateful. They are a waste of time and money. Even dogs are higher evolved than women.

>> No.4855701

>>4855695
Here I posted the rules:
>>4855623
Plus you're clearly trolling since you're going against the will of science. You will soon have to enjoy a ban.

>> No.4855703

>>4855685
>he doesn't know what intelligence is

>> No.4855707

>>4855688
>>4855689
But I've already provided evidence of intelligent women. So far I haven't seen a single shred of evidence that women are incapable of intelligence, or that they are lesser beings.

>> No.4855713

>>4855707
Your fallacious pseudo-evidence has been debunked. Give us some real evidence or stfu, troll.

>> No.4855715

>>4855707
Women are lesser beings because they are no intelligent women. You haven't shown any women who display intelligence.

>> No.4855720

>>4855715
>>4855713
He wont' provide evidence, because he can't. Intelligent women are as non-existent as ghosts, aliens, unicorns, sky wizards, qualia, consciousness, etc

>> No.4855722

>>4855700
>Women are useless. They are physically, intellectually and emotionally inferior.

>physically
If you're talking about pure brute strength, then I'll give you that. Otherwise, nope.

>intellectually
You've yet to provide evidence to support this claim.

>emotionally
Well they do have a much harder time controlling their emotions, so I can give you this one.


>>4855703
Please, enlighten me.

>> No.4855729

>>4855722
Show me one woman that is even remotely capable of intellectual thought. Right, there is none.

And for their emotions: They are on the low level of retarded children. Higher emotions, especially those towards others, are not known to them.

>> No.4855733

>>4855713
>>4855715
>>4855720
Until you provide me with specific criteria this woman needs to meet, you are right, I cannot. Because you will simply keep moving the goal posts.

>> No.4855738

>>4855733
So you have no idea what you're actually talking about?
3/10 for getting that far. Your trolling skills suck though.

>> No.4855747

>>4855729
>Higher emotions, especially those towards others, are not known to them.
I suppose I can't blame you for holding this opinion. I can't imagine a woman would have ever shown these emotions towards you, repulsive as you are.

>>4855738
I'm beginning to think this is the case with you. I gave you a clear indication of what I need, so that I can provide you with the evidence you seek. Have I not lain it out plainly enough? Do you need me to use even smaller words?

>> No.4855750

FUCK YEAH CYBERNETICS

Seriously, we already have robot hands that can be manipulated by electric impulses from the brain. Next step is neuro-feedback.

>> No.4855752

>>4855747
>using ad hominem

Way to admit your defeat. I knew you couldn't argue against science and logic.

>> No.4855756

>>4855747
>repulsive as you are.
I'm not repulsive. I'm a nice person. Women are repulsive.

>> No.4855757

>>4855623
Wait, why is this wrong board for transhumanists and sci-fi fans?

>> No.4855759

>>4855757
Because underageb& don't belong here.

>> No.4855760

>>4855752
Using science and logic on you wasn't working, I discerned from your posts that you would simply prefer a mudslinging match.

>> No.4855761

>>4855621
>It's a scientific fact that intelligent women do not exist.
>scientific fact
>fact

its an opinion, numbnuts

>> No.4855764

>>4855759
How is transhumanism underage? I myself look forward to overcoming the barriers human physiology imposes on our abilities, and don't see what that has to do with age.

>> No.4855765

>>4855756
>Women are repulsive.
Repulsive? They're so soft and shapely though. Are you sure you're not gay?

>> No.4855766

>>4855760
So you don't want a serious scientific debate? You're here for shitposting? Fuck off.

>>4855761
It is fact. All the evidence we have is supporting it and there is no evidence to the contrary. It's as much of a fact as evolution is.

>> No.4855771

>>4855761
Not really. If it is, then the statement that intelligent men don't exist is also a valid opinion.

>> No.4855772

>>4855764
The scientific basis for human enhancement is worth discussing. The "hurr durr we gonna be robots XD" attitude is shitposting and usually done by underageb&s. The latter is what we refer to as the social movement of transhumanism, while the former is called biomedical engineering. Learn the difference

>> No.4855775

>>4855765
I am not gay.

>>4855771
That opinion is easily disproved. Just look at me. I'm a highly intelligent man.

>> No.4855779

>>4855766
>So you don't want a serious scientific debate? You're here for shitposting? Fuck off.
Are you illiterate by chance? Not once in my post did I imply this. I said when you simply dismissed my side of the scientific debate, I took up your method of simply slinging mud.

>It is fact. All the evidence we have is supporting it and there is no evidence to the contrary. It's as much of a fact as evolution is.
I would love to see this evidence that you can't seem to stop talking about.

>> No.4855785

>>4855779
Take any random woman. The probability of her being an anti-intellectual whore is 100%. Any questions? Any counterexamples? Yeah, I don't think so.

>> No.4855782

>>4855775
>That opinion is easily disproved. Just look at me. I'm a highly intelligent man.
Prove it.

>> No.4855787

>>4855772
Are you dismissing the idea of artificial bodies? Under what grounds?

>> No.4855790

>>4855785
Any examples that I give you will be dismissed because you won't tell me what criteria they must meet.

>> No.4855788

>>4855787
Gooby pls.

>> No.4855789

>>4855772
Just because a lot of idiots say something doesn't mean that anyone who says it is an idiot.

>> No.4855791

>>4855785
>Implying something is scientific fact because of examples

you fail science forever

>> No.4855792

>>4855789
Pretending to be an idiot automatically makes you an idiot. If you want to be taken serious, then don't behave like a retard. Simple, isn't it?

>> No.4855795

>>4855791
That's the same way we prove evolution. Our observational evidence supports the theory and we haven't found any counter-evidence. Do you even science? I bet you're still in highschool.

>>4855790
So you accept that you can't provide examples? Well, case closed.

>> No.4855796

>>4855792
I'm not pretending to be an idiot, I am of the opinion that transhumanism (both through implants and genetic engineering) is the next logical step in human evolution, as long as we wont blow ourselves up. Just because there's some idiots who share that opinion doesn't mean I have anything other than that opinion in common with them.

Your logic eludes me...

>> No.4855797

nanobots performing surgeries all over the world.

I don't know how far along we are with this tech, but I think we are pretty close and it sounds really promising to me.

>> No.4855800

>>4855788

The fuck?

>> No.4855805

>>4855795
So with evolution there is a theory and observations that confirm it.

However, to have scientific fact you don't just need observation, you need a sound theory. So where's you theory on why it's theoretically impossible for women to be intelligent?
Also, you have only provided your own observations for women being unintelligent, based on the limited amount of women you personally know (n=50? 100? maybe 1000? There are more than 3,000,000,000 women on this planet, so however many you know is not representative of the entire population.

>> No.4855812

>>4855796
The problem with transhumanism is just the label. By calling it transhumanism you will be mistaken for an underage sci fi tard. If you want to discuss a certain topic you're interested in and that's based in science, that's great. Go ahead and do it, but please avoid being mistaken for a retard.

>> No.4855813

>>4855795
I accept that you are unable to follow even the simplest of instructions.

Well, my girlfriend wants me to come to bed so I need to leave you now. Farewell, gentle sexists.

>> No.4855818

>>4855805
I'm living in a civilized country and studying at an elite university. If intelligent women can't even be found HERE, then they must hide pretty well.

>> No.4855821

maybe the next breakthrough will be men believing in intelligent women

>> No.4855823

>>4855813
Have fun wasting your time with a subhuman being that has the intellectual level of a dog and the emotional depth of a pile of shit.

>> No.4855826

>>4855821
Why would believing in fairy tales be a breakthrough? We already have religious idiots. We don't need more of them.

>> No.4855827

>>4855823

have fun fapping, dude

>> No.4855829

ITT: sexists who will never come close to Emmy Noether's greatness

>> No.4855833

>>4855827
I have.

>> No.4855838

>>4855829
What did she do? Prove some trivial theorems every child knows nowadays?

>> No.4855840

>>4855812
So what should I call it then? Because not having a label for it would be rather inconvenient.

>> No.4855843

>>4855838
Knowing a theorem =! being able to come up with it.

>> No.4855848
File: 28 KB, 200x200, 1341508658878.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4855848

>>4855838

what did you do?

>> No.4855857

>>4855840
If you want to talk about a specific form of enhancement, then this subject (whatever it is) will have a name. If you just want to talk about general hurr durr and don't even know what you wanna talk about, then you're just another retard.

>> No.4855859

>>4855843
=! =/= !=

>> No.4855865

>>4855843
Actually I don't think we know that until someone proves NP=!P.

>> No.4855874

>>4855857
Well, but having terms for subdomains of transhumanism but no term for the overarching concept would be retarded.

It's just a word, bro

>> No.4856262

>>4855874
It's a word used by retards. That means a non-retard looking for serious discussion doesn't use it.

>> No.4856297

>>4856262

hurr durr

>> No.4856306

>>4856297
Indeed. That's what you sound like.

>> No.4856962

I will require a new respiratory system at some point. Are stem cells this good? Estimated time of availability?

>> No.4856964

Kinzie Kenner as a Doctor.

>> No.4856968

The woman in the picture is a pornstar.

>> No.4856977

>>4856968
>>4856964
I've seen this scene by the way, there is a guy who complains about pain in his "penal area" (or something like that) and like the medical professional she is, she decides to make him feel better.

>> No.4856978

This!!

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/08/11/draco-drug-could-cure-almost-any-virus_n_924435.html

I want this!!

>> No.4856981

>>4856977
>>4856968
>>4856964
What happens if a sun made of pornstars collides with a sun made of westboro baptists?

>> No.4856989

>>4856981
wut

>> No.4856993

Cancer vaccine in 2020

Book it

>> No.4857005

>>4856964
She has a great scene where she is a schoolgirl, I'm going to go fap now.

>> No.4857011

>>4855612
>>4855607
>>4855603
>>4855564
>>4855569
>>4855567

fuck you OP
I actually wanted to know the answer to your question
All I got were comments about your picture

>> No.4857017

Women are equal and deserve respect.

Just kidding, they should suck my dick.

>> No.4858482

>>4857017
Goddamnit, why is /sci/ so sexist?

>> No.4858639
File: 372 KB, 513x709, photo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4858639

This thread took a weird turn
>pic unrelated but I'll still leave it here

>> No.4858647

WHEN I GO TO GET A COLONOSCOPY AROUND 2040ISH WILL THEY HAVE TECHNOLOGY THAT MAKES IT SO THEY DON'T HAVE TO STICK A TUBE UP MY BUTT TO SEE UP THERE?

>> No.4858654

>>>/pol/
>>>/b/

>> No.4858671

>>4858647
they already have the technology, they just stick the tube up there for laughs

>> No.4858682

>>4858647
Because the tube up your ass is cheaper and your cheap ass didn't choose the more expensive, less-tube-up-the-ass clinic.

>> No.4858686
File: 324 KB, 395x385, 1339247891281.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4858686

Nuclear medicine.

>> No.4858754

>>4855874
You could just say along the lines of what >>4855772 mentioned and just say biomedically engineered beings. or something like that. While I understand your thinking, to others, transhumanism sounds like something is the New Age section of Barnes and Noble.

>> No.4858759

>>4858682
That "tube" costs about 35k. My dad was bitching because one of his fellow private practioners broke one and didn't realize how expensive it was until he had to pay 5k to repair it.

>> No.4858780

>>4858759
The use is still cheaper than the alternatives.
If you use up one tube per colonosopy, you might be doing it wrong and might profit from reading the fucking manual.

>> No.4858969

>>4858759
>I am the son of a butt doctor ridicule me now, please

>> No.4859060

I think we'll see a cure for ahlzeimers in the next 10-20 years.