[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

File: 28 KB, 577x435, wherever.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Thu May 31 23:01:48 2012 No.4738046 [DELETED]

[Reply] [Original]

Scientifically speaking, why are niggers regarded as humans?

pic related

>>	Anonymous Thu May 31 23:03:33 2012 No.4738055 because of jewish lies by the liberal media

>>	Anonymous Thu May 31 23:05:48 2012 No.4738061 That's not a nigger thing. That's a I was kidnapped at the age of 8, saw my mother and sister raped then I was forced to kill them, then I spent all my puberty years growing up in a military in which consensual sex was unknown and rape was abundant.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 31 23:08:47 2012 No.4738067 File: 50 KB, 637x451, magic.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZbZIK9Ce0yM HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA >magic >oh fuck HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>	Anonymous Thu May 31 23:10:18 2012 No.4738072 >>>/pol/

>>	Anonymous Thu May 31 23:10:48 2012 No.4738073 File: 177 KB, 487x349, violence.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>4738046 pic related in all seriousness, though, OP, you are a bad person and you should feel bad

>>	Anonymous Thu May 31 23:13:48 2012 No.4738080 >>4738067 Their beliefs are no more silly than other religious people's beliefs

Anonymous Thu May 31 23:15:02 2012 No.4738082

>>4738046
not sure, technically each human is different since we don't reproduce by binary fission, hence each human is it's own "race". The boundaries between what is a human and what isn't is pretty vague.

In evlotuion, it is said that humans and chimps came from the same ancestor, but at what point would that ancestor be considered "human-like" or "chimp-like". Would you be able to physically tell between the two? I doubt it, it takes many thousands of years for differences to show up.

Hence blacks and whites might look similar now, but given hundreds of years they might be shown to be part of a different branch of homo sapiens

>>	Anonymous Thu May 31 23:18:18 2012 No.4738086 >>4738082 We can interbreed, and have no chromosomal differences. We're the same species.

>>	❤♡❤♡❤♡{King of /sci/}❤♡❤♡❤♡ Blackman Thu May 31 23:19:18 2012 No.4738088 This thread is racist. It will be deleted!!!!!

Anonymous Thu May 31 23:23:18 2012 No.4738093
File: 52 KB, 1424x843, genetic tree.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>4738086
then where do you draw the line between homo sapiens and the next branch? Did the original node of humans and chimps had the same number of chromosomes or was it lower and that's where you draw the difference?

>>	Anonymous Thu May 31 23:25:02 2012 No.4738099 Michael Jordan is why douche bag.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 31 23:27:47 2012 No.4738101 >>4738093 >then where do you draw the line between homo sapiens and the next branch? When they can't interbreed anymore.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 31 23:28:03 2012 No.4738104 >>4738086 didn't the zebra and horse interbreed? (not donkey I know they can interbreed but the result is sterile)

>>	Anonymous Thu May 31 23:28:32 2012 No.4738105 File: 389 KB, 1300x654, 1324921215946.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] saged for irrelevance

>>	Anonymous Thu May 31 23:28:47 2012 No.4738106 >>4738093 speciation happens when two groups of individuals cannot reproduce in natural conditions lrn2 highschool biology

Anonymous Thu May 31 23:30:17 2012 No.4738108

>>4738101
so for "homo-sapiens 2" to survive and make a new race you not only need for the resulting child to not be compatible with the parent race but for him/her to find another compatible mate (ie: of the same new race)?

Isn't this insanely improbable?

>>	Anonymous Thu May 31 23:31:17 2012 No.4738112 >>4738106 see that's not a very good definition, what the hell are "natural conditions"

>>	Anonymous Thu May 31 23:33:17 2012 No.4738117 >>4738108 >Isn't this insanely improbable? No, because it happens slowly and gradually over time, there wont be an instant where child of a parent is a suddenly a different species.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 31 23:34:32 2012 No.4738119 Why do you equate rape with being primitive? Did you think those cartoons where the caveman hits a woman over the head and rapes her are historically accurate?

>>	ends in roland soup Thu May 31 23:35:02 2012 No.4738121 File: 7 KB, 243x207, images..jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YDEtMDmyFoo&list=HL1338521535&feature=mh_lolz

>>	Anonymous Thu May 31 23:37:32 2012 No.4738123 >>4738046 Africans are actually more human than non-africans. True story.

>>	Anonymous Thu May 31 23:38:17 2012 No.4738125 >>4738117 But doesn't this contradict the fact that you need the child to not be able to breed with those of the same race? Can you give an example of how this would realistically happen then?

>>	Anonymous Thu May 31 23:42:17 2012 No.4738129 >>4738105 >>4738105 >Doesn't understand that neanderthals are a subspecies of homo-sapiens lrn2evolutionaryhistory

Anonymous Thu May 31 23:45:04 2012 No.4738132

>>4738106
>speciation happens when two groups of individuals cannot reproduce in natural conditions
>lrn2 highschool biology
Highschool biology is a little like highschool history: everything that's not trivial is misleading.

Drawing species lines is a subjective process, and sexual compatibility is only one suggestive criterion for being the same species.

Think of all the asexual species. Obviously, there isn't just one rule to recognize distinct species.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jun 1 00:04:32 2012 No.4738173 >>4738125 There will never be a case where a child is of a different species, that's not how evolution works. You need 10 000s of generations.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jun 1 00:08:17 2012 No.4738182 >>4738173 wut about ligers bro? check and mate

>>	Anonymous Fri Jun 1 00:08:33 2012 No.4738183 >>4738105 Delete that retarded image.

Anonymous Fri Jun 1 00:11:47 2012 No.4738194

>>4738173
I don't understand what you mean by this. What's your depiction of how a different species appears? You have 10,000 generations each slightly different from the first, and then when you compare the 10000th generation with the 1st one, they should be incompatible, and therefore that makes it a different race now? Do I have it right?

Anonymous Fri Jun 1 00:13:48 2012 No.4738197

>Scientifically speaking, why are niggers regarded as humans?

Why? Would you ask that same question when "humans" begin to have a decently sizable population living and breeding exclusively in space and/or when our population begin to genetically engineer themselves?

>>	Anonymous Fri Jun 1 00:15:48 2012 No.4738204 >>4738194 >and then when you compare the 10000th generation with the 1st one, they should be incompatible, and therefore that makes it a different race now? Do I have it right? Correct.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jun 1 00:21:17 2012 No.4738217 >>4738194 oups mean to write "each slightly different than the previous" >>4738204 thanks, it's never explained simply in biology books or maybe I just got lost from all the huge blocks of text

>>	Anonymous Fri Jun 1 00:27:02 2012 No.4738236 Subspecies can interbreed. They produce fertile offspring. /Newsflash.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jun 1 00:28:03 2012 No.4738238 >>4738217 or maybe you're just retarted?

>>	Anonymous Fri Jun 1 00:33:48 2012 No.4738250 >>4738238 it's "retarded", and no I'm not

>>	Anonymous Fri Jun 1 00:35:33 2012 No.4738255 File: 81 KB, 900x805, 1291462838076.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Scientifically speaking, why are pit bulls regarded as dogs?

>>	Anonymous Fri Jun 1 00:39:32 2012 No.4738266 >>4738217 It might not of been explained clearly because there is always a middle ground. Look up wring species. A can mate with B, B can mat with C, but A can't mate with C.

>>	Anonymous Fri Jun 1 00:39:32 2012 No.4738268 >>4738173 polyploidy bro

>>	Anonymous Fri Jun 1 00:41:02 2012 No.4738278 >>4738266 *ring species

>>	Anonymous Fri Jun 1 00:51:47 2012 No.4738294 scientifically speaking, why is OP regarded mentally deficient?

Anonymous Fri Jun 1 01:23:02 2012 No.4738330
File: 369 KB, 691x618, 2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>4738046
There's no real technical definition of Homo Sapiens Sapiens. I mean there are elements which of course make it recognisable, but there is no consensus as to what technically make an organism be part of this species and what not.

Guess what, politics (in anthropology) can have a hand in this, since scientists themselves have political convictions about the impact of their consensus.

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]