Psychology and bias

[ad hoc name No.4693808]

Some interesting data here:
http://www.nature.com/news/replication-studies-bad-copy-1.10634
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2012/05/bias-in-psychology/

-

Thoughts? The proposals to fix it sound like good ideas. I think they need to go further and require that authors publicize their raw data for all research published. This wud allow others much greater freedom to check the data and the analysis.

[Anonymous No.4693825]

>psi
>expecting quantum physics
>interesting psychology instead
>still disappointed

[Anonymous No.4696011]

It seems like it's hard to intuit between bias and insight in statistical science.
Which is understandable, considering that some of the time, bias can be well founded.