/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.4689328]

choose your team /sci/

[Anonymous No.4689333]

/x/

[Anonymous No.4689335]

Jacob Barnett

[Anonymous No.4689336]

>>4689333
i meant choose a team to represent your board.

[Anonymous No.4689339]

>>4689336
/x/'s team appears to be unbeatable, what with Azathoth and all. The best science can muster is Oppenheimer.

[Anonymous No.4689340]

Team /jp/ was expelled for being overpowered.

[Anonymous No.4689345]

Aperture Science!!! I cant decide between GLaDOS or Cave Johnson.

[Anonymous No.4689346]

>>4689340
lol

[Anonymous No.4689347]

[Anonymous No.4689353]

>>4689347
can't delete a team.. you have to add yours.
Also, J. Q. Burnett...? why?

[Anonymous No.4689354]

.....Damn lemons.

[Anonymous No.4689365]

Gordon Freeman
Khan Noonian Singh
and Tycho Brahe was a bit of a badass

[Anonymous No.4689369]

>>4689347

SOLD

[Anonymous No.4689379]

Every group has one good person and everyone else is shit. Goku. The Flash. The Emporer. Asura. Azathoth. Megas. Jackie Chan. Lit kind of breaks this with Gandalf, god, and cthulu, then m<3<3t.

[Anonymous No.4689380]

> No Tesla
Sure is full of faggots in here.

[Anonymous No.4689382]

Bill Nye, Carl Sagan, Nikola Tesla

[Anonymous No.4689383]

>>4689379
X has SCP (all) and Azathoth

are you kidding me?!

[Anonymous No.4689392]

>>4689382

This.

Also, have /b/ pick a team.

[Anonymous No.4689395]

>>4689383
sure looks like /x/ wins

[Anonymous No.4689396]

>>4689392
/b/ is still arguing.

can someone make a picture with all the teams so far?

[Anonymous No.4689402]

GLaDOS, Stephen Hawking, Atom Ant

[Anonymous No.4689405]

Newton is a forsure on our team.

[Anonymous No.4689414]

>>4689405
but Newton cant kill anyone.

[Anonymous No.4689419]

I'm the greatest mind here. Obey.

FEYNMAN
VON NEUMANN
NEWTON

gauss is too much aspie to go here, einstein too passive and turing too gay. The ones above are more agressive,

[Anonymous No.4689422]

>>4689419
we need a none human

[Anonymous No.4689426]

Why doesn't the 4chancup team not get this much participation?

[Anonymous No.4689429]

Dr. Manhattan, Higgs Boson, Richard Feynman.

[Anonymous No.4689432]

Srinivasa Ramanujan
David Hilbert
Karl Popper

[Anonymous No.4689433]

>>4689429
What are we? /co/?

[Anonymous No.4689436]

Frankenstein, Guy Ben-Ary, Sergei S. Bryukhonenko

[Anonymous No.4689447]

>>4689433

Other teams have invincible faggots, goddamn it we need one too.

[Anonymous No.4689449]

>>4689447
>>4689447
This, we need to be smart.

[Anonymous No.4689450]

>>4689432


Fuck I love you for picking Ramanujan

[Anonymous No.4689452]

>>4689426
It does, we had a 200 reply thread when we picked the "theory ( a gauss)" guy

[Anonymous No.4689454]

>>4689436
Guy Ben-Ary, Sergei S. Bryukhonenko, Stephen Hawking

[Anonymous No.4689469]

Hay if /x/ can have all of the SCP foundation. Why cant we have NASA or something like that?

>Samefagging..... I still think Aperture Science i a good Idea.

[Anonymous No.4689472]

YES

[Anonymous No.4689478]

>>4689472
can you do a picture of all teams?

[Anonymous No.4689479]

>>4689472
LOL, Why the fuck not? Why shouldn't we control black holes?

[Anonymous No.4689481]

>>4689479
Or Higgs Bosons

[Anonymous No.4689482]

>>4689472

what? richard dawkins?

how's he going to stand up to goku?
maybe he'll beat god but I mean, c'mon, that's goku

[Anonymous No.4689489]

Jacob Barnett Qualia's Peak Oil Tulpa > Any other shitty character

[Anonymous No.4689491]

[Anonymous No.4689493]

>>4689491
where's /x/?

[Anonymous No.4689494]

>>4689489

A Fire Ice Sun is also very powerful

[Anonymous No.4689496]

guys guys guys!!!

thorium reactor
LHC
quasars

[Anonymous No.4689499]

Fixed

[Anonymous No.4689507]

>>4689496

thorium reactor
fire ice sun
math majors

[Anonymous No.4689518]

Nasa? What are they gonna do? We needed a sci-fi concept or a heavy hitter like Feynman or Tesla, instead we got an unfunded government agency.

[Anonymous No.4689535]

>>4689328
Here's an idea. We find the strongest team and pick our team according to their weakness.

I'd put money on /lit/, so Dawkins can stay.

[Anonymous No.4689537]

>>4689535
see
>>4689499
our team is superior by far

[Anonymous No.4689539]

Replace NASA with the multiverse

[Anonymous No.4689540]

>>4689535
/x/'s team is very strong too.

[Anonymous No.4689543]

>>4689499
lol /v/'s team is pitiful

[Anonymous No.4689547]

>>4689537
How do we counter Cthulu? Or rather, WHAT do we use to counter Cthulu?
>>4689540
That they are. Have you seen that Skelleton? What if it pops?

[Anonymous No.4689550]

>>4689547
Lol, but SCP and Azazoth is strong on their own they'll rip /lit/ apart

[Anonymous No.4689551]

>>4689547
Pops out is what I meant to say.

[Anonymous No.4689564]

All right, so we should get rid of NASA and add an infinitely intelligent AI. (Neuromancer anyone?)

[Anonymous No.4689572]

>>4689564
Could we throw in THE SINGULARITY?

[Anonymous No.4689567]

>>4689547
Anti-matter!!!.....and the black hole.

[Anonymous No.4689570]

I propose we use dark matter or blackholes or some shit, cause were the only one's bounded by reality comparitivly to the other boards

[Anonymous No.4689574]

>>4689564
No GLaDOS,

[Anonymous No.4689575]

homeworkthread?

[Anonymous No.4689579]

We should divide by zero.

[Anonymous No.4689580]

>>4689575
WHOSE SIDE ARE YOU ON?!

[Anonymous No.4689581]

We need Carl Sagan on there.

This is not negotiable.

[Anonymous No.4689582]

Carl Sagan, Black Hole, Supernova.

And we will win.

[Anonymous No.4689583]

instead of richard dawkins, carl sagan

instead of NASA, the singularity

a much better scientist
and instead of a few underfunded smart guys
an entire world of super-geniuses.

[Anonymous No.4689584]

>>4689581
Carl Saigon, Black Holes, x/0

[Anonymous No.4689585]

>>4689447
Gordon. Fucking. Freeman.

The guy defeated the Nihilanth with nothing but a crowbar, he's the only chance we have against Azathoth

[Anonymous No.4689587]

>>4689585
are you fucking joking?
go back to >>>/v/

[Anonymous No.4689590]

>>4689584
>>4689583
These are both pretty good.

Could we go Carl Sagan, x/0 and The Singularity?

[Anonymous No.4689592]

Sagan instead of Dawkins!!

Sagan did everything Dawkins tried to do, while remaining classy and sophisticated.
Much better to represent us.
Dawkins was just insufferable.

[Anonymous No.4689593]

>>4689590
Yes I 2nd this.

[Anonymous No.4689596]

>>4689590

I guess with this we can just say x/0 wins no matter what.

Who can tell us otherwise?

[Anonymous No.4689600]

>>4689590
>>4689590

i'm okay with this as well

MAKE IT SO

[Anonymous No.4689602]

>>4689593
>>4689596
>>4689600
YOU HEARD THEM! MAKE IT SO SCRIBE!

[Anonymous No.4689603]

>>4689543

I knew their shitty taste would be the death of them.

[Anonymous No.4689605]

>>4689602
maybe we should find some appropriate pictures?
anyone got one of division by zero?
or the singularity?
we could use this one for sagan
>>4689592

[Anonymous No.4689610]

>>4689587
Why not, if you're considering GlaDOS? He's got a PhD from MIT, and Black Mesa >> Aperture

well, it's your funeral.

[Anonymous No.4689612]

>>4689610
we're not considering video game characters.
that was one guy spouting nonsense.

[Anonymous No.4689613]

>>4689605
I can agree on that picture for Sagan.

Found this, but I'll look for more. Doesn't seem right.

[Anonymous No.4689615]

>>4689613
gimme a minute, I think I have something perfect lodged in my thousands of wallpapers

[Anonymous No.4689617]

>actual science threads get no posts
>shit like this gets + 74 posts and 10 image replies omitted. Click Reply to view.
pure proof /sci/ is full of underage edgy popsci teens

why the fuck do i keep coming back to this shit hole

[Anonymous No.4689620]

>>4689574
>>4689585
Seriously, we are not /v/

[Anonymous No.4689619]

>>4689615
eh, couldn't find what I was looking for, I had one that was human skulls encased in robotic parts, but it didn't seem right.

heres a link to something that might work though
http://thisrecording.com/storage/a%20technological%20singularity.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1325
117091180

[Anonymous No.4689621]

>>4689612
If we're restricting ourselves to real science and real technology, we lose. Even with nukes and Tesla, /x/ /lit/ /tv/ and /co/ will pwn us.

[Anonymous No.4689623]

heres division by zero

http://img291.imageshack.us/img291/1339/divide10.jpg

[Anonymous No.4689625]

>>4689617
for people like me who don't do that?

[Anonymous No.4689628]

We choose the greatest minds that have walked this earth

Gauss, Einstein, Von Neumann are possible choices. Others include Tesla, Euler, etc.

[Anonymous No.4689629]

lol I can see it now

>carl sagan disproves god!

>is attacked by goku

>world of super geniuses scramble gokus brain

>azathoth attacks!

>/sci/ uses divide by zero!
>half the universe destroyed!

[Anonymous No.4689633]

>>4689629
Azathoth already destroyed everything before you could push the "=" key

[Anonymous No.4689638]

Since /m/ has TTGL, shouldn't we just choose the most powerful things in the universe? Choose a huge star that undergoes a hypernova.

[Anonymous No.4689641]

>>4689638

The most powerful thing in the universe is either a concentrated ground-zero gamma ray burst or a black hole.

Beyond the event horizon, no force can resist a black hole.

[Anonymous No.4689644]

>>4689628
Einstein's too pacifistic. Tesla's too crazy to be reliable.

[Anonymous No.4689649]

>>4689644
Well Von Neumann certaintly would have no qualms about destroying everything. He did work on the atomic bomb. Imagine what he would work on if he was resurrected, given a perfectly functioning body and made immortal.

[Anonymous No.4689664]

>>4689644
I would want a crazy ass hallucinating genius that can make earthquakes and wireless electricity to fight with me not against me. Wouldn't you?

[Anonymous No.4689665]

>>4689628
Tesla as Chief engineer
Von neumann in conventional warfare
Gauss on R&D
we can't lose

[Anonymous No.4689685]

We need Dawkins so we can fight all deity-like players with atheism

[Anonymous No.4689684]

>>4689665

[Anonymous No.4689691]

>>4689685
He would be a powerful weapon (possibly the only ones that can destroy the deities), but he would have no other weapons or defenses

[Anonymous No.4689692]

>Tesla
>Sagen
>Bill Bye
>Edison
>Neil DeGrass Tyson
>Einstein
>Cave Johnson
>Gordon Freeman (obviously)
>GlaDos

[Anonymous No.4689710]

>>4689665
gauss: yo dawg if we run a huge-ass current through a bug hunk of metal perpendicular to a strong enought magnetic field, we can toss that chunk like a jordan's dunk.

tesla: shit nigga that's rad, i'm on it, time to bust a cap in some idiots. yo newie, stop strapping explosives to a can filled with explosive so you can throw it in the sky, detach the can filled with explosive with some explosive bolt and let the explosive fall on the badboys, we got some neat stuff...

von neumann's face meanwhile

*ze time vill come, oh yes it vill*

[Anonymous No.4689716]

[Anonymous No.4689724]

>>4689685
Dawkins is a jerk, and a poor speaker and writer on the subject. Sagan would be a better choice. Don't think I'd want either of them watching my back in a fight though.

[Anonymous No.4689736]

>>4689633
dawkins can prove he doesn't exist

[Anonymous No.4689738]

We need to pick a good logician in order to defeat the overpowered constructs that the other teams have. And not Godel because he would sympathize with the /lit/ team.

[Anonymous No.4689744]

>>4689736
No he can't, Azathoth isn't just a metaphysical construct, he has a physical manifestation somewhere out in deep space.

At lest Carl Sagan could design a space probe to fly there and see if he exists or not.

[Anonymous No.4689752]

I am dissapoint

[Anonymous No.4689759]

I propose a anti-matter canon
LHC
It can kill everything

[Anonymous No.4689760]

Mad Scientist, EK, and Violent Simians man

[Anonymous No.4689762]

>>4689738
Actually, on second thought, most of these guys seem to be powerful in a "screw logic" sort of way.

OTOH perhaps Cantor would be useful.

[Anonymous No.4689764]

Superman Prime wins. He can create universes just by thinking of them....

[Anonymous No.4689765]

Qualia
Tulaps
Peak Oil

[Anonymous No.4689766]

Jacob Barnett
Peak Oil
Sun made of ice

[Anonymous No.4689768]

> 3 lone scientists enter the arena vs. several gods and immortals
> /sci/ team disproves Gods; makes immortals adhere to laws of physics
> no fun allowed everyone goes home

/sci/ : 1
everyone else : 0

[Anonymous No.4689771]

>>4689764
We talking about fightning and destroying,not creating

[Anonymous No.4689773]

>>4689768
>>4689768
>>4689768
>>4689768
this

[Anonymous No.4689776]

Jacob Barnett of course.

[Anonymous No.4689789]

>>4689768

This

[Anonymous No.4689794]

>>4689768
you'd still have to deal with the mechas, Jackie, Chuck, and Moot.

[Anonymous No.4689797]

>>4689794
>emp

[Anonymous No.4689798]

>>4689768
The scientists wouldn't be able to make the immortals obey the laws of physics as we understand them, but they might be able to figure out what the laws that underlie their powers are. There's not much that you could do against God with science, although you can reduce his relevance. Reduce him to the Deist version.

[Anonymous No.4689802]

>>4689794
you'd still have to deal with Jackie, Chuck, and Moot.

[Anonymous No.4689811]

Team /lit/ is clearly the one to beat.
/x/ is strong but has the same weakness as /lit/
The right /sci/ team could possibly disprove their strongest players.

[Anonymous No.4689830]

>>4689811
Gandalf could be taken out by someone like Randi exposing him as a hoax (unfortunately scientists don't seem to be as good at this), but for God and Cthulhu this would be difficult. However the reason God and Cthulhu are difficult to disprove is also their primary weakness: They spend most of their time not doing anything. Sending a scientist to investigate Cthulhu might actually backfire by awakening him.

[Anonymous No.4689838]

We are going to fucking roll with
>Nicola Tesla
and
>Robert Oppenheimer
those mofos can take on anything.

and finally to ensure that we do not lose no matter what if it comes down to it, we bring out a fucking
>black hole
and wipe out everything!
gg


we cannot lose /sci/
(if it comes to the black hole we won't win, but at least we won't lose)

[Anonymous No.4689837]

Adrian Brody, Adrian Brody, Adrian Brody

[Anonymous No.4689847]

>>4689429
YES ! DR. Manhattan

[Anonymous No.4689852]

Okay strategy #2:

> A lone Carl Sagan enters the arena and captivates all contenders by talking about the vastness and beauty of the universe.
> Convincing everyone of the vast insignificance of war/fighting, they let their guard down as Carl offers weed as part of a peace pack.
> Albert Hofmann enters, laughing
> The weed was laced with copious amounts of LSD.
> Some freak out at all the horrific faces/monsters and commit suicide; others simply stand confused and defenseless
> Finally Richard Feynman enters, who decapitates the weak and uses their heads as bongos as /sci/entists everywhere cheer.

[Anonymous No.4689858]

>>4689838
The black hole would be effective against Cthulhu (hides his madness-inspiring geometry behind an event horizon) but wouldn't do anything against God. Probably good to have since scientific investigation would likely weaken God but strengthen Cthulhu.

[Anonymous No.4689863]

>>4689838
Replace the black hole with the LHC and I'm sold.

Black holes are cool and all, but LHC is more /sci/ related. It's not as destructive as a black hole, but we can use the LHC to hit our enemies with the highest energies ever created by man. Which is what I think science is all about

[Anonymous No.4689866]

>>4689858
Azathoth, however, eats black holes for breakfast.

[Anonymous No.4689870]

>>4689838
have nikola tesla using his teasla-beaton WMD, it doesn't work at all, but I don't think anyone will know.

[Anonymous No.4689872]

I think we must have Heisenberg

pic very related

[Anonymous No.4689876]

Ok I got it.

Ok then we keep Tesla as our DPS.

Also we can go with Carl Sagan to do some deity disproving, and awe inspiring paralysis.

and as a trump card instead of the black hole we could use a massive vacuum fluctuation which could wipe out everything even Azathoth.

[Anonymous No.4689888]

Tesla/Heisenberg/LHC or Tesla/Heisenberg/Black hole
Tesla/Heisenberg/Pulsar

[Anonymous No.4689897]

/fa/ here

Come on /sci/

Nuclear Bomb, Einstein, Sagan, even fucking laws physics themselves ARE IMPOSSIBLE TO BREAK.

[Anonymous No.4689910]

>>4689897
not einstein.
Also, I proposed Oppenheimer over the atomic bomb, he can just rain them down at will

[Anonymous No.4689918]

>>4689876

Yes.

[Anonymous No.4689928]

>>4689876

Putting an astrophysicist next to an something astronomical is going to be a distraction for them.

I say, keep Tesla & the blackhole.
But replace Sagan with Oppenheimer/Destroyer of Worlds.

[Anonymous No.4689933]

>>4689928
That's exactly what I had at first lol
see this:
>>4689838

[Anonymous No.4689972]

Most current picture.
/adv/ has chosen.

[Anonymous No.4689979]

>>4689972

/sci/ is best at arguing, this is going to go on all night

[Anonymous No.4689983]

Any objections to this?

[Anonymous No.4689988]

>>4689983
Nope.
Looks good, bro.

[Anonymous No.4689992]

>>4689983
I don't think even the might of cthulu could withstand Tesla...or you know, that black hole.

[Anonymous No.4690001]

>>4689972
btw: you seem to have left off /x/
so it's missing from here too
>>4689983

[Anonymous No.4690006]

>>4689992
Black hole is our Mutually Assured Destruction card.

[Anonymous No.4690004]

[Anonymous No.4690009]

>>4689992
/pol/ here, why the fuck would you guys choose "black hole"?

Black hole just gonna suck everything up and that's it. How can you even have a black hole on your team? For a science board, you guys sure are dumb.

[Anonymous No.4690008]

>>4690006
Yea but if everything is within it's confines then the black hole, as a member of our team, means we win by default.

[Anonymous No.4690012]

>>4690009
you're just mad because the jews wont beat it

[Anonymous No.4690013]

>>4690009
>Scientific phenomenon
>Not a valid /sci/ team member

Yea, na you're a cunt.

[Anonymous No.4690015]

>>4690009
>doesn't know about the schwarzchild radius
the notion that black holes "suck everything in" is overstated.

If the sun became a black hole right now, nothing at all would happen to the Earth's orbit and it would not be sucked in.

We can make a black hole as small as we want. All we gotta do is lure everyone into some section of the arena, get our guys outside of that region and BAM we put enough JUST the right amount of concentrated energy in their center and they all get compressed into an infinitesimal singularity

>advantage /sci/

[Anonymous No.4690017]

The universe is potentially a black hole, so could that mean we might have already won?

[Anonymous No.4690023]

>>4690012
>underestimating the Jew conspiring prowess

Seriously though I am mad because we were going to win until you assholes decided "LOL BLACK HOLE SELF-DESTRUCT"

[Anonymous No.4690018]

/int/ here

>black holes
>white

HUEHUE

[Anonymous No.4690020]

>>4690017
no.
get out of here with that pop sci

[Anonymous No.4690032]

>>4690023
Science is the mother of all things? Do you really expect a substructure of that to beat nature itself in all it's glory as formulated by the top minds on Earth, possibly the top minds in the cosmos?

It's science

[Anonymous No.4690034]

WAIT , how about we have ****division by zero*** on our team

[Anonymous No.4690035]

>>4690032
How did you not have any problems with Cthulu, god, and Azathoth?
But black holes rustle your jimmies?

[Anonymous No.4690039]

>>4690037
SHHHHH!

[Anonymous No.4690037]

>>4690035
Because with the power of the Jews and Ron Paul's ability to foresee the future we can successfully control the other teams and cause inner conflicts

[Anonymous No.4690040]

>>4690032
You have no full "control" over nature asshole, also you only have oppenheimer tesla and a black hole

[Anonymous No.4690045]

>>4690040
>only have oppenheimer tesla and a black hole
>only

[Anonymous No.4690047]

>>4690040
ONLY Tesla and Oppenheimer!?

THIS IS BLASPHEMY

[Anonymous No.4690049]

If the sun were replaced right now by a black hole of equal mass, we would just keep orbiting it like normal. You need to be close enough to be sucked in. It's a good way to deal with immortal opponents, but it doesn't destroy fucking everything like a bubble of true vacuum would. Could be used as a planet killer, though. You'd want a black hole small enough that you could conceivably move it around, but not so small that Hawking radiation would turn it immediately into a bomb.

[Anonymous No.4690056]

>>4690037
SHHH!

[Anonymous No.4690063]

>>4690056
>Jew-cartoon.jpg
idk why but i lold

[Anonymous No.4690065]

Please replace the current line-up with this.
Carl Sagan because he is the posterboy of /sci/, would disprove God.
The Singularity because FUCKING INTELLIGENCE.
The Black Hole for mutually assured destruction.

There is no "x/0" because that is stupid. It's equal to infinite. And even though that may be debatable, it's still stupid under any circumstance to put something like it; it's pointless.

[Anonymous No.4690067]

>>4690018
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tYz4-HqOtac

[Anonymous No.4690068]

>>4690065
>>4690065
>>4690065


this, we had a consensus long before these other losers crapped up the thread

[Anonymous No.4690074]

>Choosing mortal shit scientists and finite shit like black holes
>Not choosing an unstoppable force, immovable object and multiplication by zero (nullify everything).
>I SHIGGY DIGGY

[Anonymous No.4690075]

>>4690065
>>4690068
That's good too, but we are already getting hate from others because everyone has like living things as their characters and we have a black hole.
Putting in the the singularity is even worse because it's an event.
So we have 1 guy (Sagan), 1 thing (black hole), 1 event (singularity)

ppl will shit on us.

[Anonymous No.4690078]

>>4690065
> There is no "x/0" because that is stupid. It's equal to infinite. And even though that may be debatable,
People that obviously have been in this board for a couple of days shouldn't really pretend to belong here.

[Anonymous No.4690080]

>>4690075
bah, they're just mad because we have such fine things to choose from, and their stuck with sad frog and jews.

[Anonymous No.4690082]

>>4690080
well whatever, if they will allow it then I'm good with it.

I just don't want them telling us in a few moments that they have decided to disqualify singularity and black hole.

[Anonymous No.4690084]

I'D JUST LIKE TO INTERJECT FOR A MOOMENT, WHAT YOU'RE REFERRIN TO AS /g/ IS REALLY RICHARD STALLMAN + /g/!

[Anonymous No.4690089]

>>4690075
The singularity shouldn't be the team member. The team member should be a powerful AI capable of accelerating self-improvement.

[Anonymous No.4690091]

>>4690082
well, if they do that we'll just use a supernova and artificial nanobot neurons

[Anonymous No.4690098]

>>4690078
Not same guy but
Granted, I've only take Calculus at the high school level so far, but from my understanding "x/0" is something that those new to mathematics jizz over. In reality, it's nothing special, or at least not as special as some make it out to be.
>5/10=.5
>5/1=5
>5/.1=50
>5/.00001=500000
>Oh hey look we're approaching infinity

[Anonymous No.4690106]

>>4690098
That's called a limit.
The limit is NOT always equal to the actual value. Yes it approaches infinity, but it is not equal to it, it is undefined at that exact point.

[Anonymous No.4690107]

how does everyone feel about replacing Oppenheimer with Sagan?

[Anonymous No.4690110]

>>4690107
>>4690107

more effective at disproving deities and unscientific nonsense, less atomic bomb.

thats fine with me.
FUCK OFF GOD
FUCK OFF CTHULHU

[Anonymous No.4690120]

>>4690107
team /x/ is on there twice.

[Anonymous No.4690125]

>>4690107
Tesla for The Singularity

[Anonymous No.4690129]

Updated.

[Anonymous No.4690130]

>>4690125
No.

[Anonymous No.4690132]

>>4690129
>>4690129
https://boards.4chan.org/b/res/400171628#p400187479

[Anonymous No.4690134]

>>4690130
Fine.

[Anonymous No.4690135]

>>4690125
> replacing Tesla
Kindly leave and never return.

[Anonymous No.4690138]

>>4690132
Looks good to me.

Tesla, Sagan, Black Hole
bricks will be shat

[Anonymous No.4690139]

Teams so far

[Anonymous No.4690141]

>>4690132
ARGH fucking /tv/ leaving unclosed parentheses!!

WHY? It burns!

[Anonymous No.4690142]

A self-improving AI would be an extremely powerful team member. Even if you don't discover powerful new technology, you have the capability of doing really nasty things like threatening to torture simulated copies of opponents.

Plus Sagan flying around in an IRL version of the Spaceship of the Imagination with the AI in the computer and the black hole providing energy and thrust (via matter-to-Hawking radiation conversion) makes for a very compelling team.

[Anonymous No.4690144]

>>4690139
> Oppenheimer instead of Sagan
>I think not

[Anonymous No.4690145]

>>4690142
i like that, our ai hijacks ttgl uber bot, and we win with storytimepowers

[Anonymous No.4690146]

>>4690142
with sagans insight as guidance, Tesla would be able to build that AI, and more.

[Anonymous No.4690147]

>>4690144
Someone's trying to push a fake /x/ team, and is messing everyone up.

[Anonymous No.4690152]

>>4690139
They posted the current one already on /b/ and it includes Sagan instead of Oppenheimer.

>pic related

I think they are both good choices but reading the comments it seems that Sagan is getting much more support, so I think this is the most up to date image

[Anonymous No.4690151]

>>4690147
>Sagan
>fake

are you fucking serious?

[Anonymous No.4690156]

>>4690152
fuck yeah Sagan.

he'll shit all over your gods and folk tales
/x/ doesn't stand a chance
or /lit/

[Anonymous No.4690157]

>>4690152
no this isn't it
/x/ changed Skelleton to Slendy

>pic related

[Anonymous No.4690159]

updated with team /g/

[Anonymous No.4690158]

>>4690152
Are you sure we can't have the Singularity?

[Anonymous No.4690162]

>>4690158
I think it might be pushing it,

two extremely brilliant scientists working in tandem and a fucking black hole?
I think that's fine

[Anonymous No.4690163]

>>4690158
well if we had the singularity AND black hole then who will the technological singularity apply to? We would only have 1 guy.
That's a huge vulnerability, if they defeat our 1 guy then the singularity is useless.

[Anonymous No.4690164]

Hm. Wonder what /b/'s team will be.

/sci/'s team should be General Relativity, Electromagnetism, and the Standard Model.

[Anonymous No.4690165]

>>4690163
So the only real question I think is:
>black hole
>technological singularity
pick one

[Anonymous No.4690166]

>>4690164
lol i don't think /b/ will decide on anything.

Newfags, medfags and oldfags are arguing and every post has his own opinion

[Anonymous No.4690167]

>>4690166
In the end they may just do first dubs gets the pick.

[Anonymous No.4690168]

>>4690165
Well, can't 'The Singularity,' theoretically, know how to create multiple black holes?

[Anonymous No.4690169]

>>4690167
loll, yeah or the rest of the boards will end up with 10+ versions of /b/'s team

[Anonymous No.4690170]

>>4690167
Not because moot took out dubs and trips of /b/, to stop the /b/tards from playing retarded get games.

[Anonymous No.4690171]

>>4690170
they can get 000 though

[Anonymous No.4690178]

Most of their other boards' teams are made up of imaginary friends.

/sci/ could just be Critical Thinking and Evidence.

[Anonymous No.4690181]

/fa/'s update

[Anonymous No.4690182]

>>4690181
Vps update

[Anonymous No.4690185]

>>4690182
>ditty used transform on black hole

[Anonymous No.4690187]

>>4690182
>ditto used transform on black hole

[Anonymous No.4690186]

>>4690178
/sci/'s troll team:
critical thinking, peak oil, and heat death

[Anonymous No.4690188]

final so far

[Anonymous No.4690189]

>>4690182
CHAOS DUUUUUUUUUUUUNK!

[Anonymous No.4690191]

>>4690188
You accidentally went back to Oppenheimer

We had Sagan

[Anonymous No.4690192]

>>4690191
sorry, about that. can you fix it?

[Anonymous No.4690195]

>>4690188
fixed for you
put sagan back
>>4690191

NICE TRY /lit/ !!

[Anonymous No.4690198]

>>4690195
>>4690192
forgot the pic

[Anonymous No.4690202]

>>4690198
you forgot /vp/'s and /fa/'s updates

also /b/ changed, for the 10th time

[Anonymous No.4690200]

lol /b/
>megagiganiggawatt

[Anonymous No.4690213]

updated with /vp/'s and /b/'s updates

[Anonymous No.4690215]

>>4690213
forgot picture

[Anonymous No.4690219]

This re-re-resaving and overall disorganization is really fucking everything.

Here, a template - put the 200x200 pics there. The font used is Sans (or Verdana). I'll post this in all boards that I see a Battle Royale thread.

[Anonymous No.4690220]

>Black hole
Really, /sci/? What's it gonna do?
We need Empiricism on our team to beat God. Also the Strong Nuclear Force to make everything else fall apart.
Or maybe just Vacuum Energy Shift to wipe the battlefield.

[Anonymous No.4690222]

>>4690215
/lit/ redid theirs.

[Anonymous No.4690224]

>>4690219
too late

[Anonymous No.4690231]

>>4690222
>>4690222
im calling bullshit

[Anonymous No.4690245]

>>4690222
trolll

[Anonymous No.4690255]

So I heard that /jp/ got banned? What's that about?

[Anonymous No.4690260]

>>4690255
because of Desu lol

[Anonymous No.4690268]

Nazi superscience death-robot

[Anonymous No.4690280]

If we substitute a self-improving AI for the black hole, we can make it a simulation of a third scientist/mathematician.

[Anonymous No.4690295]

>>4690280
Why emulate a human scientist when we've got a machine with far greater capacity to think?

[Anonymous No.4690307]

>>4690295
creativity to help randomize ideas
or endless loops could develop

[Anonymous No.4690322]

hai guys

[Anonymous No.4690327]

>>4690245
>>4690231
Not at all, my trips speak Truth.
We wanted the Holy Joyce triumvirate from the start.

[Anonymous No.4690328]

>>4690327
>>>/lit/2645355

[Anonymous No.4690365]

HomoTesla

[Anonymous No.4690366]

honestly, Carl Sagan could disprove all the fictional characters and a black hole takes care of the rest

[Anonymous No.4690434]

Von Neumann nanomachines (aka "grey goo". These, possessing group AI, spread across the universe exponentially as long as there is energy available. All our opponents do not increase in strength over time, which means their reduction of the nanobots' numbers is linear and will go to zero relative to the overall population. Being post-singularity, they can also improve themselves and easily contain all human beings currently alive).

Dark energy harvesters (energy is not conserved at scales of megaparsecs, since vacuum energy appears out of the blue. An extremely long machine, with both ends tied to two different gravity wells, could harvest that energy for free and eternally. Therefore the society of nanobots would be eternal as well as as large as the universe/multiverse).

Quantum-gravity-spacetime-fluctuations-to-macroscopic-general-relativistic wormhle generator (Gives us the capacity to go to any 3+1 spacetime event - to travel to different universes, across time and space and possibly even to different laws of physics).

With these things we would be lords of all space and time in all universes in existence for a eternity. Eventually and inevitably, everything that exists will have been converted into nanomachines which simulate billions of universes inside them, of which we are the gods if we choose to exist as individuals at all. And in that world we have created, it would take the tiniest minute speck of boredom to destroy all opponents listed here, or to create them for real in this simulated world. All of this would happen retroactively instantaneously at all points in existence, so nothing which exists can stop it. Therefore we win.

[Anonymous No.4690437]

>>4689692
>Cave Johnson
>Gordon Freeman (obviously)
>GlaDos
Stop filling this team with /v/-related characters, god damnit. We already have Sagan, The Singularity, and X/0

[Anonymous No.4690438]

>>4690322
Fucking this.

Needs more stark.

[Anonymous No.4690474]

>>4690434

Ha ha why do Earth apes assume machinic cognition will invariably be controlled by the turing cops? This stupid speak of Earth apes being lords and masters of the universe is something that should be inherently repulsive let alone counter factual to possible evolution of matter.

[Anonymous No.4690530]

I thought The Singularity was the entire human population working together and this is the reason it would be disqualified

[Anonymous No.4690557]

dropping sagan for oppeheimer

LOLWUT

[Anonymous No.4690587]

So what happened in the Battle Royale?

What was /sci/ team? or was /sci/ too late to get in the game?

[Anonymous No.4690673]

>>4690557
WTF
Not dumping that useless asspie queer Tesla instead.
Sagan ftw

[Anonymous No.4690688]

Black hole, Supernova, LHC

Don't tell me they're not /sci/ related

[Anonymous No.4692073]

The scientific method, logic, and math

But that's close to being overpowered, isn't it?

[Anonymous No.4692094]

>>4690688
that's supergay. Definite NO.

[Anonymous No.4692099]

Death, the destroyer of worlds.

[Not Columbo No.4692101]

Costanza
anyone?

[Anonymous No.4692111]

>>4692101
if i roll a 7 then costanza makes the team if not he doesn't

[Not Columbo No.4692119]

>>4692111
>2012
>Rolling
>300k starting
>ISHYDDT

[Anonymous No.4692127]

>>4692119
>not getting doubles
>2011

[Anonymous No.4692131]

I present a champion.

Messier 87 AKA NGC 4486 AKA Virgo A


A supergiant elliptical galaxy with a AGN; Active galactic nuclei. Outputting a positively ridiculous beam of lethal energy through lightyears(at least 5000 lightyears!) of space, it's supermassive central black hole is a true beast in pretty much any physical metrics there ever was.

Pic related. We'd probably be fucked if it pointed our way.

[Math300K !BeGauss9DU No.4692132]

Math guy where?

[Anonymous No.4692142]

Nuclear fusion? Anyone?

[Not Columbo No.4692145]

>>4692127
>2012
>wanting doubles

[Anonymous No.4692149]

>>4692145
>2011
>my post ends in 6

[Not Columbo No.4692152]

>>4692149
>2012
>being a /b/tard

[Anonymous No.4692158]

>>4692152
my keyboard was upside down i meant 9

[Not Columbo No.4692166]

>>4692158
>2012
>Not implying
>???

[Anonymous No.4692185]

Is this a Costanza thread?

[Anonymous No.4692189]

>>4692166
>calling green text implying
>2011

[Anonymous No.4692199]

[Not Columbo No.4692204]

>>4692189
>Implying you didn't just imply with greentext
>2012

[Anonymous No.4692202]

>>4689776
THIS

also pic related

[Anonymous No.4692229]

>>4692204
>implying your implying i implied that i implied anything by green texting

[Not Columbo No.4692237]

>>4692229
>Implying implications that I didn't imply
>2012