[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 81 KB, 960x540, 528748_403031666384517_367116489976035_1318987_905762174_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4635550 No.4635550 [Reply] [Original]

>2012
>this kinda shit
>still thinking of humans in terms of either substance or soul

I, as part of the scientific community, can't stand it and really think it's a rather negative influence. This is probably how it feels to be some *honest* christian who tries his best and then turns on the tv to see tele-evangelists.

what can I do?

>> No.4635559

Stop being a Christian.

>> No.4635574

>>4635559
>LOL I TRULL U!

.1/10

but u sort of prove my point. religious community usually can't think of the human without a soul, even though there's no such thing. scientific community usually resorts to thinking that we as humans are substance, which we are not. our bodies are, but we are not simply our bodies.

>> No.4635589

Go read a poem or a good novel (Tolstoy). Even Complexity: A Guided Tour will shut your ignorant mouth.

Atoms isn't everything.

>> No.4635590

>>4635574
>but u sort of prove my point.
No, I don't. At all. My post was entirely unrelated to your point. You know what? I fucking hate your kind. I fucking hate people who say stupid shit, and when you respond in an appropriately equally stupid way, claim that this somehow proves their shitty point. No, it fucking doesn't. If anything, it demonstrates that stupid shit provokes more stupid shit.

>> No.4635596

>>4635550

Shit, all buildings are made out of bricks! Bricks are everywhere and sometimes they are even reused and buildings renovated. God damn, buildings have 200 year old bricks! Reincarnation of bricks, man. Who the fuck is architect and why do people still talk about him?!

Bricks is the real shit!

>> No.4635610

>>4635590
>rustled.jpg
ohmahgaw lol! my point is getting overloaded by you continuing to prove it!

>> No.4635619

This is now a carrier advice thread

>PhD in Theoretical Mathematics
>Any job I want
>300k starting

>> No.4635620

>>4635590
>ad hominem
>ad hominem
>ad hominem

you're retarded

>> No.4635628

>>4635619
you will be replaced by indians who can work for 1/4 of the cost within a decade.

>> No.4635636

>>4635628

You think Indian PhD >= US PhD?

In my experience China's PhD << US PhD.

Because China produces shitty research in terms of novelty and quality.

>> No.4635640

>>4635636
In mathematics you can objectively state whether a proof is correct or not.

>> No.4635649
File: 126 KB, 1024x1482, dfd-1 copy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4635649

>>4635620
You're welcome.

>> No.4635651

>>4635649
"You're a faggot" is a valid argument now?

>> No.4635655

>>4635651

>"You're a faggot" is a valid argument now?

It's an insult. But when someone says it's "ad hominem", the person is clearly a faggot for not knowing the difference. In which case "You're a faggot" is simply stating an evidential fact.

>> No.4635656

>>4635651
Since when was it not a valid argument? You're in the minority here.

>> No.4635659

>>4635655
So you're saying that "you're a faggot" belongs in a science or math discussion? How often have you seen people do this in your university courses?

>> No.4635664

>>4635659
Surprisingly often.

>> No.4635672

>>4635651
No, it's an insult, hence the text in the upper right corner.