[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 77 KB, 701x999, barnett.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4625365 No.4625365 [Reply] [Original]

I think we've all seen Jacob Barnett's TED talk by now:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S4DaetCZ5v8#!

I found it quite disappointing, because he only talks about general things like learning and being a genius.

Is there any video where he talks about his actual research?
I'd like to see what exactly he has achieved scientifically.

>> No.4625368

just google it, idiot

>> No.4625369
File: 48 KB, 919x715, 1324565674.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4625369

>yfw this kid accomplishes nothing because of his shit attitude towards the scientific method

>> No.4625371

>>4625369
>implying the scientific method isn't outdated

No scientist gives a fuck about the scientific method anymore today.

>> No.4625375

>>4625371

Sadly you're correct. Scientists know that following the money is better girding them to survive, but following the money isn't the scientific method. The money is driving out the science. That's another important reason why the West is a falling empire.

>> No.4625401

>>"Scientific method is outdated"
>>Has never been in a real lab before.

>> No.4625410

>>4625375
The money can drive the direction of science but that doesn't mean that scientists aren't using the scientific method... lol

Sometimes /sci/ shines... Other times it's a full-out retard fest.

>> No.4625415

Perhaps another name lost forever in the list of premature geniuses.

>> No.4625416

>>4625401
>implying science happens in labs

>> No.4625423

>>4625416
Implying that science doesn't happen in labs.

>> No.4625442

>>4625375
>>4625371
Do either of you actually know what the scientific method is?

>> No.4625452

>>4625442
Yes, it's an outdated concept. Only old fashioned retards think standing in a lab and doing experiments is the only form of science. When I use logic to disprove religious shit of creationist retards, I'm doing more for science and for the advancement of humanity than any autist in a lab.

>> No.4625458

>>4625452


Oh.

Wow.

Hang on guys, I'm going to need to choose my reaction face carefully for this one.

>> No.4625465

>>4625452
No, go on, tell me what it is and how it's outdated.

>> No.4625468
File: 7 KB, 158x153, mario.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4625468

>>4625452

This will have to do for now.

>> No.4625473

>>4625452
>ITT failed his degree and was kicked out of lab

>> No.4625475

>>4625473
>he never been to lab in first place

>> No.4625479
File: 47 KB, 660x432, 1335300819158.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4625479

>>4625452
Holy FUCK. Is this what /sci/'s become?

>> No.4625483

>>4625452
>>Implying that using logic to disprove religitards is a form of science???

Must be a philosophy major. My condolences.

(Also good to see that I knew you never stepped foot in a lab before... With your level of intelligence I wouldn't allow you into the building let alone near any of the equipment.)

>> No.4625488

>>4625483
>implying atheism is not science

>> No.4625489

>>4625365

ITT: professionals taking the time to have a discussion with people who clean toilet bowls for a living

>> No.4625496

>>4625488

Well actually, it's not. It's a product of science.

Why don't you tell me what the scientific method is without googling? You have all of two minutes to summarize, no difficulty for somebody with enough understanding of it to discard it outright.

>> No.4625501

>>4625488
Nigga either you TROLLIN' or you straight up clean toilets at KFC for a living.

>> No.4625507

>>4625496
There, you retard: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method
You must be in highschool not to know what the scientific method is.

>>4625501
Did I hurt your fairy tale beliefs, creationfag?

>> No.4625509

>kid makes a few "deep" statements
>helicopter mom won't shut up about how smart her kid is
>everyone says "yeah he sure is smart" because they don't want to set her off
>kid believes the lie
>his entire life is now set with impossible goals
>as he gets older he realizes what a pile of shit he's in
>crashes hard, drops out of school, addicted to drugs
>media does a report on how genius leads towards drug abuse

>> No.4625515

>>4625507

I was rather hoping for something in your own words, something that also would refute my statement of atheism not being a science.

Which it is not. And nobody on this board is a Christian. You're just a dumbass.

>> No.4625517

>>4625507
>>4625507
Confirmed for troll. Can't even summarize the scientific method, has to run to mommy wikipedia for answers.

>> No.4625521
File: 289 KB, 1920x1080, Tom-Cruise-Laughing-Face-Closeup.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4625521

>>4625507
>>Implying that those who don't think atheism is a form of the scientific method are creationists

LOOOL

>> No.4625525

>>4625507
He didn't ask yo what google thought it was he asked you what you though it was and what could be wrong with it?

So what's wrong with it then, why is it outdated?

>> No.4625526

>>4625515
>nobody on this board is christian
Tell that to all the religitards who come here to deny evolution (a FACT).

>>4625517
>hhhhhhhhhhhuuuuuuuuuuuurrrrrrrrrrrrrr
Fuck off, retarded religionfag.

>> No.4625533

>>4625526
>calling evolution (or anything scientific, for that matter) a "fact"
>calling other people retards

>> No.4625535

>>4625526

Now he's talking like Violent Simian! Hey, why don't you tell me how the human race is a pack of shit eating monkeys?

>> No.4625537

>>4625521
Either you're atheist or christian. There is no third option. When you deny the truth of atheism, you are retarded.

>>4625525
The scientific method is for autists. A real scientist does science where it is important. By disproving religious nutcases and showing everyone how fucking retarded they are.

>> No.4625539

>>4625526
>Tell that to all the religitards who come here to deny evolution (a FACT).
They're trolls.

And seriously why is the scientific method outdated? You showed you can use google but not that you have a clue what it is.

>> No.4625545

>>4625537
>Confirmed for troll.
You had me there for a minute.
4/10

>> No.4625546

>>4625537
>either your atheist or Christian
>implying thousands of other religions don't exist

>>4625537
>being an EDGY ATHEIST
>calling other people autists

>> No.4625547

>>4625539
Religionfags are not trolls. They are seriously that retarded to not believe in evolution.

>> No.4625551

>>4625537

just answer the fucking question before we start hitting the report button. Do you know, what a scientist does? Yes, or no.

We'll be happy to correct you on the matter, because you seem to be confusing "science" with "proselytize".

>> No.4625554

>>4625546
>edgy
That's what you are. You have no idea what science is about. Religion is the worst enemy of science and needs to be eliminated.

>> No.4625557

>>4625554
>religion is the worst enemy of science
>Catholic Church responsible for some of the greatest scientific advancements in history, including the big bang theory.

>> No.4625559

>>4625551
>what a scientist does

A scientist advances humanity and disproves bullshit beliefs in magic.

>> No.4625560

>>4625537
>Either you're atheist or christian. There is no third option.
>The scientific method is for autists.

For someone supposedly advancing science with your super logic skillz you sure are good at logical fallacies.

And no, I'm not a Christian or religious at all. You're just retarded and butthurt that people are disagreeing with you. Go back to /r/atheism.

>> No.4625566

>At age nine, while playing with shapes, Jacob built a series of mathematical models that expanded Einstein's field of relativity
>At age 10, Jacob was formally accepted to the University as a full-time college
>world's youngest astrophysics researcher

Oh poor /sci/, you all so jelly.

>> No.4625568

>>4625557
Science = atheism. Religion has oppressed science for hundreds of years. Fuck you, retard.

>>4625560
It's all logic. Are you to dumb to undestand it? There is not sky wizard.

>> No.4625565

>>4625559
Please tell me how the existence of God has been disproven.

>> No.4625571

>>4625565
Is there any evidence for your skydaddy? NO.
Can everything be explained by science? YES.
There you go. Your magic shit doesn't exist.

>> No.4625573

i like how the entire topic of the thread has been completely derailed, just like every other board i visit on this site

>> No.4625574

>>4625559

No.

Flat out incorrect. I'd be amazed if you had managed to get through a Brian Cox book, that's how scientifically illiterate you are.

Those things happen *after* a scientist does their science. A scientist asks a question, and makes an observation, sometimes through experiment, to see if they can elaborate on that question. Or, if they thought up an answer to that question, they can see if that answer is true or false.

>> No.4625577

>>4625568
>It's all logic. Are you to dumb to undestand it? There is not sky wizard.

How the fuck does that relate to what I was saying?

Confirmed for troll.
>0/10 ain't even mad.

>> No.4625583

Guys, guys. Remember the Dawkins thread we had earlier?

Somebody said he never really saw a "mindless Dawkins worshipper" or something along the lines.

Guys, this guy got his idea from that. Trolling by impersonating a "fundamental atheist".

>> No.4625584

>>4625574
Get that boring aspie shit out. Spreading the truth is more important than finding it.

>> No.4625587

>>4625584
>spreading the truth is more important than finding it.

You realize you're no better than a religious extremist right? The process of getting the right answer is just as important as the answer itself.

>> No.4625589

>>4625583
There is no fundamental atheism. Atheism is believing in science (the truth) and fighting against retardation. Only christians can be fundamenatlists.

>> No.4625590

>>4625584
>>4625583
See? Exactly what I said. He's impersonating a "atheist worshipper" or something.

It's actuall rather amusing after the "impersonating a creationst" threads we get... all the time.

6/10 for creativity.

>> No.4625592

>>4625587
I am way better than religiontards. Solely by knowing that a god is logically impossible my IQ is higher than theirs.

>> No.4625594
File: 53 KB, 513x378, 1334687018789.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4625594

>>4625537
>mfw this guy thinks a religion that's only 2000 years old is the only one that's ever existed
>mfw this guy thinks christianity is the only extant religion


>>4625571
That's not how empiricism works and you know it. The existence of extranatural propeties and/or entities is unfalsifiable - science has no comment on the subject. I'm not defending religion here - just defending the proper use of empiricism.

>> No.4625595
File: 683 KB, 1366x768, bananas.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4625595

>>4625589
>does not know what atheism is yet claims to be one

>> No.4625596

>>4625584

Then stop acting like you have any experience or authority on what constitutes science. Having no comprehension of how we've disproved the existence of God, or the methods by which humanity improves itself. If you don't mind being only slightly less idiotic then the people you castigate, go right ahead. Just know that according to the rules of consequentialism and basic social interaction, a well rounded Christian will have a more positive impact on the world than your neurotic, zealous, self aggrandizing jackass self.

>> No.4625597

So thats what the ultra violet range of the autism spectrum looks like.

>> No.4625598

>>4625594
Unfalsifiable means wrong. If there's no evidence, your magic shit doesn't exist. Fuck off, your the typical retarded kind of tripfag that cancerously kills the board.

>> No.4625600

>>4625597
No, it's just a normal troll. He just found a new way to rustle atheist jimmies (or at least he thinks so).

>> No.4625603

>I think we've all seen Jacob Barnett's TED talk by now:
I am the guy who can't be fucked watching this video.
I am moderately interested if he has actually published anything.
If anyone would care to post a link to his astronomy publications I will mock them for you.
By publication I don't mean a link to Fox News.

>> No.4625604

Poor kid.

>> No.4625605

>>4625595
Atheism means knowing how retarded it would be to believe in magic.

>>4625596
Dawkins has disproved god. He's a motherfucking scientist, you better listen to him.

>> No.4625608

>>4625598
Guys, you see how he's mixing his trolling with scientific words in an attempt to prolong his trolling?

I give a 7/10. He has persistance.

>> No.4625609

>>4625600
>troll

Show me the evidence for your sky fairy. Spoiler: There is none.

>> No.4625616

>>4625605

Well, actually, atheism is just the disbelief in a God. There's probably atheist wiccans out there, or the more mystical sects of Buddhism which believe in no Gods, but spirits.

>> No.4625623
File: 38 KB, 799x444, butthurt.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4625623

>>4625609
>so edgy
Delicious. Please go on, I have some popcorn ready.

>> No.4625625

>>4625616
Those go hand in hand. Once you realise how stupid belief in a magical man in the sky is, you'll know that science is true.

>> No.4625629

>>4625598

from Merriam-Webster:

Definition of UNFALSIFIABLE
: not capable of being proved false <unfalsifiable hypotheses>

don't be a dumbass. "unfalsiable" is not the same thing as "wrong". Only someone extremely ignorant of scientific semantics would say that.

>> No.4625631

>>4625623
I asked you for evidence. Can you show some? No, you can't. Now fuck off and go be a retard somewhere else.

>> No.4625636

>>4625629
Unfalsifiable is magic. Only retards believe in magic. Are you a retard? Spoiler: Yes you are for being a religious tripfag on /sci/.

>> No.4625637

>>4625365
I haven't seen this video yet.
I saw the one of him on Glenn Beck.

The first minute of this video drove me mad.

>> No.4625642
File: 681 KB, 1047x849, ChrisLewicki.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4625642

>>4625631
>still implying you are not trolling
And I'm an asteroid miner.

>> No.4625644
File: 20 KB, 490x488, 1310116132176.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4625644

>>4625636
>implying valjean is religious
>mfw

This is pretty much the worst thread I've ever seem on /sci/. I give it a -pi/10

>> No.4625645
File: 12 KB, 90x90, shrugpinkie.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4625645

>>4625625

>Science is true
>Calling a verb "true"
>Thinking science is a noun rather than a verb.

I give up, you must be trolling. I always hold out on the hope that they aren't just trolling me. Good show.

>> No.4625646

>>4625642
Everyone here is an asteroid miner. For science! When we mine the asteroids, we find more evidence to disprove the sky wizard.

>>4625644
>defends the most retarded religious beliefs
>not religious
So your a shit tier troll? I hope you get banned.

>> No.4625648

>>4625644
It started bad and it got worse over time-.

>> No.4625649

>>4625644
Must post in the worst thread.
My OCD.

>> No.4625651

>TED
>TEDxTEEN

they aren't the same buddy. Please stop associating TEDx* with TED.

>> No.4625654

That fucking faggot calling everyone "religious" is nothing more than a troll in a failed attempt to make atheists look bad. Ignore him.

>> No.4625661

>>4625646
I'm defending the definition of unfalsifiability, all over which which you are egregiously shitting nasty peanut spinach diarrhea. go troll somewhere else.

>> No.4625657

>>4625654
>implying atheists aren't really that bad

He seems to be quite an average /sci/ atheist. Have you never read a religion thread?

>> No.4625664
File: 100 KB, 559x480, db3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4625664

>>4625654
You don't say?

>> No.4625667

bleh bleh bleh bleh, stop learning, start thinking. bleh bleh bleh bleh.

I hate this kid.

>> No.4625668

>>4625657

Not him, but I just imagined they attracted the /sci/ group several standard deviations below *average*.

>> No.4625672

>>4625657
Yes I have. ANd most people kept their cool.

I do not deny there are atheists which are borderline retarded.
But there are suprisingly few here on /sci/.

>> No.4625673

>>4625657
>He seems to be quite an average /sci/ atheist.

If you really think this then it means you don't know anything about this board. Go back to >>>/pol/

>> No.4625674

>>4625661
I told you that unfalsifiable crap is for /x/ retards. Go there, if your to dumb for /sci/.

>> No.4625679

>>4625673
I've been here much longer than you. Look at religion threads or even worse dualism threads. His idiocy is normal in there.

>> No.4625681
File: 31 KB, 383x409, 1334687240024.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4625681

>>4625674
>your
>trying to argue your own intelligence
>mfw

thanks, you guys. This thread might be the funniest thing I've read all day.

>> No.4625684

Thinking big is what he does

Meanwhile, Jake is moving on to his next challenge: proving that the big-bang theory, the event some think led to the formation of the universe, is, well, wrong.

Wrong?

He explains.

"There are two different types of when stars end. When the little stars die, it's just like a small poof. They just turn into a planetary nebula. But the big ones, above 1.4 solar masses, blow up in one giant explosion, a supernova," Jake said. "What it does, is, in larger stars there is a larger mass, and it can fuse higher elements because it's more dense."

OK . . . trying to follow you.

"So you get all the elements, all the different materials, from those bigger stars. The little stars, they just make hydrogen and helium, and when they blow up, all the carbon that remains in them is just in the white dwarf; it never really comes off.

"So, um, in the big-bang theory, what they do is, there is this big explosion and there is all this temperature going off and the temperature decreases really rapidly because it's really big. The other day I calculated, they have this period where they suppose the hydrogen and helium were created, and, um, I don't care about the hydrogen and helium, but I thought, wouldn't there have to be some sort of carbon?"

>> No.4625688

>>4625679
>>4625674
Nice samefag.

>> No.4625692

>>4625684
He could go on and on.

And he did.

"Otherwise, the carbon would have to be coming out of the stars and hence the Earth, made mostly of carbon, we wouldn't be here. So I calculated, the time it would take to create 2 percent of the carbon in the universe, it would actually have to be several micro-seconds. Or a couple of nano-seconds, or something like that. An extremely small period of time. Like faster than a snap. That isn't gonna happen."

"Because of that," he continued, "that means that the world would have never been created because none of the carbon would have been given 7 billion years to fuse together. We'd have to be 21 billion years old . . . and that would just screw everything up."

So, we had to ask.

If not the big bang, then how did the universe come about?

"I'm still working on that," he said. "I have an idea, but . . . I'm still working out the details."

http://www.indystar.com/article/20110320/LOCAL01/103200369/Genius-work-12-year-old-studying-IUPUI

>> No.4625693

>>4625681
You are unintentionally funny by being a retard who doesn't see how wrong and disproved your fairy tales are.

>> No.4625697

>>4625684
rgb dredging

>> No.4625698
File: 12 KB, 297x298, retarded.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4625698

>this entire thread

>> No.4625699

>>4625566
We're so jelly... But you know what would make us MORE Jelly? If you could show us one of his famous papers!

Oh man that would make us jealous.... Do it!!

>> No.4625700

>>4625684
...wat

Is this really what he does?

>> No.4625702
File: 19 KB, 400x360, laughing-woman-rs.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4625702

>>4625693
>mfw

>> No.4625703

When the little stars die, it's just like a small poof.

>> No.4625706

>>4625679
>I've been here much longer than you.

Really?. And how do you know?

>Look at religion threads or even worse dualism threads.

Mmm, let me guess. You are religious and a dualist?

>> No.4625709

>>4625697
Am I smarter than super genius boy now?
Can I have a prize?
Am I special?

>> No.4625712

>>4625706
I've been here nearly 24/7 since /sci/ has been created. And no, I am not religious.

>> No.4625715

>>4625712
A dualist then?

>> No.4625720

>>4625692

I am not a science major. I am not going for a STEM degree of any sort. I've taken a basic astronomy class. Basically a really low level physics class, so that Liberal Arts Majors can get some sort of science in their time at school.

Even still, as far as I remember, the Earth is not mostly made out of carbon. As far as I remember, it's mostly silicates.

>> No.4625722

>>4625712
Dualist retardation on my /sci/? Kill yourself, your so dumb you have no right to live.

>> No.4625727

>>4625692
...
I call bullshit. He thinks nobody thought about the formation of carbon atoms yet? And that's why the entire Big Bang Theory is false, according to him?

BullShit. With a capital S.

>> No.4625731

>>4625715
I see you're not better than him.

>> No.4625741

>>4625712
>I've been here nearly 24/7 since /sci/ has been created.

jesus, you must have a horrible life.

>> No.4625745

>>4625731
Nice insult.
The reason of why you find atheists stupid is because they disagree with dualism.

>> No.4625746

>>4625712
Do you not have a job or something?

>> No.4625751

apparently when the little stars die, it's just like a small poof, and for this, he is destined to win the nobel prize for autism

>> No.4625756

What an open and creative mind he has. He still has the chance to grow into a complete nutcase one day. Unless he breaks free from his parents clutches.

>> No.4625758

>>4625745
>proving me correct

>> No.4625763

>>4625745
Disagreement is not the matter. It's the intolerable arrogance and stupidity of confusing opinions with objective reality.

>> No.4625768

>>4625758
What a great argument my friend. We should keep doing this kind of intellectual debate.

>> No.4625771

>>4625763
Hi IQ fundie. How are you?

>> No.4625773
File: 30 KB, 358x361, laughinwhores3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4625773

>>4625768
>he comes to /sci/ for "intellectual debate"

>> No.4625777

>>4625773
>doesn't understand sarcasm

Hey, how is autism doing for you?

>> No.4625780

>>4625777
>doesn't understand meta-sarcasm

How's stupidity doing for you?

>> No.4625782

We'd have to be 21 billion years old . . . and that would just screw everything up.

>> No.4625792

>>4625699

So butthurt, he's the youngest astrophysics researcher ever, I think he said he hasn't published anything yet, but soon he will.

He's probably winning good cash working as a researcher and he's like 13.

Keep hating on the boy /sci/, I know someday you'll all be recognized and respected in your respective field. Just as Jacob.

>> No.4625793

>>4625780
There's a board for people like you.
>>>/b/

>> No.4625805

isn't this kid a young earth creationist?
doesn't this induce a very heavy bias in all this research, I.E, it will all be fucking wrong?

>> No.4625807

>>4625365
>>4625365
why has no one transfered to his school just to talk to this kid?

>> No.4625808

>>4625793
/b/ is a board for science and math? Unfortunately I have to agree. You'll find more mature discussions of science and math on /b/ than on /sci/.

>> No.4625812
File: 29 KB, 351x345, TrollWins.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4625812

>this thread

>> No.4625813

>>4625700
I second this. Really? A numerical anomaly in baryogenesis would disprove BBT? Gtfo.

>> No.4625818
File: 11 KB, 480x268, jake age 22.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4625818

>>4625792
he'll be the most successful adult at the autism grouphome for the disabled

>> No.4625824

>>4625808
Go there then. Nobody will miss you here.

>> No.4625829

>>4625824
Who are you to speak for the entire board?

>> No.4625840

>>4625829
I doubt there's much people on this board that consider /b/ to be a more mature place for science and math.
According to you this board is just a bunch of stupid atheists, remember?

>> No.4625842

>>4625805
Hence Zer0 publications.
Yep he is a troll for /sci/ but a good one. Usually something like this.

>He smartier than /sci/.
um nope
>U jelly
.
.
.

>> No.4625843

>>4625840
Show me the scientific contributions you made to this board.

>> No.4625845

>>4625843
Nice strawman.

>> No.4625853

>>4625845
It's a serious question. Prove to me that you come here for any other reason than shitposting. Because that's the only thing I've seen from you so far.

>inb4 tu quoque

>> No.4625862

William James Sidis—The smartest man who ever lived

At eight years old, William James Sidis proved his mathematics giftedness by developing a new logarithm table based on the number 12 and gave a lecture at Harvard University a year later. The child genius set the world record as the youngest person to enroll at the prestigious university at the age of 11 and graduated cum laude five years later.

Sidis is considered to be the smartest man who ever lived, by some, with an estimated IQ of 250-300.

Before his own experience with the terrible twos, Sidis had taught himself to read and shortly thereafter, became fluent in eight languages and wrote four original works of his own by the age of seven.

After an incredible childhood – or lack of it – adulthood was a struggle for Sidis and newspapers at the time reported that his “genius had burned out” due to the numerous obscure blue collared jobs he obtained throughout his life.

>> No.4625868

>>4625853
I'm more a reader than a poster, but I never "shitpost" as you call it. When I contribute to this board, I contribute useful scientific data, unlike you who came here to cry about "stupid atheists", insult other people and post silly pics like someone on /b/ would do.

>> No.4625872

>>4625868
Then show me your "useful scientific data". Obviously you didn't post them in this thread. Why did you post here?

>> No.4625880

>>4625868
>cry about "stupid atheists"

6/10

>> No.4625890

>>4625872
This is clearly a thread that has been trolled. I told people to ignore the troll and then you started crying about how the troll is the average "/sci/ atheist".
And of course I don't have a picture of every post I have ever made, nor I remember them all. You know what? I will let this thread die. I won't waste more time with you and your atheophobia.

>> No.4625893

Is his gf hot?

>> No.4625896

>>4625890
I don't know, if it's the same troll, but in every religion or dualism thread I see people posting exactly the same garbage like him. Riddle me this.

>> No.4625901

>>4625896
a) they're trolling
b) they are retarded

Pick any number and combinaten you wish.

>> No.4625902

>>4625901
That's the point. Only >>4625890 either doesn't get it or trolls.

>> No.4625916

>>4625902
Oh, okay. I agree.

>> No.4625926

>>4625916
So you admit that you've been a full retard all the time who can't properly read and understand posts? You better go back to reading reddit comics then. They are more on your level.

>> No.4625930

>>4625896
I don't know if you are talking about me, but I never post in religion threads.

>> No.4625935

>>4625926
>assuming you were talking to me
While I understand your rage, it's not ok to drag me into this.

>> No.4625939

>>4625930
>never posted in a religion thread
>thinks he's qualified to talk about religion threads on a meta level

Watch out, everybody. We're dealing with a full retard over here.

>> No.4625946

>>4625939
So I need to post in threads to see them?
Are you imbecile?

>> No.4625948

>>4625946
You need to actively discuss in them to experience how it feels to see logic and science being distorted to the maximum. You acknowledged that the "atheist" in this thread is a troll. Now consider a thread full of people like him.

>> No.4625950

>>4625452
either biggest troll or god help us......

>> No.4625951

>>4625950
>god

Fuck off, religionfag.

>> No.4625954
File: 297 KB, 1440x900, Atheism1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4625954

>>4625948
That sounds like a challenge
Must join in with some propaganda.

>> No.4625961

>>4625948
Religion threads happen very rarely, and when they do is usually the OP trolling, a couple of other trolls and one or two anons taking the trolling seriously. They do not reflect the opinion of the average /sci/ reader. And is not necessary to participate in a discussion to see how stupid it is, you idiot.

>> No.4625969
File: 143 KB, 1440x900, aGodrsp.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4625969

>>4625961
>Religion threads happen very rarely
nope
unless by rarely you mean frequently

>> No.4625976

>>4625961
Sure they don't represent the average /sci/ READER. But even if /sci/ hypothetically is full of rational and educated readers, it tells us a lot to see that most posts are made by total idiots. Yours is a good example. You have no science content to contribute to this board, yet you think it would be of any value to discuss irrelevant garbage in an immature manner.

>> No.4625983

>>4625969
A religion thread with a considerable amount of replies and that doesn't get deleted 15 minutes after being made happens like once in a month.

>> No.4625987

>>4625983
>dat newfaggotry

Is it your first day on /sci/ today?

>> No.4625989

his pub http://arxiv.org/abs/1108.6083
any physicsfag here to review it?

>> No.4625993

>>4625983
>once in a month

You mean ten times a day.

>> No.4625997

>>4625976
It seems you lack reading comprehension. Religion threads have very few (if any) non-troll posters.

>Yours is a good example. You have no science content to contribute to this board, yet you think it would be of any value to discuss irrelevant garbage in an immature manner.

Your imbecility is shining. You have no way of knowing what I contribute, because I, like most people do, post anonymously. Your insistence that I post on religious threads shows you do not know who I am.
The one who is shitposting is you.

>> No.4626001

>>4625983
I didn't have to look past Page2
>>4624903

>> No.4626009

>>4625997
I see what you post ITT. It is apparently lowest shitposter quality and allows to infer that you're not here for serious science and math. A serious science poster wouldn't engage in such worthless debates, neither would he post in such an immature manner.

>> No.4626010

>>4625896
Hey, why aren't you using your trip?

>> No.4626012

>>4625989
I browsed through the first page. Legit stuff. Has absolutely nothing to do with BBT though. It's condensed matter / low energy theoretical physics. Think Bose-Einstein condensates / super conductors / superfluids. The more practical and testable end of theoretical physics. What they did was investigate some stuff about a trick that shows that it is possible to relax a rather stringent mathematical condition that one usually imposes in order to make sure your formulae actually tell you shit that makes sense.

>> No.4626022

>>4626009
How is warning people about a troll bad for this board?
And how are you not a shitposter according to your own definition?

>> No.4626025

>>4625954
>type out clever witticism
>cannot into typography
>end up with an orphan
>derp.jpg

>> No.4626027

He's smarter than I.

>> No.4626032

>>4626012
Not the person who asked but thanks from me anyway.

>> No.4626036

>>4626022
You warned about a troll. I told you that this kind of trolling occurs often on this board and most likely is not always trolling but also serious retardation. Your response was a savage storm of insults. Tell me how this is a quality contribution to a science board.

>> No.4626045

>>4626036
You were the first one to give an insult, and you seemed completely immature in replying to the other poster who didn't understand your post. Get off your high horse.

>> No.4626051

>>4626045
>posting his retardation
>getting butthurt over rightfully being called a retard

You should really go back to reddit, if you're too sensitive for 4chan.

>> No.4626058

I still think he's not that smart. I could've probably done all that if I wasn't so lazy.

>> No.4626060
File: 22 KB, 589x532, 31324142141.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4626060

>You wake up from a nightmare about numbers and notice that something weird has happened
>You are in a race car bunk bed
>You have a 21cm penis
>You run to the mirror and realize you have transformed into JB

What do you do? Keep in my mind that you are a genius that has a 12 year old girlfriend and an abundance of baseball caps to wear backwards

>> No.4626062

>>4626051
See how you lack logic and reading comprehension?
You told me that I'm a shitposter for insulting you, when in fact you started with insults. Not to mention that the post in which you called me a retard made no sense.
And your "go back to reddit" shows you are someone that post in a board like /b/ or /pol/

>> No.4626066

>>4626062
>drawing wrong conclusions
>posting insults
>projecting being a shitposter

Please leave /sci/. You don't belong here.

>> No.4626068

>>4625969
lol God doesn't hate gays. He hates sin.

yea I'm a "creationistfag"

>> No.4626081

>>4626066
>drawing wrong conclusions

You told me that I was a troll that posted in religion threads, and then you said the ludicrous claim that you need to post in a thread to read it.

>posting insults

Your very first posts were filled with insults and agressive lenguage, which I replied accordingly. And then you called me a shitposter for using insults.

>projecting being a shitposter

Oh boy. This is precisely what you are doing.
Maybe you should leave /sci/

>> No.4626091

>>4626060
Yes.
A worthy post.
I think you are getting better at /sci/

>> No.4626095

>>4626081

0/10

No one can fail that hard at reading comprehension and logic.

>> No.4626098

>>4626068
Your West Bros disagree.

>> No.4626111

>>4626103
There is no point to make anymore. You confirmed for low tier troll. That's it.

>> No.4626103

>>4626095
You are so short of words that you resort to the typical "0/10" and then you copy my words in a failed attempt to make a point.

>> No.4626106
File: 426 KB, 1440x900, Athei2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4626106

>>4626098
damn I forgot to propaganda.

>> No.4626108

>>4626058
it's just...
shit he does is extremly boring.

>> No.4626118

>>4626108
Eh, extending Hamiltonians to non-Hermitian operators is kind of nifty, I guess. But then, that's what someone else figured out and he's just working in that frame work. Yeah okay, nvm, you're right.

>> No.4626123

>>4626098
yea well West Bro baptist church is retarded and is everything that is wrong with the christian church. Also, they hate soldiers which is even more nonsensical.

>> No.4626127

>>4626111
Your immediate change of topic shows perfectly that you have nothing left to say, because all your post are contradictory garbage.

>> No.4626130

>>4626127
Cool story, bro.

>> No.4626135

>>4626130
Maybe you are confused. This is the board you are looking for: >>>/b/
I will not waste more time with such an idiotic and immature person as you.

>> No.4626139
File: 485 KB, 1440x900, Respect.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4626139

>>4626123
At least those retards have the balls to stand up for their Big Book of Bullshit in its entirety. Some respect for the balls out warts and all approach.

>> No.4626142

There is no such thing as the scientific method. The many varieties of science (fields) use different methods. That's a good thing. Different methods are necessary to study different things, in general.

>> No.4626146

>>4626135
Other than you I'm here for science and math and not for shitposting.

>> No.4626149

>>4626139
you haven't even read the bible or else you'd know that they are interpreting it wrongly. Just like the crusaders did too. Bible says to pray for your enemies and those who persecute you, and west bro isn't doing that. In the bible it says to love everybody and treat everyone how you would like to be treated.

>> No.4626182
File: 138 KB, 656x1282, olrp1.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4626182

>>4626149
I tried to but I couldn't get past the bit where God punishes all humanity for ever in a pre-emptive strike. As in so that you do not eat this thing I will make you and all humanity suffer. Then I thought fuck this shit.
I am running low on propaganda.

>> No.4626188

Is /r/atheism down or something?

>> No.4626196

>>4626149
If you are suggesting that you know more about the bible than your West Bros you are deluded. Those fuckers can recite passage after passage word for fucking word. They know that book inside out.

>> No.4626206

>>4626182
lol it's deeper than that, but I'd like to stop talking about this. Cool thing about God is that he gives you the freedom to do whatever you want. And sadly some human beings just choose to do wrong and in the end he punishes them. For instance, Adolf Hitler chose to do wrong, ergo God punishes him for eternity. Hitler made a choice, and God was like "ok so you don't want to live with me for eternity, that's fine." *sends to hell.*

>> No.4626225
File: 104 KB, 428x271, Spiritual-Safety.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4626225

>>4626206
Really you give me hell threats.
You know I don't believe in hell right?
You know Hitler was a catholic right?

>> No.4626240

>>>/g/24520087
jacob barnett is a clone or b time-travelling trap

>> No.4626505

I haven't seen /sci/ so dense with shitposts since EK was still around.

Glenn Beck mathematically proved on national television that God created Jacob Barnett for the sole purpose of trolling /sci/.

The only published paper that has Jacob Barnett's name on it is the one where he was coauthor, and he was put there by the primary author of that paper as a method of trolling academia. I promise you that this kid is not capable of doing anything spectacular except being energetic and willing to forge his own path in some situations, although his massive unjustified ego will immediately compensate for any good qualities he may have had. Also unfortunate is the fact that he does not seem willing to catch up on existing literature, and that he confuses the words "schooling" and "learning".