[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 22 KB, 354x262, infinity.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4619146 No.4619146 [Reply] [Original]

????

>> No.4619154

Infinity+0
/thread

>> No.4619157

infinity

because infinity - infinity = zero

>> No.4619158

9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999
9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999
99999999999999999999999999999999999

>> No.4619160

9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999
9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999
9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999
9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999
9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999
99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999

>> No.4619161

the largest number in this thread + 1

>> No.4619164

>>4619146
Infinity is not a defined integer.

>> No.4619171

The length of my penis.
The inverse lenght of yours.

>> No.4619168

>>4619164
That's why he said "number" and not "integer".

>> No.4619176

Grahams number. Squared.

>> No.4619177

9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999
9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999
9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999
9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999
9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999
9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999
99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999
9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999
9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999
9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999
9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999
9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999
99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999
9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999
9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999
9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999
9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999
99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999

>> No.4619178

Graham's Number. To the Graham's Number. Plus one.

>> No.4619179

>>4619164
It's defined as Aleph. It's value is the same as OP's Mom's weight.

>> No.4619180

http://www.scottaaronson.com/writings/bignumbers.html

>> No.4619181

>>4619171
those aren't dimensionless numbers.
Retard.

>> No.4619183

OP's score on the faggot scale

>> No.4619189

>>4619186
Highschooler detected.

>> No.4619188
File: 960 KB, 500x500, universe.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4619188

UNIVERSE!!!! because its expanding!

>> No.4619187
File: 28 KB, 400x400, trollcorner.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4619187

Speaking of troll questions

f(x,y) = y^x^y
df/dy = ?

hardmode: Don't use any calculation SW. Then do.

>> No.4619186

>>4619168
Infinity is not a number either.

>> No.4619195

wat

>> No.4619196

>>4619187
Why is that a troll question? The graph of <span class="math">z = y^{x^y}[/spoiler] looks continuous and differentiable to me...

>> No.4619197

>>4619187
0

>> No.4619200

>>4619187
why is it supposed to be hard?

>> No.4619201

y = closest number
inf - x = y
x + y = inf
x + y - y - inf = (-y)
(-1)(x - inf) = (-y)(-1)
(-x) - (-inf) = y
(-x) + inf = y

i have no fucking idea

>> No.4619205

>>4619189

It isn’t, though.

>> No.4619212

>>4619187
speaking of which.
DO YOUR OWN FUCKING HOMEWORK

>> No.4619214

>>4619205
Go ahead and define "number". Then show me why infinity is not a number.

>> No.4619216

>>4619200
I didn't say it's hard.

Do it yourself, then lookup Wolfram results and compare the two.

>> No.4619224

>>4619212
>implying you need other people to do derivatives for you

>> No.4619217

>>4619196
Oh, I see... It's fucked for x < 0 and y < 0. Wow, that is one fucked up function. Looks like a fractal.

>> No.4619219

∞ - 0.000000...001

>> No.4619227

>>4619214
>hurr infinity is a number, prove me wrong
It is a not a member of the set of real numbers.

>> No.4619234

>>4619227
Oh dear son. He's going to pick up on the "real numbers", and say that wasn't what you claimed.

>> No.4619235

>>4619227
That's not what I was asking for. You said it's "not a number", you didn't say "it's not a real number". If you used the latter phrase, there would be no need to discuss. But since you now defined "number" as "real number", you are saying that complex numbers are not numbers. Probably you don't know what complex numbers are, because you're still in highschool. So please look them up before replying.

>> No.4619239
File: 118 KB, 579x1360, yxy.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4619239

>>4619217

>> No.4619242

>>4619239
holy shit

>> No.4619246

>>4619239
That is beautiful
how do you get wolfram alpha to do that?
Can you zoom in or out?

>> No.4619250

>>4619246
Yeah, WolframAlpha has basically all of Mathematica built into it. Just use the "Plot3D" command:

http://reference.wolfram.com/mathematica/ref/Plot3D.html

>> No.4619256

>>4619187
<span class="math">xy\;y^{xy-1}\;x^y\;log(x)[/spoiler]

>> No.4619259

>>4619246
Some features are only available if you pay in jew gold though.

>> No.4619265

>>4619259
Yeah, pretty much all the interactivity buttons link you to the Free Trial of Pro version.

>> No.4619624 [DELETED] 

>>4619214
>>4619235
> The word "number" is a general term which refers to a member of a given (possibly ordered) set. The meaning of "number" is often clear from context (i.r., does it refer to a complex number, integer, real number, etc.?). Wherever possible in this work, the word "number" is used to refer to quantities which are integers, and "constant" is reserved for nonintegral numbers which have a fixed value. Because terms such as real number, Bernoulli number, and irrational number are commonly used to refer to nonintegral quantities, however, it is not possible to be entirely consistent in nomenclature.
Hiding behind ambiguous context won't save you now. Numbers are integers, while _____ numbers are members of some set _____. Specify a well-ordered set that includes an infinity if you're going to request people use the distance function to calculate proximity to it from the other members.

>> No.4619629

>>4619214
>>4619235
> The word "number" is a general term which refers to a member of a given (possibly ordered) set. The meaning of "number" is often clear from context (i.e., does it refer to a complex number, integer, real number, etc.?). Wherever possible in this work, the word "number" is used to refer to quantities which are integers, and "constant" is reserved for nonintegral numbers which have a fixed value. Because terms such as real number, Bernoulli number, and irrational number are commonly used to refer to nonintegral quantities, however, it is not possible to be entirely consistent in nomenclature.
Hiding behind ambiguous context won't save you now. Numbers are integers, while _____ numbers are members of some set _____. Specify a well-ordered set that includes an infinity if you're going to request people use the distance function to calculate proximity to it from the other members.

>> No.4619636

God, you guys are all retarded.
The closest number to ∞ is 8.
Just look at how close they are.

>> No.4619646

1, it is just as close as 2, just as close as 800000000000000000000000000000 etc
>I don't realy know

>> No.4619651

I wrote a little program to find it out.

x = y = 0;
while (x==y)
{
x++;
y++;
}

It starts at 0 and then counts its way up to the largest number possible. It might take a while though.

>> No.4619654

infinity +-1/infinity

>> No.4619657

>>4619651
How long do you suppose? I need numbers, sir. I need accurate measurements. I cannot perform with "might take a while though."

>> No.4619655

>>4619146

Infinity is not a number. A googolplex [(10^100)^100))] is just as far from infinity as the number 1. There is no number that is "closest" to infinity, because any number you can think of, put in context with infinity, the difference between them is insignificant. I hope that answers your question.

>> No.4619667

>>4619655

my bad, way to many closing parens. I'm a wee bit tired.

>> No.4619668

Should this deal with a "when" instead of a which?

When is closest to infinity? All of it

>> No.4619678

>>4619657
It will take infinity - 1 time.

>> No.4619695

<div class="math">\infty - \infty^{-1}</div>

But you need to thing of the omni-supra-über-trans-complex set to understand this

>> No.4620039

>>4619695
> test
> teast

> test

>> No.4620443

Infinity - fractional infinity.
/thread

>> No.4620456

infinity-(1/infinity)

>> No.4620462

24

24 is the highest number.

>> No.4620464

give me a definite number you think is closest to infinity and i'll give you one that's closer

>> No.4620466
File: 24 KB, 400x300, dc.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4620466

>>4620462
I'd like to rescind my answer in light of this wise reminder.

>> No.4620486

FOLKS, PLEASE KEEP THE FOLLOWING DISTINCT CONCEPTS STRAIGHT IN YOUR MINDS:

NUMBER
CARDINALITY (OF A SET)
INFINITY

ALSO PLEASE REALIZE THAT CAPS LOCK IS COOL WHEN I USE IT, BUT NO ONE ELSE

>> No.4620495

>>4620456
>>4620443
>>4619695
infinity - 0 is still infinity

>> No.4620543

Isn't infinity the set of all numbers?

So wouldn't the nearest thing to all numbers be no numbers or nothing?

Meaning zero?

I'm sure my logic is flawed.

>> No.4621252

Every number has the same distance to infinity, that is an infinite distance. So in a sense every number is the closest to infinity.

>> No.4621262

>>4620543
It's not just flawed; it's completely meaningless technobabble.

As far as OP's question is concerned there is obviously no answer, and not even because he is asking which number is closest to infinity.

Even if he asked which number is closest to 1.4, it would be completely meaningless. For any number q that is arbitrarily close to 1.4 there is a neighborhood defined by q with an infinite number of points in it. Each one of those points is closer to 1.4 than q.

>> No.4621266

>which number is closest to infinity
>implying that infinity is a single number
lrn2 aleph and bet.

>> No.4621278

99.999999... of infinity

>> No.4621281

This one.

>> No.4621285

1

>> No.4621295

infinity - .0000......1
have the trolls taught you guys anything?

>> No.4621298

Infinity times 0.999...

>> No.4621302

this is a great fucking question

>> No.4621304

>>4620462
also, this

>> No.4621308

every number is as close to infinity as you can possibly be. except zero

>> No.4621318 [DELETED] 
File: 257 KB, 456x346, facepalm.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4621318

>67 posts and 4 image replies omitted.

>> No.4621339

>>4619187
Holy fuck, I'm trying to use the chain rule but I just cant set it up.

>> No.4621340

>>4621318

Posting a smartass comment after a lot of replies doesnt make you smart. In fact the question of far to complicated to understand specially for you.

>> No.4621368
File: 18 KB, 626x551, 1325283748692.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4621368

>>4621278
>99.999999...% of infinity

This is why I fucking love this board.

>> No.4621386

>> No.4621385 [DELETED] 

>>4621340
the question is fucking stupid, i was saying that im astonished that this stupid trollthread has so many replies.
at most i expected about 3 sage-posts all calling OP a stupid faggot.

>> No.4621394

>>4619146
Which infinity?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georg_Cantor

>> No.4621659

>>4619146
infinity - (1/infinity)

>> No.4621670

Graham's number. Beat that, bitches!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graham%27s_number

>> No.4621672

>>4621670
Graham's number + 1.

You're new to this, aren't you?

>> No.4621675

>>4621672
Graham's number ^ Graham's number then

>> No.4621677

Pi without a decimal point

>> No.4621680

Guys. Hey guys.

So - guys - I have an idea.

Alright, the closest number to infinity, guys, is, wait for it.

>Zero

>> No.4621744

>>4621680
That's the furthest. LOL.

>> No.4621786

Infinity - 1/infinity. Duh

>> No.4621792

>>4621786
No, sorry. x - 1/x is not the closest number to x