/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.4599796]

Hey Sci, Hard topographics from the Madeira Abyssal Plain in the Atlantic. The area within the edge detected lines is 100-200 feet lower than the surrounding areas. Could this be evidence of man made lakes and canals? I took these screen shots from Google Earth last year and enhanced them with
Irfanview. Then within weeks Google's data carrier added compression and you can not get the same detail as I was getting before. Pics related.

[Anonymous No.4599807]

This is the area in question. The next post will be of the South East corner of the 100 x 75 mile outermost rectangle.

[Anonymous No.4599810]

[Anonymous No.4599815]

>>4599796
>>4599796
>>4599796
>>4599796
totally looks like a map of a dungeon from an RPG.

[Anonymous No.4599816]

These are just artifacts from the scanning process.

http://www.pcworld.com/article/160088/googles_atlantis_discovery_explained.html?tk=rel_news

[Anonymous No.4599832]

Netherlands survey from 1984 points out the same pattern, the argument of artifacts is nullified by this study, which shows the same artifacts as fault lines. https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=gmail&attid=0.1&thid=12ebf622b93de5ca&mt=appl
ication/pdf&url=https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui%3D2%26ik%3Da549227760%26view%3Datt%26th%3D12ebf
622b93de5ca%26attid%3D0.1%26disp%3Dsafe%26realattid%3Df_glcfoqkf0%26zw&sig=AHIEtbQ2FVt0LvCZe4jlN
2C8HBxWVj1meg&pli=1

[Anonymous No.4599843]

There are no artifacts anywhere else like this in Google Earth, plus, lokk at the sources listed for the sonar data that include the NSA, and US Navy, so , how could more than two studies create the same artifacts? Only if they were done ate the same time with the same equipment.

[Anonymous No.4599846]

>>4599843
The rest of Google Earth isn't done with specialized deep-sea sonar.

[Anonymous No.4599852]

Remember, everyone: the OP actually believes this shit. He thinks that Atlantis was discovered. He was either told to believe this by Alex Jones or he came up with it on his own, and his brain has a defect with which he is unable to distinguish between reality and fantasy. It is impossible to convince him otherwise, no matter what kind of reasoning or evidence you use.

[Anonymous No.4599854]

I would like to argue also ask the question when do artifacts create clear edges and geometric patterns over 1/2 mile wide? None of the artifact argument is justifiable with the data I am presenting.

[Anonymous No.4599859]

>Finds anomaly
>Doesn't look for a reasonable explanation
>Jumps to completely retarded conclusion
>Pictures don't even match patterns to each other
>GTFO /sci/, back to the retarded gulags of /x/

[Anonymous No.4599868]

Thank you for your opinion. >>459985
I am presenting you with data. I have a degree in Natural Sciences and Human Physiology. I recently submitted a paper on this to San Jose State. If you want to attack my character it just shows clearly that you can't argue with me on the same level as an intellectual because you show you don't understand the simple logic of argument.

[Anonymous No.4599874]

>Could this be evidence of man made lakes and canals?
No. Next question, please.

[Anonymous No.4599889]

>>4599854
You have to present evidence artefacts couldn't form this. Just saying they can't is redundant and nothing more than opinion.

[Anonymous No.4599890]

>>4599859
this
back under bridge, OP

[Anonymous No.4599891]

Another mile wide geometric artifact, you mad bro?

[Anonymous No.4599896]

>>4599868
[sarcasm]Because Natural Sciences or Human Physiology gives you any more credibility when you are talking about Geology/Geophysics.[/sarcasm]

Anyone with a degree would most likely already know not to pull that card, so I'm calling bullshit also.

[Anonymous No.4599897]

[Anonymous No.4599900]

I guess it doesn't matter, this means nothing, thanks for your opinion sci, I will crawl back into my studies, they told Galileo he was wrong too. See ya.

[Anonymous No.4599904]

[Anonymous No.4599909]

People didn't believe Galileo either, therefore my insane crackpot conspiracy theory is correct!

[Anonymous No.4599910]

[Anonymous No.4599912]

>>4599900
We also tell faith healers that they are morons because they make the same kind claims. They assume the result then look for evidence to support it. Galileo did it the other way around.

tl'dr - You're doing science backward.

[Anonymous No.4599925]

[Anonymous No.4599950]

Oh yes, and these patterns are natural, the Earth itself carves great divits out in geometric shapes, everywhere, with 90 and 45 degree angles that line up on the latitudinal, I must be on acid. Thanks for my reality check.

[Anonymous No.4599957]

>>4599816
This.

People who buy this are even loopier than the people who were amazed by the "face" on Mars (it isn't really facelike at all when you get a good look).

[Anonymous No.4599974]

>>4599950
How /sci/ reads that post:
I conclude that the Earth didn't do it on a few two-dimensional images with no real evidence, it must be humans that are causing it!

[Anonymous No.4600021]

I will now describe the plain, which had been cultivated during many ages by many generations of kings. It was rectangular, and for the most part straight and oblong; and what it wanted of the straight line followed the line of the circular ditch.

The depth and width and length of this ditch were incredible and gave the impression that such a work, in addition to so many other works, could hardly have been wrought by the hand of man. But I must say what I have heard. It was excavated to the depth of a hundred feet, and its breadth was a stadium everywhere; it was carried round the whole of the plain, and was ten thousand stadia in length.-Plato

[Anonymous No.4600026]

It received the streams which came down from the mountains, and winding round the plain, and touching the city at various points, was there let off into the sea. From above, likewise, straight canals of a hundred feet in width were cut in the plain, and again let off into the ditch, toward the sea; these canals were at intervals of a hundred stadia, and by them they brought down the wood from the mountains to the city, and conveyed the fruits of the earth in ships, cutting transverse passages from one canal into another, and to the city.-Plato

[Anonymous No.4600086]

>Displays quote from Plato
>Pictured 'evidence' that only vaguely(or not at all) matches the description
>Location is 2000km away from the description written 2.4k years ago.
Your argument is looking worse and worse by the post.

[Anonymous No.4600091]

>>4599950
So, do you think that:

1. Some kind of underwater people did this?
2. This area was above-water any time during the past ~20,000 years? (a generous and frankly unreasonable upper limit on civilization this advanced)
3. Human civilization was around much, much longer than any legitimate scientists theorize?

Please respond; I don't want to make fun of you for the wrong reasons.

[Anonymous No.4600094]

>>4599900
> they told Galileo he was wrong too.

the same guy who thought saturn had "ears"? oh dear.

[Anonymous No.4600267]

>>4600091
It is in my hypothesis that this area was one above sea level and that, according to Plato's description, it was an area of a plain that was carved out to include canals that were supported by natural rivers and streams. I believe one of those streams came from the island of Madeira from the east, where the headwaters still flow, and others came from what were the surrounding mountains to the North.
This pic shows degraded resolution taken just a few weeks after I posted pics to web.

[Anonymous No.4600276]

Here is another cap from September of last year showing even further compression and resolution loss of the south east corner.