[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 31 KB, 210x265, oh god.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4594629 No.4594629 [Reply] [Original]

Hey /sci/, my friend is a student in the University of Zurich and he asked me this simple yet complicated question. Prove that 0.9999999999(repeating)=1

>> No.4594630

>google.com

>> No.4594643

1/3 = 0.333333333...
0.333333333... x 3 = 0.9999999999...
that's all I can think of

>> No.4594666
File: 113 KB, 953x613, 1330228980643.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4594666

sage

>> No.4594671

.99999... = lim (n=1->infinity) of (9/10) + (9/100) + ... + (9/10^n) = lim (etc) of 1 - (1/10^n) = 1

>> No.4594680

>>4594666
I don't like that sage, it didn't even use limits or sum. You should at least make them work for the answer.

>> No.4594703

The simple fact that there is a decimal before the first nine means that it will never be the same value as 1

>> No.4594710

there is no number between .999..... and 1. therefore they are the same number.

>> No.4594965 [DELETED] 
File: 8 KB, 250x208, 250px-John_H_Conway_2005_(cropped).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4594965

>>4594710
This is the best and it uses a fundamental property of the real number system instead of some bullshit assumption like 0.333... = 1/3. (Like someone will think that .9999... != 1, but .3333... = 1/3)
In fact I believe it would be possible (if my understanding of surreal numbers is correct, which I doubt it is because I just read the wikipedia article yesterday) to construct a surreal number that is less than one, but greater than all numbers with a zero in front of the decimal. Namely,
{ X | 1}
where <div class="math"> X = {x, x = \sum_{k = 1}^n \frac{9}{10^k} for some positive integer n}
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surreal_number
Pic related. The man's a muthafucking crazy genius!</div>

>> No.4594978 [DELETED] 

This is the best proof that 0.9999... = 1 because it uses a fundamental property of the real number system instead of some bullshit assumption like 0.333... = 1/3. (Like someone will think that .9999... != 1, but .3333... = 1/3)
In fact I believe it would be possible (if my understanding of surreal numbers is correct, which I doubt it is because I just read the wikipedia article yesterday) to construct a surreal number that is less than one, but greater than all numbers with a zero in front of the decimal. Namely,
{ X | 1}
where
<div class="math"> X = \left{x, x = \sum_{k = 1}^n \frac{9}{10^k} \right} </div> for some positive integer n
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surreal_number
Pic related. The man's a muthafucking crazy genius!

>> No.4594998
File: 8 KB, 250x208, 250px-John_H_Conway_2005_(cropped).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4594998

This is the best proof that 0.9999... = 1 because it uses a fundamental property of the real number system instead of some bullshit assumption like 0.333... = 1/3. (Like someone will think that .9999... != 1, but .3333... = 1/3)
In fact I believe it would be possible (if my understanding of surreal numbers is correct, which I doubt it is because I just read the wikipedia article yesterday) to construct a surreal number that is less than one, but greater than all numbers with a zero in front of the decimal. Namely,
{ X | 1}
where
X = {x, <span class="math"> x = \sum_{k = 1}^n \frac{9}{10^k} [/spoiler] } for some positive integer n
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surreal_number
Pic related. The man's a muthafucking crazy genius!

>> No.4595035

1/3 + 1/3 + 1/3 = 1
1/3 = .333...
.333 + .333 + .333 = 1/3 + 1/3 + 1/3