[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

File: 61 KB, 802x641, god wills it.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

4485517

Anonymous Tue Mar 20 04:12:16 2012 No.4485517 [Reply] [Original]

How do you feel, /sci/?

>>	Anonymous Tue Mar 20 04:16:49 2012 No.4485528 I miss the time when we used to score as academic.

>>	Anonymous Tue Mar 20 04:17:55 2012 No.4485530 >old people lolwut

>>	Anonymous Tue Mar 20 04:17:55 2012 No.4485532 >>4485517 like you should give me a link >>4485528 I miss the time when there weren't people pretending to miss times.

>>	Anonymous Tue Mar 20 04:18:03 2012 No.4485534 >>4485532 http://www.urlai.com/url/boards.4chan.org-sci

>>	Anonymous Tue Mar 20 04:21:19 2012 No.4485540 File: 25 KB, 400x352, 1304306873066.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] I remember being less more academic and less female. It's confirmed, you're all turning into bitchy retarded school girls. Sup /lit9k/?

>>	Anonymous Tue Mar 20 04:21:27 2012 No.4485541 >>4485540 >implying I haven't been acting like a girl since forever

>>	Anonymous Tue Mar 20 04:24:44 2012 No.4485544 >>4485534 it looks exactly the same for /int/

>>	Anonymous Tue Mar 20 04:27:07 2012 No.4485548 I'm ok with this. But I'm sure this kind of text analysis is unscientific and ultimately destructive

>>	Anonymous Tue Mar 20 04:29:15 2012 No.4485554 That's a lot of geezers.

>>	Anonymous Tue Mar 20 04:35:03 2012 No.4485563 >>4485517 I feel like I want to see the algorithm first and submit a reaction later.

>>	Anonymous Tue Mar 20 04:37:11 2012 No.4485567 >>4485517 Statistically, I feel personally upset.

>>	Anonymous Tue Mar 20 04:46:15 2012 No.4485570 like your algorithm is built on flaky half-assed assumptions

>>	Anonymous Tue Mar 20 05:08:55 2012 No.4485593 >>4485517 I feel a little surprised that such a text analysis tool exists, this is dampened by the knowledge that it is not very deep in its analysis. As to its 'conclusions' with regards to /sci/ I'm unsurprised, this board has gone downhill recently.

>>	Anonymous Tue Mar 20 05:10:11 2012 No.4485596 >>4485593 It's written for blog analysis and trained on blogs. You can't expect it to be accurate on anything else.

>>	Anonymous Tue Mar 20 06:28:15 2012 No.4485699 The pie graphs telling me that you can't clearly say there is a typical gender or mood for a sci writer. And why does the text say: probably written by someone between 66-100 years old ? Isn't the opposite right? Please explain it to me sci!