Are you even trying, physicsfags?

[Anonymous No.4477221]

>in physics class
>be god tier math major
>professor wants to derive a formula
>he divides by a term that can become zero
>I tell him he has to make a distinction of cases
>his answer: in physics it's okay to divide by zero
>you'll see we get the right result

>mfw physics is not rigorous
>mfw physics is the new biology

[Anonymous No.4477228]

>ITTL Babby's first exposure to singularity.

[Anonymous No.4477230]

What was the equation?

[Anonymous No.4477232]

>be physicsfag
>go to mathfag class
>99/100 people in the class get scared of application questions
>omg there are wurds, what do herp

Mathfags, are you even trying?

[Anonymous No.4477234]

>>4477232
>>4477221
>be god tier mathfag
>both of these are valid

[theta !vacuaB.oEw No.4477241]

>>4477228

[Anonymous No.4477261]

Get used to it. All functions are infinitely often differentiable, even if they aren't, all arithmetic operations like division by zero can be performed, even if they can't, all DEs have smooth solutions, even if they don't.
>physics

[Anonymous No.4477276]

>be mathfag in physics course
>we are discussing the assingments
>only the mathfags got them right
>professor tells me to explain how I solved it
>go to the blackboard and do it
>professor: Can you please explain it again and more slowly? There are non-math majors in here.
>mfw I wished I had a costanza mask

[Anonymous No.4477282]

>>4477276
wow, someone is samefagging bigtime in this thread.

someone also failed their physics course pretty hard. how's that sore feeling OP? how is it to feel intellectually inferior?

[Anonymous No.4477290]

>>4477282
Feels pretty good to have an A on my physics exam, while most physicists failed.
You're never gonna know that feel.

[Anonymous No.4477296]

>>4477282
>oh no, there's more than one superior math god
>must be a samefag

I didn't know physicsfags would go down on biology butthurt level.

[Anonymous No.4477313]

>>4477290
>>4477296
here you go again... damn I pity you

[Anonymous No.4477318]

>math
>rigorous

So why don't you guys have a unified formal system of deduction for every branch and concept? If you can't even get your logic right, how can we expect to take you guys seriously?

[Anonymous No.4477325]

>>4477318
>our numbers don't work out
>invisible dark matter in universe

[Anonymous No.4477328]

what the fuck? contain the hate to biology please

[Anonymous No.4477331]

>>4477325
you stupid shit, dark matter is just one of many possible explanations. they're constantly trying to solve this by changing the theory to suit the facts, dark matter only being one of many

[Anonymous No.4477335]

ITT newfags

[Anonymous No.4477339]

>>4477325
>shit, set theory axioms don't work for everything
>it's okay, we'll just make up a rule that says "hurp, you'll never be able to prove everything in math under a single set of axioms"
>yay we can be as illogical as we want

Mathfags.

[Anonymous No.4477363]

>>4477339
>refers to godels incompleteness theorems as made-up rules.
> doesn't know what a theorem is.
> needs to read the proof because after reading the proof it should become clear if hes any good at math, the proof should convince HIM, because its a PROOF.

[Anonymous No.4477367]

>>4477221

So you're that faggot in class who likes to hear his own voice to the extent that he stops the professor from getting to his point by indicating where he is hand-waiving for the sake of brevity and conciseness?

Fucking insecure spergs, go back to your online forums and leave us students to our sex and drugs. If you don't understand degrees of abstraction, you have no basis on which to instruct a professor, and should bring up your concerns on your own time, not on ours. Goddamn.

[Anonymous No.4477368]

>something can only be zero if it takes on non physical values
>complain when dividing by it
>mathmajorthinkingheisgodtier.mp7

[Anonymous No.4477376]

>>4477363
>Implying a physicsfag understands a proof

[Anonymous No.4477379]

>>4477367
>go back to your online forums

You mean >>>/sci/ ?

[Anonymous No.4477383]

>>4477261
>implying this isn't a fine assumption to make if you are modeling irl things
>implying a contradiction would've have been reached if this wasn't a fine assumption
>laughingelfman.rar

[Anonymous No.4477384]

>>4477379

Yes.

[Anonymous No.4477414]

>Be god tier philosophy major
>Be better than everyone else

[Anonymous No.4477429]

>he divides by a term that can become zero
>his answer: in physics it's okay to divide by zero

What the fuck am i reading here.

[Anonymous No.4477437]

whats this?

[Anonymous No.4477449]

>divides by x^2 + 1
>complains because the x might be complex
>mfw x represnets a physical object and can never be complex

[Anonymous No.4477460]

>>4477414
>philosophy
>not just applied psychology

[Anonymous No.4477475]

>ITT: Dickwaving General

[Anonymous No.4477477]

One of the most hilarious things is what while math is useless without science (or some other form of application such as economics or business), science is far from useless without math. HAHA!

[Anonymous No.4477510]

One of the most hilarious things is what while science is useless without the world (or some smaller form of subject contained in the world), the world is far from useless without Science. HAHA!

[Anonymous No.4477516]

>>4477477
HOLY SHIT TRIPPLE DUBS OMG

XDXDXD:D:D:D:D:LOLOLOL

EPIN~~~~~~

[Anonymous No.4477564]