[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 64 KB, 544x397, 1331325507335[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4448455 No.4448455 [Reply] [Original]

Richard Feynman schooling philosophy/psychologyfags

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IaO69CF5mbY

Are you ready to admit your inferior intelligence yet?

>> No.4448462

>>4448455

he thought dentistry was a pseudo-science

so ya

>> No.4448471

>>4448455


"they do science in that they gather data and analyze and so and so..but they haven't found any laws so its not science"

wtf is he talkin about?
laws aren't truth
and laws don't make science...laws can be rejected

>lmfao listening to feynman about anything other than physics or banging drums

>> No.4448485
File: 13 KB, 363x364, 53.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4448485

>>4448455
mfw any argument is necessarily a branch of philosophy and so you can't claim it is useless

>> No.4448855

This is partly true, as much of psychology isn't really based on the scientific method. Some of it is, though, which is why it pertains partly to science. To me, if a subject isn't entirely based on science, it isn't science.

Philosophy is important though, because science is based on it. That's not to say that philosophy is a science, though.

>> No.4448868

>>4448855
I completely agree.

>> No.4448876

bilogy

>> No.4448885

>>4448855

Depends on the branch of psychology.

>> No.4448890

>>4448455
I try to keep a cold logical point of view regarding opinions like these, so I don't get biased one way or the other and can draw my own conclusions

But god fucking damn it Feynman has so much swag I can't disagree with anything he says, ever

>> No.4449423

>>4448890

>easily swayed by dominant male's opinions
>hasn't formed an opinion himself

beta detected.