[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 9 KB, 231x251, 1318460149610s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4359457 No.4359457 [Reply] [Original]

so, what does sci think of this?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GFLkou8NvJo

>> No.4359461

mind the lisp

>> No.4359471
File: 214 KB, 500x501, 1322703446895.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4359471

bump for sweet paradoxical justice

>> No.4359473 [DELETED] 
File: 623 KB, 839x760, 116163.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4359473

reported for vihart. enjoy your ban.

>> No.4359476

>It's almost like it is an equation that summarizes the uncertainty of nature, and how it yearns for balance

>> No.4359484

>>4359473
reported for pony trolling

>> No.4359490

e-to-the-two-i-pi-wau-square = wau

pretty cool.

>> No.4359493

>>4359457
pretentious, pseudo-math bullshit
makes first-years and high-school students wet and weak at the knees

>> No.4359499

>>4359493
I'd agree with the context of half the shit she said at the beginning of the video.
But i'd actually love to see the application of this, not ALL of it seemed like bullshit

>> No.4359503

another interesting property
<span class="math">F^2=F[/spoiler]

>> No.4359508

so wow...
I just wasted time...

I hope pure math people don't actually look at this

>if you looped exponential to infinity then back from infinity, back to the number... you have done nothing useful
>even has physics... doesn't relate to a new physics concept... or useful implications

yes im a physfag

>> No.4359516

she said d/dx e^wau = wau *e, which is clearly wrong if wau = 1, since e^wau is constant.

>> No.4359526

>>4359476
>>4359493
>>4359499
>>4359508
ITT: Aspies don't know about art.

>> No.4359527

>>4359508
well said, I completely misunderstood the power to infinity bit;
as if you powered it to infinity it worked out to one. which seems remarkable, but it is just all bullshit

>> No.4359534

For some reason, this get me really mad

>> No.4359535 [DELETED] 

can someone link to the wiki article on this number? i cant find it

>> No.4359549
File: 176 KB, 826x966, 1325536821961.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4359549

>>4359535
>mfw

>> No.4359575

For all those of you without the mathematical ability to realise what she was talking about - its 1.

>>4359457
I think it was a waste of 1 minute and five seconds of my life.

>> No.4359600

Fuck you, op, and fuck Vi Hart.

>> No.4359617

Why is she trying to make her voice sound more sexy/sensual?

She should have kept her voice the same as it was in those tau videos she did.

>> No.4359785
File: 617 KB, 211x199, 1327180455420.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4359785

>This looks interesting. I wonder if it can be represented by a conditionally converging series?
>Google search
>Nothing to be found
Wow

>> No.4359840

Dude this Wau is bullshit! all records of it on google are like 2 days old! wtf! This sounds like some scam!

>> No.4359846

>>4359785
>Google search
Lrn2reallysearch
economicexpert*D0T*com/a/Digamma:function*D0T*html

>> No.4359903
File: 611 KB, 2022x1264, 1329023239149.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4359903

>>4359846
Thank you, sir

>> No.4359926

>>4359457
It's the number 1, this is pure sophistry and over-complication for the sake of seeming smart and mysterious. Utterly useless shit.

>> No.4359963

ITT idiots. ViHart clearly intended it to be a joke.

>> No.4359977

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qsE2UKkIKXU

>implying you don't want a girlfriend like her

>> No.4359979

>>4359963
ViHart should probably stick to doing 'pretty math videos' then because I don't see who this is supposed to make laugh. Mathematicians would shit ragefuel and non-mathematicians wouldn't get it.

>> No.4359994

>ITT I still have a crush on Jenny