[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 20 KB, 250x302, 1105abelson_stress_sapolsky.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4346599 No.4346599 [Reply] [Original]

Your favorite current day scientist (i.e. must be alive).

GO!

>> No.4346606

michio kaku

>> No.4346607

Neil Tyson - as an educator.

>> No.4346610

>>4346606
doesnt he believe in ghosts or something?

>not worthy

>> No.4346611

So far we have 3 non-scientists ITT.

/sci/, I am disappoint

>> No.4346617
File: 105 KB, 455x330, ROBERT_SAPOLSKY.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4346617

>>4346611
>Robert Sapolsky
>not a scientist

Seems like someone wants their shit slapped

>> No.4346619

>>4346617
Social scientists don't count.

>> No.4346621
File: 302 KB, 486x322, dense.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4346621

>>4346619

>> No.4346622

Michael Behe

>> No.4346625

>>4346621
No u

>> No.4346627

>>4346622
Challenge accepted

>> No.4346630

/sci/ only likes obscure scientists with large, unkempt beards who shy away from engaging the public at large because they have typically have the social skills of a fruit fly and any hint of ignorance towards their field of study causes them to fly into wild, angry rage

>> No.4346635

Georges Lemaître

>> No.4346647
File: 55 KB, 250x250, 1328544102307.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4346647

>>4346630
Projecting much?

>> No.4346655

>>4346647

Not that guy, but it's true.

One mention of any non-obscure scientist is met with HURR POP SCI CRAP LOL SAGE XD

>> No.4346666

>>4346655
except for that one faggot who was obviously trolling, no one said anything about NDT or Kaku. And, being a cognitive neuroscience student, I just really like Sapolsky. I also don't think he's THAT obscure. Plus, he may have a large magnificent beard, but he's a good public speaker and doesn't seem to have any noticeable social defects.

>> No.4346664

>>4346647
>>4346647
Projection typically deals with ascribing psychological faults onto other individuals.

I highly doubt anyone (besides those who are so mentally ill that they couldn't use a computer) is so unaware of themselves that they don't realize they have a large neckbeard

>> No.4346668

>>4346666
But he is NOT a scientist. Deal with it.

>> No.4346671
File: 94 KB, 416x431, 1314250442688.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4346671

>>4346668

>> No.4346672

>>4346666
>one faggot
>back to back posts about the two

>> No.4346673

>>4346655

that's just because almost all of 4chan is composed of hipsters. they could never be popular themselves so they were forced to indulge in things that are inherently unpopular.

>> No.4346674

Erik von Daniken

>> No.4346676

richard dawkins

>> No.4346677

christopher hitchens

>> No.4346681

>>4346671
You are the only troll here.

>> No.4346684

The Amazing Atheist

>> No.4346686
File: 94 KB, 640x488, Gordon Freeman has grown old.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4346686

Does he count?

>> No.4346690

EK

>> No.4346698

mathgenius (not trolling)

>> No.4346700
File: 11 KB, 410x284, 1291071399066.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4346700

>>4346690
<3

>> No.4346702

>>4346690
awwwwwwww thanks hun

>> No.4346707

>no Dr. Girgio Tsoukalos

typical for a bunch of dilettantes like /sci/

>> No.4346708
File: 76 KB, 268x265, 1289619156516.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4346708

>>4346702
reported for not being EK

>> No.4346713

I'd go with Claude Berrou or Erdal Arikan. But then again, I'm an information theory guy.

>> No.4346721

>>4346708

REPORTED FOR BEING EK
Gtfo you non-scientific ugly whore

>> No.4346722

>implying Nikoli Tesla ever died

>> No.4346729

Stephen Hawkings, Does he count?

>> No.4346731

>>4346729

not a real scientist

>> No.4346744

>>4346729
No. The word scientists implies the ability to walk.

>> No.4346745

>>4346731
I guess /sci/ doesn't like Kip Thorne because he has appeared on one or two Discovery channel programs?

>> No.4346753

>>4346745
/sci/ doesnt know who kip thorne is

>> No.4346754

>>4346745

100% correct

>> No.4346764
File: 14 KB, 440x308, arthur jensen (drawing a bell curve on the black board).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4346764

>> No.4346766

>>4346764
Not a scientist.

>> No.4346782
File: 44 KB, 569x412, How About I Slap Your Shit.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4346782

>>4346766

>> No.4346897

>>4346713

NOT SCIENTISTS

>> No.4346902

I am my favorite current scientist. Who else (other than me) could reach my genius level?

>> No.4347016

>>4346902

not a scientist

>> No.4347022

The only true SCIENTIST is SCIENCE itself. Only a heretic would state otherwise.

>> No.4347028

>>4347016
You are right, a genius is more than just a scientist.

>> No.4347523

Alexander Shulgin

>> No.4347555
File: 17 KB, 425x320, Daniel-Kahneman.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4347555

>>4346630
Robert Sopolsky is a very public scientist and quite gregarious when discussing the relation between apes and humans, specifically his work on corticoids, stress and social behavior.

How about you stop shitting up half decent threads and post some interesting scientists?

>> No.4347559

>>4347555
Knowing some shit about monkeys is not science.

0/10, lame troll

>> No.4347563

>>4347559
>0/10, lame troll

Lol how ironic. Keep being miserable bro.

>> No.4347567

>>4347563
What's up, troll?
If you want a higher rating, you have to improve your trolling skills.

>> No.4347578
File: 46 KB, 600x412, aaronson.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4347578

This guy.

Why, you must be asking, and i answer you: Because he got me into theory of computation, complexity theory more specifically.

>> No.4347583
File: 18 KB, 480x360, kirksorensen.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4347583

>>4347567
Hahaha not even trolling bro. I said it's ironic because it's you who's acting like the troll here.

Stop shitting up threads and post some scientists.

>> No.4347600

>>4347583
Posting scientists ITT is pointless. The whole thread has the silly purpose of posting stupid/annoying people who are not scientists and to declare them as scientists, hoping to make anyone mad this way.
In other words, this thread is inane trolling garbage.