[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 2.47 MB, 1943x2479, asset.PNG?id=908D8193-5326-42C5-A7B5-F70652D7F550&ext.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4328608 No.4328608 [Reply] [Original]

Could some of the panels on this image be actually accurate/possible?
Why?

>> No.4328629

>>4328608

religiously significant artifacts dosnt seem crazy

>> No.4328955

>>4328629
No, the graph implies that if religiously significant artifacts are used in a "theory", it is very likely that if falls under fringe science.

OP, many things in the graph are very valid scientific concepts. Chaotic systems do exist. A particle that just might be the Higgs boson has been detected at the LHC. Quantum entanglement is also a fact. The point of the graph is that when they are used irresponsibly as mere buzzwords, they are probably pseudoscientific.

>> No.4329791

bamp

>> No.4329799
File: 118 KB, 397x298, 1324180697632.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4329799

>>4328955
give this man a medal troll religion thread averted

>> No.4329956

>>4328955
No, the signs weren't drawn to be used against fiction, but rather in fiction. I remember the thread where these were first posted.

>> No.4330108

fringe science only indicates the as yet unproven theories that may or may not eventually be accepted by popular thought

>> No.4330173

That list looks like a compilation of title pages from New Scientist articles.