[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 9 KB, 855x141, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4309746 No.4309746 [Reply] [Original]

Solipsists win. Peace out.

>> No.4309772

Not bad OP, but I am also a Solipist. What now?

>> No.4309775

oh yea? Prove Solipsism right

>> No.4309799

Pyrrhonism was here
Solipsism is for faggots
Probably

>> No.4310479

Solipsis' claim cannot be proven or disproven.

>> No.4310484

The Holocoast cannot be proven.
Thanks Solipsist, you're the best!

>> No.4310488

How is that solipsism? There should be an "except my consciousness" tacked on at the end.

>> No.4311779

Uh.
Depends on the assumptions on which the proof is based.
The only basic assumption one can make is 'I think, therefore i exist'.
And that's it.
Now, assuming basic math, one can derive advanced math.
Assuming the observed facts are real, one can derive a lot of shit.

>> No.4311855

Logic is axiomatic in nature.

Solipism is illogical.

>> No.4311873

The only thing that can be proven is that OP is a fag.

>> No.4311885

>>4309746
I call bullshit.

I can prove that I exist to me. Decartes -- dispite being a huge faggot, was right. He can, at least, prove his own existance to himself.

>> No.4311890
File: 56 KB, 735x500, comic2-638[1].png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4311890

>Solipsists win
But what do they win?

Absofuckinglutely nothing.

That sounds like losing to me.

>> No.4311884

>>4311873
THIS

>> No.4311894

>>4311885
That's perfectly compatible with solipsism.

It's the existence of everything else that they get their panties in a wad about. But then see
>>4311890

>> No.4311897

>>4310479
Solipsism is true because it's tautological.

>> No.4311907

>>4311885
The OP fucked up in the pic, that's not solipsism. Your mind gets an "OK, I exist" freebie.

>> No.4311908

A solipsist cannot argue that his or her theory is correct.

>> No.4311913

Solipsism is as unassailable as it is pointless.

>> No.4311918

>>4311779
If you don't learn language, you can't even make that ass_umption.

So solipsism is self-referential...

>> No.4311968

The maximal certainty of something can be 99.99~%

While everyone else just says "close enough" , solipsists are very prudent motherfuckers.Logically , and in an individual case solipsism wins.Although in a sequence , faith in those 99% win.

I don't know if you guys know what I mean by this but oh well.

>> No.4311975

>>4311968
I don't think many people actively deny the possibility of solipsism (claim perfect knowledge that other minds and objects exist objectively). Sure, maybe I'm dreaming or something.

But most people recognize that it's really fucking pointless to worry about it.