[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 38 KB, 750x600, supernova.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4256148 No.4256148 [Reply] [Original]

>not being a pantheist
>2011

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pantheism

>> No.4256159

sounds like Avatar

>> No.4256168

but if god is the universe
then who created the universe?

>> No.4256175

>>4256168
Who says the universe was created? What if it was always here?

>> No.4256178

>2012

>> No.4256182
File: 199 KB, 609x1390, 1325060075063.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4256182

>> No.4256186

>>4256175
I.e., reality originated from itself.

The idea of panatheism is exactly how I percieve this jazz, but what turns me off is how they're capitalizing and using the word god in its description.

>> No.4256188

This is not science. This is philosophy. The two do have some cross-over, but this is not one of them.

GTFO.

>> No.4256191

christianity makes more sense than fucking pantheism

>> No.4256200

>Pantheist & Animist.
Also what planet you from? It is 2012.

>> No.4256201

>>4256191
not sure if serious...

>> No.4256203
File: 25 KB, 250x250, 1301753499144.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4256203

>>4256191

>> No.4256211
File: 9 KB, 225x225, here we go.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4256211

>>4256191
>>4256191
>>4256191
>>4256191
>>4256191

>> No.4256212

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pandeism

Pandeism is vastly superior. It kind of reminds me of the pokemon movie, where mewtwo was created but knew nothing about himself.

>> No.4256217
File: 543 KB, 539x701, 1305399241213.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4256217

>>4256212
>comparing religion to pokemon

I know you guys have autism, but come on.

>> No.4256221

>2012
>Not deistic
>I seriously hope...

>> No.4256233
File: 28 KB, 454x454, 1325133912969.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4256233

>>4256221
Why would a divine being create the universe then not interact with it?

>> No.4256234

>2012
>still seeing people talking about "god" when they don't even know what "god" is.
>suggest taking some lit. theory classes

>> No.4256240

Hey /sci/, how could a god be all knowing, if at one point nothing but him existed?

Could an omnipotent being be completely knowledgeable about things don't exist?

>> No.4256242

>>4256217
If people are stupid enough to think that faith trumps observable evidence, then they're stupid enough to think that lightning-throwing animals can survive being crushed into a space smaller than they are and survive.

>> No.4256252
File: 105 KB, 400x400, 1318400485344.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4256252

>>4256242
>implying Mewtwo used lightning

>> No.4256259

>>4256168
10/10

>> No.4256266
File: 35 KB, 480x480, 1326057378372.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4256266

Naturalistic Pantheism holds that there is only one type of substance, and that substance is physical, i.e. able at its most basic level to be described by physics, though more complex phenomena such as life, consciousness and societies can appear through emergence.

How the fuck does that explain "god" why not just call it fucking nature, it has nothing to do with anything that has anything to do with the definition of god..

>> No.4256278

>>4256266
It explains the origin of nature.

>> No.4256286

>>4256278

thats scientifically understood as the fucking big bang, so no need to call it god or divine

>> No.4256294
File: 46 KB, 339x398, Schopenhauer.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4256294

>>4256266

"The chief objection I have to Pantheism is that it says nothing. To call the world “God” is not to explain it; it is only to enrich our language with a superfluous synonym for the word “world.” It comes to the same thing whether you say “the world is God,” or “God is the world.”

>> No.4256302

>>4256266
I don't understand the concept of emergence.

>> No.4256303
File: 13 KB, 244x179, laughing_girls.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4256303

>>4256148
>2011
>linking the wiki article as if we don't know what pantheism is

>> No.4256307
File: 1.00 MB, 355x195, 1306847478179.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4256307

>>4256286
>implying god didn't blow himself up in the big bang in order to transform into the universe

>> No.4256312

>nature is a higher authority

Holy shit it's fucking nothing. You're a fucking atheist, just say it and get it over with.

>> No.4256314

>>4256303
Most people on /sci/ at 17.

>> No.4256316
File: 53 KB, 409x405, 1291425463535.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4256316

>>4256307
That young human female in your animated gif has many features and performs various movements that I find arousing.

That is all.

>> No.4256327

>>4256307
Where did you find that gif?

>> No.4256332
File: 23 KB, 248x239, 1313206544612.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4256332

>>4256307

>> No.4256343

>>4256307
Who is the girl? I wish to procure more masturbation material for future sessions of self-pleasure

>> No.4256361
File: 759 KB, 250x209, notsureiflike.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4256361

>>4256316

>gif, you say?

>> No.4256378

>>4256343

>Dirty murrican peasant hasnt watched Skins

>> No.4256383

>>4256378
>Pretentious brit expects everyone to be aware of his obscure shitty TV shows

>> No.4256416

>>4256343
Could be wrong as I had to do extensive googling and guessing, but it seems to be a girl named Kayla Scodelario.