[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 66 KB, 350x498, jesus-christ.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4091720 No.4091720 [Reply] [Original]

The only reason why athiests reply to religion threads, is because they're insecure and secretly want to admit that God might exist.

>> No.4091731
File: 151 KB, 748x486, 1321504909417.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4091731

agreed

>> No.4091743

>>4091731
made this earlier
http://imgur.com/a/eJNNu

>> No.4091749

>>4091731
Carl Sagan was an atheist, even though he didn't like the term.

The Dragon In My Garage, by Carl Sagan
http://www.godlessgeeks.com/LINKS/Dragon.htm

>> No.4091755

>>4091743
You, Sir, are a winrar.
This link deserves a sticky on /sci/.

>> No.4091773
File: 41 KB, 437x400, 1284808500401.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4091773

>> No.4091807

A lot of people who choose to be atheists do it just to feel superior because it makes more sense than many religions.

Arrogant atheists are fucking horrible, but not all atheists are bad just as not all muslims are bad.

>> No.4091817
File: 18 KB, 480x480, dorothy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4091817

>>4091720
The only reason atheists respond to religion threads is because despite the fact that all of our lives end in a matter of decades, they cannot be satisfied in letting others spend their years however makes them happy.

They are convinced that their happiness only comes with absolute truth. They are also convinced that the concepts of "god" and "knowledge" are contradictory.

They also do not recognize that the foundation of philosophy using logic is contradictory idea in itself, as logic ultimately falls on "intuitive fact" for justification, when "intuitive fact" has proven to not be reliable multiple times in the past. Their search for the "truth" is ultimately both fruitless and hollow, as all knowledge they claim to have is still, at its core, an assumption. Ironically, these are almost word for word the same complaints I have against religion.

To clarify, I do not think atheism is wrong. I do, however, find the question "does god exist" to be completely moot, as bog "god" and "logic" ultimately share the same fate: They cannot be proven or disproven. They can only be assumed. Logic need not be rejected, nor the idea of god be rejected. They simply need to be recognized as assumptions.

Sage, because I'm not all that fond of you, OP. You come across as a massive asshole and a total shitdisturber.

>> No.4091830

>>4091817
>bog
Meant to say "both".

>> No.4092374
File: 31 KB, 232x199, forever.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4092374

>>4091817
>You come across as a massive asshole and a total shitdisturber.